Literature DB >> 22521109

2012 update of French guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Karine Briot1, Bernard Cortet, Thierry Thomas, Maurice Audran, Hubert Blain, Véronique Breuil, Laure Chapuis, Roland Chapurlat, Patrice Fardellone, Jean-Marc Feron, Jean-Bernard Gauvain, Pascal Guggenbuhl, Sami Kolta, Eric Lespessailles, Brigitte Letombe, Christian Marcelli, Philippe Orcel, Patrick Seret, Florence Trémollières, Christian Roux.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To update the evidence-based position statement published by the French National Authority for Health (HAS) in 2006 regarding the pharmacological treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, under the auspices of the French Society for Rheumatology and Groupe de Recherche et d'Information sur les Ostéoporoses (GRIO), and with the participation of several learned societies (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français, Groupe d'Étude de la Ménopause et du Vieillissement hormonal, Société Française de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Société Française d'Endocrinologie, and Société Française de Gériatrie et de Gérontologie).
METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel representing the spectrum of clinical specialties involved in managing patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis developed updated recommendations based on a systematic literature review conducted according to the method advocated by the HAS.
RESULTS: The updated recommendations underline the need for osteoporosis pharmacotherapy in women with a history of severe osteoporotic fracture. In these patients, any osteoporosis medication can be used; however, zoledronic acid is the preferred first-line medication after a hip fracture. In patients with non-severe fractures or no fractures, the appropriateness of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy depends on the bone mineral density and FRAX(®) values; any osteoporosis medication can be used, but raloxifene and ibandronate should be reserved for patients at low risk for peripheral fractures. Initially, osteoporosis pharmacotherapy should be prescribed for 5 years. The results of the evaluation done at the end of the 5-year period determine whether further treatment is in order.
CONCLUSIONS: These updated recommendations are intended to provide clinicians with clarifications about the pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis.
Copyright © 2012 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22521109     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2012.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Joint Bone Spine        ISSN: 1297-319X            Impact factor:   4.929


  36 in total

1.  Access to fracture risk assessment by FRAX and linked National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) guidance in the UK-an analysis of anonymous website activity.

Authors:  E V McCloskey; H Johansson; N C Harvey; J Compston; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Techniques in Osteoporotic and Traumatic Fractures.

Authors:  Valérie Bousson; Bassam Hamze; Guillaume Odri; Thomas Funck-Brentano; Philippe Orcel; Jean-Denis Laredo
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: evaluation of the Amiens University Hospital's fracture liaison service between January 2010 and December 2011.

Authors:  N Dehamchia-Rehailia; D Ursu; I Henry-Desailly; P Fardellone; J Paccou
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Validation of FRAX and the impact of self-reported falls among elderly in a general population: the HUNT study, Norway.

Authors:  M Hoff; H E Meyer; S Skurtveit; A Langhammer; A J Søgaard; U Syversen; A Dhainaut; E Skovlund; B Abrahamsen; B Schei
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Use of calcium supplements, vitamin D supplements and specific osteoporosis drugs among French women aged 75-85 years: patterns of use and associated factors.

Authors:  Karine Castro-Lionard; Patricia Dargent-Molina; Christophe Fermanian; Régis Gonthier; Bernard Cassou
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Profile of Women Initiated on Denosumab and Pattern of Use in a Restricted Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Indication: A French Database Analysis Over the Period 2013-2014.

Authors:  Corinne Emery; Julie Gourmelen; Francis Fagnani; Florence Suzan; Gaëlle Desamericq; Patrice Fardellone
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 7.  A systematic review of intervention thresholds based on FRAX : A report prepared for the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group and the International Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper; Helena Johansson; Anders Odén; Eugene V McCloskey
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.617

8.  Possible FRAX-based intervention thresholds for a cohort of Chinese postmenopausal women.

Authors:  E Cheung; C-L Cheung; A W C Kung; K C B Tan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Guidance for the diagnosis, prevention and therapy of osteoporosis in Italy.

Authors:  Luisella Cianferotti; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2012-12-20

10.  The FRAX-based Lebanese osteoporosis treatment guidelines: rationale for a hybrid model.

Authors:  M Chakhtoura; W D Leslie; M McClung; A M Cheung; G El-Hajj Fuleihan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.