Literature DB >> 22522147

Enhancing informed consent best practices: gaining patient, family and provider perspectives using reverse simulation.

Elizabeth Goldfarb1, John A Fromson, Tristan Gorrindo, Robert J Birnbaum.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obtaining informed consent in the clinical setting is an important yet challenging aspect of providing safe and collaborative care to patients. While the medical profession has defined best practices for obtaining informed consent, it is unclear whether these standards meet the expressed needs of patients, their families as well as healthcare providers. The authors sought to address this gap by comparing the responses of these three groups with a standardised informed consent paradigm.
METHODS: Piloting a web-based 'reverse' simulation paradigm, participants viewed a video showing a standardised doctor engaging in an informed consent discussion. The scenario depicted a simulated patient with psychotic symptoms who is prescribed an atypical antipsychotic medication. 107 participants accessed the simulation online and completed a web-based debriefing survey.
RESULTS: Survey responses from patients, family members and healthcare providers indicated disparities in information retention, perception of the doctor's performance and priorities for required elements of the consent process.
CONCLUSIONS: To enhance existing informed consent best practices, steps should be taken to improve patient retention of critical information. Adverse events should be described in the short-term and long-term along with preventative measures, and alternative psychosocial and pharmacological treatment options should be reviewed. Information about treatment should include when the medication takes therapeutic effect and how to safely maintain the treatment. The reverse simulation design is a model that can discern gaps in clinical practice, which can be used to improve patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22522147     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  1 in total

1.  Enhancing the Informed Consent Process Using Shared Decision Making and Consent Refusal Data from the CLEAR III Trial.

Authors:  Amanda L Porter; James Ebot; Karen Lane; Lesia H Mooney; Amy M Lannen; Eugene M Richie; Rachel Dlugash; Steve Mayo; Thomas G Brott; Wendy Ziai; William D Freeman; Daniel F Hanley
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.210

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.