Literature DB >> 22522189

Surgical management of a suspicious adnexal mass: a systematic review.

Allan L Covens1, Jason E Dodge, Christina Lacchetti, Laurie M Elit, Tien Le, Michaela Devries-Aboud, Michael Fung-Kee-Fung.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the existing literature in order to determine the optimal recommended protocols for the surgical management of adnexal masses suspicious for apparent early stage malignancy.
METHODS: A review of all systematic reviews and guidelines published between 1999 and 2009 was conducted as a first step. After the identification of two systematic reviews on the topic, searches of MEDLINE for studies published since 2004 were also conducted to update and supplement the evidentiary base.
RESULTS: The updated literature search identified 31 studies that met the inclusion criteria. A bivariate random effects analysis of 15 frozen section diagnosis studies yielded an overall sensitivity of 89.2% (95% CI, 86.3 to 91.5%) and specificity of 97.9% (95% CI, 96.6 to 98.7%). The surgical evidence suggests that systematic lymphadenectomy and proper surgical staging improve survival. Conservative fertility-preserving surgical approaches are an acceptable option in women with low malignant potential tumours. The accuracy and the adequacy of surgical staging by laparotomy or laparoscopic approaches appear to be comparable, with neither approach conferring a survival advantage. Intraoperative tumour rupture was indeed reported to occur more frequently in patients undergoing laparoscopy versus laparotomy in two retrospective cohort studies.
CONCLUSIONS: The best available evidence was collected and included in this rigorous systematic review. The abundant evidentiary base provided the context and direction for the surgical management of adnexal masses suspicious for apparent early stage malignancy.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22522189     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  5 in total

1.  Minimally invasive surgery for early-stage ovarian cancer: Association between hospital surgical volume and short-term perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Koji Matsuo; Erica J Chang; Shinya Matsuzaki; Rachel S Mandelbaum; Kazuhide Matsushima; Brendan H Grubbs; Maximilian Klar; Lynda D Roman; Anil K Sood; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Management of the Adnexal Mass: Considerations for the Family Medicine Physician.

Authors:  Brian Bullock; Lisa Larkin; Lauren Turker; Kate Stampler
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-05

Review 3.  Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for FIGO stage I ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Frederico S Falcetta; Theresa A Lawrie; Lídia Rf Medeiros; Maria Ines da Rosa; Maria I Edelweiss; Airton T Stein; Alice Zelmanowicz; Anaelena B Moraes; Roselaine R Zanini; Daniela D Rosa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-13

4.  Criteria for selection of laparoscopy for women with adnexal mass.

Authors:  Amilcar Barreta; Luis Felipe Sallum; Luis Otávio Sarian; Joana Fróes Bragança Bastos; Sophie Derchain
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Laparoscopic Cystectomy In-a-Bag of an Intact Cyst: Is It Feasible and Spillage-Free After All?

Authors:  Stelios Detorakis; Dimitrios Vlachos; Stavros Athanasiou; Themistoklis Grigoriadis; Aikaterini Domali; Ioannis Chatzipapas; Emmanuel Stamatakis; Athanasios Mousiolis; Apostolos Patrikios; Aris Antsaklis; Dimitrios Loutradis; Athanasios Protopapas
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2016-03-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.