Averaging is not everything: the saccade global effect weakens with increasing stimulus size.

When two elements are presented closely aligned, the average saccade endpoint will generally be located in between these two elements. This 'global effect' has been explained in terms of the center of gravity account which states that the saccade endpoint is based on the relative saliency of the different elements in the visual display. In the current study, we tested one of the implications of the center of gravity account: when two elements are presented closely aligned with the same size and the same distance from central fixation, the saccade should land on the intermediate location, irrespective of the stimulus size. To this end, two equally-sized elements were presented simultaneously and participants were required to execute an eye movement to the visual information presented on the display. Results showed that the strongest global effect was observed in the condition with smaller stimuli, whereas the saccade averaging was weaker when larger stimuli were presented. In a second experiment, in which only one element was presented, we observed that the width of the distribution of saccade endpoints is influenced by stimulus size in that the distribution is broader with smaller stimuli. We conclude that perfect saccade averaging is not always the default response by the oculomotor system. There appears to be a tendency to initiate an eye movement towards one of the visual elements, which becomes stronger with increasing stimulus size. This effect might be explained by an increased uncertainty in target localization for smaller stimuli, resulting in a higher probability of the merging of two stimulus representations into one representation.