Literature DB >> 22521845

Monitoring of progress in the establishment and strengthening of national immunization technical advisory groups.

Philippe Duclos1, Stephanie Ortynsky, Nihal Abeysinghe, Niyazi Cakmak, Cara Bess Janusz, Barbara Jauregui, Richard Mihigo, Liudmila Mosina, Nahad Sadr-Azodi, Yashohiro Takashima, Laure Dumolard, Marta Gacic-Dobo.   

Abstract

The majority of industrialized and some developing countries have established technical advisory bodies to guide and formulate national immunization policies and strategies. These are referred to as National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs), WHO and its partners have placed a high priority on assisting in the establishment or strengthening of functional, sustainable, and independent NITAGs. To enable systematic global monitoring of the existence and functionality of NITAGs, in 2010, WHO and UNICEF included related questions in the WHO-UNICEF Joint Reporting Form (JRF) that provides an official means for WHO and UNICEF to collect indicators of immunization programme performance. This paper presents the status of NITAGs based on the analysis of the 2010 JRF. Although 115 countries (64% of responders) reported having a NITAG in 2010, only 50% of countries reported the existence of a NITAG with a formal administrative or legislative basis. Despite limitations in the ability to compare 2010 JRF data with that from a 2008 global survey, it appears that substantial progress has been achieved globally over with 43 committees reporting affirmatively about six NITAG process indicators, compared with 23 in the 2008 survey. Impressive progress has been observed in the proportion of countries reporting NITAGs with formal terms of reference (24% increase), a legislative or administrative basis (10% increase), and a requirement for members to disclose their interests (14% increase). Some of the poorest developing countries now enjoy support from a NITAG which meet all six process indicators. These may serve as examples for other countries.
Copyright © 2012 World Health Organization. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22521845     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  7 in total

1.  Landscape of vaccine access and health technology assessment role in decision-making process in ASEAN countries.

Authors:  Suthira Taychakhoonavudh; Woralak Chumchujan; Raymond Hutubessy; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Stakeholders' perception on including broader economic impact of vaccines in economic evaluations in low and middle income countries: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Ingeborg M van der Putten; Silvia M A A Evers; Rohan Deogaonkar; Mark Jit; Raymond C W Hutubessy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Strengthening national vaccine decision-making: Assessing the impact of SIVAC Initiative support on national immunisation technical advisory group (NITAG) functionality in 77 low and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Kevin van Zandvoort; Natasha Howard; Sandra Mounier-Jack; Mark Jit
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 4.  Sustaining Vaccine Confidence in the 21st Century.

Authors:  Karin Hardt; Ruprecht Schmidt-Ott; Steffen Glismann; Richard A Adegbola; François P Meurice
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2013-06-24

5.  The need for sustainability and alignment of future support for National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) in low and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Natasha Howard; Sadie Bell; Helen Walls; Laurence Blanchard; Logan Brenzel; Mark Jit; Sandra Mounier-Jack
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Existence and functionality of national immunisation technical advisory groups in Africa from 2010 to 2016.

Authors:  Alison B Wiyeh; Evanson Z Sambala; Ntombenhle Ngcobo; Charles S Wiysonge
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  The role of National Immunisation Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) in strengthening national vaccine decision-making: A comparative case study of Armenia, Ghana, Indonesia, Nigeria, Senegal and Uganda.

Authors:  Natasha Howard; Helen Walls; Sadie Bell; Sandra Mounier-Jack
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.641

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.