Literature DB >> 22521985

[A more and more painful intrauterine device… where it is not enough to see the wires to exclude malposition!].

E Nohuz1, R Battista2, S Tamburro2, M Leonenko2, S Bayeh2, J Varga3, G Mage4.   

Abstract

We report a case of a 30-year-old woman with an intrauterine device (IUD) improperly inserted deep within the myometrium, with a muscularis layer injury of the recto-sigmoid colon resulting of a uterine perforation and presented as abdomino-pelvic pain and dyspareunia. The ultrasonographic control of the IUD after the insertion (performed seven months before) was not checked. Cervical examination showed the strings of the IUD. The ultrasonographic exploration identified an intra-myometrial IUD with fundus perforation of the uterus. A laparoscopic exploration permitting the removal of the IUD revealed an insertion through the bowel wall. The lessons to draw of about this case report are discussed through a brief review of the literature.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraception; Cœlioscopie; Dispositif intra-utérin; Dyspareunia; Dyspareunie; Intrauterine device; Laparoscopy; Perforation; Ultrasonography; Échographie

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22521985     DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2011.08.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Fertil        ISSN: 1297-9589


  2 in total

1.  Malpositioned IUCD: the menace of postpartum IUCD insertion.

Authors:  Aruna Nigam; Ayesha Ahmad; Neha Gupta; Archana Kumari
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-08-19

Review 2.  Is It a "Colon Perforation"? A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Shuangshuang Lu; Xinyu Yao; Jun Shi; Jian Huang; Shaohua Zhuang; Junfang Ma; Yan Liu; Wei Zhang; Lifei Yu; Ping Zhu; Qiuwei Zhu; Ruxia Shi; Hong Zheng; Dong Shao; Yuyan Pan; Shizhen Bao; Li Qin; Lijie Huang; Wenjia Liu; Jin Huang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.