Literature DB >> 22521918

[European Association of Urology guidelines on vasectomy].

G R Dohle1, T Diemer, Z Kopa, C Krausz, A Giwercman, A Jungwirth.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The European Association of Urology presents its guidelines for vasectomy. Vasectomy is highly effective, but problems can arise that are related to insufficient preoperative patient information, the surgical procedure, and postoperative follow-up.
OBJECTIVE: These guidelines aim to provide information and recommendations for physicians who perform vasectomies and to promote the provision of adequate information to the patient before the operation to prevent unrealistic expectations and legal procedures. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: An extensive review of the literature was carried out using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from 1980 to 2010. The focus was on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses of RCTs (level 1 evidence) and on well-designed studies without randomisation (level 2 and 3 evidence). A total of 113 unique records were identified for consideration. Non-English language publications were excluded as well as studies published as abstracts only or reports from meetings. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The guidelines discuss indications and contraindications for vasectomy, preoperative patient information and counselling, surgical techniques, postoperative care and subsequent semen analysis, and complications and late consequences.
CONCLUSIONS: Vasectomy is intended to be a permanent form of contraception. There are no absolute contraindications for vasectomy. Relative contraindications may be the absence of children, age <30 yr, severe illness, no current relationship, and scrotal pain. Preoperative counselling should include alternative methods of contraception, complication and failure rates, and the need for postoperative semen analysis. Informed consent should be obtained before the operation. Although the use of mucosal cautery and fascial interposition have been shown to reduce early failure compared to simple ligation and excision of a small vas segment, no robust data show that a particular vasectomy technique is superior in terms of prevention of late recanalisation and spontaneous pregnancy after vasectomy. After semen analysis, clearance can be given in case of documented azoospermia and in case of rare nonmotile spermatozoa in the ejaculate at least 3 mo after the procedure.
Copyright © 2012 AEU. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22521918     DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2012.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Actas Urol Esp        ISSN: 0210-4806            Impact factor:   0.994


  4 in total

1.  A simple technique for double ligation of the vas deferens during vasectomy.

Authors:  N A Faure Walker; T Rashid; J Bellringer
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Paternity seven years after a negative post-vasectomy semen analysis: a case report.

Authors:  Athena Michaelides; Mehrban Ghani
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2020-04-22

Review 3.  Review of Vasectomy Complications and Safety Concerns.

Authors:  Fang Yang; Junjun Li; Liang Dong; Kun Tan; Xiaopeng Huang; Peihai Zhang; Xiaozhang Liu; Degui Chang; Xujun Yu
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 5.400

4.  Prospective comparison of ligation and bipolar cautery technique in non-scalpel vasectomy.

Authors:  Muammer Altok; Ali Feyzullah Şahin; Rauf Taner Divrik; Umit Yildirim; Ferruh Zorlu
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.