Literature DB >> 22521393

Perforation tolerance of glenoid implants to abnormal glenoid retroversion, anteversion, and medialization.

Francis Sie Hui Ting1, Peter Channel Poon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Loosening of the glenoid implant is a common complication of total shoulder arthroplasty. To prevent this, we need to ensure the glenoid vault is not perforated during insertion of the glenoid implant to allow for cement containment and maximum pressurization. Factors affecting perforation potential include glenoid implant design and alignment. This study looks at the perforation tolerance of 15 commercially available glenoid implants to increased retroversion, increased anteversion, and medialization.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Accurate 3-dimensional models of the 15 glenoid implants were created from exact dimensions obtained from the manufacturers and virtually implanted into 3-dimensional reconstructed models of 40 nonarthritic scapulae. Perforation tolerances of each implant to increased retroversion, increased anteversion, and medialization were determined through computer simulation to represent asymmetrical arthritic posterior wear, anterior wear, and eccentric corrective reaming, respectively.
RESULTS: In all 15 glenoid implants, the overall mean increased retroversion tolerated before perforation was 19°, increased anteversion was 16°, and abnormal version fully corrected by eccentric reaming was 17°. Each glenoid implant was evaluated individually to allow for direct comparison and, finally, size-matched and downsized glenoid implants in relation to the size of the humeral head.
CONCLUSION: The results from this study help surgeons, when faced with a severely arthritic glenoid, to choose the appropriate glenoid implant to minimize perforation potential, and provide guidance on how much abnormal version and how much corrective reaming can be tolerated before perforation occurs and fixation is compromised. These results can also help with future implant designs.
Copyright © 2013 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22521393     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  9 in total

1.  Risk of Perforation Is High During Corrective Reaming of Retroverted Glenoids: A Computer Simulation Study.

Authors:  Alexander W Aleem; Nathan D Orvets; Brendan C Patterson; Aaron M Chamberlain; Jay D Keener
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Tomographic Analysis of Positioning of Reverse Baseplates Positioning.

Authors:  Alexandre Almeida; Daniel C Agostini; Pietro Ft Nesello; Nayvaldo C de Almeida; Rafael Mioso; Ana Paula Agostini
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2021-02-15

3.  Quantitative assessment and characterization of glenoid bone loss in a spectrum of patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  D J Lombardo; J Khan; B Prey; L Zhang; G R Petersen-Fitts; V J Sabesan
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-06-03

4.  Number of pegs influence focal stress distributions and micromotion in glenoid implants: a finite element study.

Authors:  Abdul Hadi Abdul Wahab; Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir; Muhammad Noor Harun; Tunku Kamarul; Ardiyansyah Syahrom
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Glenoid vault perforation in total shoulder arthroplasty: Do we need computer guidance?

Authors:  Jennifer N Flynn; Malin Wijeratna; Matthew Evans; Steven Lee; David McD Taylor; Gregory A Hoy
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-11-20

6.  Computed tomography measurement of glenoid vault version as an alternative measuring method for glenoid version.

Authors:  Noboru Matsumura; Kiyohisa Ogawa; Hiroyasu Ikegami; Philippe Collin; Gilles Walch; Yoshiaki Toyama
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Consequences of reaming with flat and convex reamers for bone volume and surface area of the glenoid; a basic science study.

Authors:  Anne Karelse; Steven Leuridan; Alexander Van Tongel; Philippe Debeer; Jos Van Der Sloten; Kathleen Denis; Lieven F De Wilde
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  A computed tomography analysis of three-dimensional glenoid orientation modified by glenoid torsion.

Authors:  Noboru Matsumura; Satoshi Oki; Taku Suzuki; Takuji Iwamoto; Kazuki Sato; Masaya Nakamura; Morio Matsumoto; Takeo Nagura
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2018-09-21

Review 9.  Preoperative glenoid considerations for shoulder arthroplasty: a review.

Authors:  Stephen Gates; Brain Sager; Michael Khazzam
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2020-03-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.