Literature DB >> 22521099

The use of Bayesian networks for nanoparticle risk forecasting: model formulation and baseline evaluation.

Eric S Money1, Kenneth H Reckhow, Mark R Wiesner.   

Abstract

We describe the use of Bayesian networks as a tool for nanomaterial risk forecasting and develop a baseline probabilistic model that incorporates nanoparticle specific characteristics and environmental parameters, along with elements of exposure potential, hazard, and risk related to nanomaterials. The baseline model, FINE (Forecasting the Impacts of Nanomaterials in the Environment), was developed using expert elicitation techniques. The Bayesian nature of FINE allows for updating as new data become available, a critical feature for forecasting risk in the context of nanomaterials. The specific case of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) in aquatic environments is presented here (FINE(AgNP)). The results of this study show that Bayesian networks provide a robust method for formally incorporating expert judgments into a probabilistic measure of exposure and risk to nanoparticles, particularly when other knowledge bases may be lacking. The model is easily adapted and updated as additional experimental data and other information on nanoparticle behavior in the environment become available. The baseline model suggests that, within the bounds of uncertainty as currently quantified, nanosilver may pose the greatest potential risk as these particles accumulate in aquatic sediments.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22521099     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  7 in total

Review 1.  Characterization of engineered TiO₂ nanomaterials in a life cycle and risk assessments perspective.

Authors:  Véronique Adam; Stéphanie Loyaux-Lawniczak; Gaetana Quaranta
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Nanotechnology and artificial intelligence to enable sustainable and precision agriculture.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Zhiling Guo; Sami Ullah; Georgia Melagraki; Antreas Afantitis; Iseult Lynch
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 15.793

3.  A Tractable Method for Measuring Nanomaterial Risk Using Bayesian Networks.

Authors:  Finbarr Murphy; Barry Sheehan; Martin Mullins; Hans Bouwmeester; Hans J P Marvin; Yamine Bouzembrak; Anna L Costa; Rasel Das; Vicki Stone; Syed A M Tofail
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 4.703

4.  Hazard Screening Methods for Nanomaterials: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Barry Sheehan; Finbarr Murphy; Martin Mullins; Irini Furxhi; Anna L Costa; Felice C Simeone; Paride Mantecca
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-02-25       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Needs and challenges for assessing the environmental impacts of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs).

Authors:  Michelle Romero-Franco; Hilary A Godwin; Muhammad Bilal; Yoram Cohen
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.649

6.  Advancing the Understanding of Environmental Transformations, Bioavailability and Effects of Nanomaterials, an International US Environmental Protection Agency-UK Environmental Nanoscience Initiative Joint Program.

Authors:  Mitch M Lasat; Kian Fan Chung; Jamie Lead; Steve McGrath; Richard J Owen; Sophie Rocks; Jason Unrine; Junfeng Zhang
Journal:  J Environ Prot (Irvine, Calif)       Date:  2018-04-02

7.  Risk Governance of Nanomaterials: Review of Criteria and Tools for Risk Communication, Evaluation, and Mitigation.

Authors:  Panagiotis Isigonis; Danail Hristozov; Christina Benighaus; Elisa Giubilato; Khara Grieger; Lisa Pizzol; Elena Semenzin; Igor Linkov; Alex Zabeo; Antonio Marcomini
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 5.076

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.