Literature DB >> 22521164

Rapid screening of aquatic toxicity of several metal-based nanoparticles using the MetPLATE™ bioassay.

Lok R Pokhrel1, Thilini Silva, Brajesh Dubey, Amro M El Badawy, Thabet M Tolaymat, Phillip R Scheuerman.   

Abstract

Current understanding of potential toxicity of engineered nanomaterials to aquatic microorganisms is limited for risk assessment and management. Here we evaluate if the MetPLATE™ test can be used as an effective and rapid screening tool to test for potential aquatic toxicity of various metal-based nanoparticles (NPs). The MetPLATE bioassay is a heavy metal sensitive test based on β-galactosidase activity in Escherichia coli. Five different types of metal-based NPs were screened for toxicity: (1) citrate coated nAg (Citrate-nanosilver), (2) polyvinylpyrrolidone coated nAg (PVP-nAg), (3) uncoated nZnO, (4) uncoated nTiO(2) and (5) 1-Octadecylamine coated CdSe Quantum Dots (CdSe QDs); and compared with their corresponding ionic salt toxicity. Citrate-nAg was further fractionated into clean Citrate-nAg, unclean Citrate-nAg and permeate using a tangential flow filtration (TFF) system to eliminate residual ions and impurities from the stock Citrate-nAg suspension and also to differentiate between ionic- versus nano-specific toxicity. Our results showed that nAg, nZnO and CdSe QDs were less toxic than their corresponding ionic salts tested, while nano- or ionic form of TiO(2) was not toxic as high as 2.5 g L(-1) to the MetPLATE™ bacteria. Although coating-dependent toxicity was noticeable between two types of Ag NPs evaluated, particle size and surface charge were not adequate to explain the observed toxicity; hence, the toxicity appeared to be material-specific. Overall, the toxicity followed the trend: CdCl(2)>AgNO(3)>PVP-nAg>unclean Citrate-nAg>clean Citrate-nAg>ZnSO(4)>nZnO>CdSe QDs>nTiO(2)/TiO(2). These results indicate that an evaluation of β-galactosidase inhibition in MetPLATE™ E. coli can be an important consideration for rapid screening of metal-based NP toxicity, and should facilitate ecological risk assessment of these emerging contaminants.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22521164     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

Review 1.  Toxicity of engineered nanoparticles in the environment.

Authors:  Melissa A Maurer-Jones; Ian L Gunsolus; Catherine J Murphy; Christy L Haynes
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 2.  Nanomaterials in Wound Healing and Infection Control.

Authors:  Ali Pormohammad; Nadia K Monych; Sougata Ghosh; Diana L Turner; Raymond J Turner
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-21

3.  Exposure of stevia (Stevia rebaudiana B.) to silver nanoparticles in vitro: transport and accumulation.

Authors:  Celia G Castro-González; Lino Sánchez-Segura; Fernando C Gómez-Merino; Jericó J Bello-Bello
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Microarray analysis of the Escherichia coli response to CdTe-GSH Quantum Dots: understanding the bacterial toxicity of semiconductor nanoparticles.

Authors:  Juan P Monrás; Bernardo Collao; Roberto C Molina-Quiroz; Gonzalo A Pradenas; Luis A Saona; Vicente Durán-Toro; Nicolás Ordenes-Aenishanslins; Felipe A Venegas; David E Loyola; Denisse Bravo; Paulina F Calderón; Iván L Calderón; Claudio C Vásquez; Thomas G Chasteen; Desiré A Lopez; José M Pérez-Donoso
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.969

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.