BACKGROUND: There is no consensus for the best testicular sperm extraction (TESE) technique in patients with "low-chance" nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). OBJECTIVE: To determine sperm retrieval rates in an intraindividual comparison using three locations of the testicle with and without the assistance of a microscope (microsurgical TESE [M-TESE]). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A series of 65 patients with low-chance NOA presenting with low testicular volume (<8 ml) and high serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (>12.4 IU/l) underwent trifocal-TESE plus M-TESE bilaterally (four biopsies per testis). INTERVENTION: Sperm retrieval was performed as trifocal-TESE (upper, middle, and lower testicular pole) with and without the assistance of a microscope in the middle incision. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The number of evaluated tubules, the mean spermatogenetic scores, and the sperm retrieval rates were evaluated to determine retrieval locations and the use of the microscope. The Friedman and Cochrane Q tests were applied to determine statistical differences. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used for the analysis of serum FSH and testicular volume as preoperative prognostic factors. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The sperm retrieval success of 66.2% using the combined technique, meaning the percentage of patients with at least one tubule containing elongated spermatids, was the highest in the combination of trifocal- and M-TESE (p<0.01), indicating this technique as optimal for patients with low-chance NOA. M-TESE and trifocal-TESE alone were not significantly better. The mean spermatogenetic score giving the number of tubules with elongated spermatids in relation to all tubules was significantly higher in M-TESE versus conventional TESE (p<0.01), indicating the superior quality of the tissue harvested using the microscope. These results are limited by the definition of "success" using "one" spermatid/tubule. Preoperatively, high serum FSH and low testicular volumes did not exclude successful sperm retrieval. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of trifocal- and M-TESE is the best technique to reach high sperm retrieval rates in patients with low-chance NOA.
BACKGROUND: There is no consensus for the best testicular sperm extraction (TESE) technique in patients with "low-chance" nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). OBJECTIVE: To determine sperm retrieval rates in an intraindividual comparison using three locations of the testicle with and without the assistance of a microscope (microsurgical TESE [M-TESE]). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A series of 65 patients with low-chance NOA presenting with low testicular volume (<8 ml) and high serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (>12.4 IU/l) underwent trifocal-TESE plus M-TESE bilaterally (four biopsies per testis). INTERVENTION: Sperm retrieval was performed as trifocal-TESE (upper, middle, and lower testicular pole) with and without the assistance of a microscope in the middle incision. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The number of evaluated tubules, the mean spermatogenetic scores, and the sperm retrieval rates were evaluated to determine retrieval locations and the use of the microscope. The Friedman and Cochrane Q tests were applied to determine statistical differences. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used for the analysis of serum FSH and testicular volume as preoperative prognostic factors. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The sperm retrieval success of 66.2% using the combined technique, meaning the percentage of patients with at least one tubule containing elongated spermatids, was the highest in the combination of trifocal- and M-TESE (p<0.01), indicating this technique as optimal for patients with low-chance NOA. M-TESE and trifocal-TESE alone were not significantly better. The mean spermatogenetic score giving the number of tubules with elongated spermatids in relation to all tubules was significantly higher in M-TESE versus conventional TESE (p<0.01), indicating the superior quality of the tissue harvested using the microscope. These results are limited by the definition of "success" using "one" spermatid/tubule. Preoperatively, high serum FSH and low testicular volumes did not exclude successful sperm retrieval. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of trifocal- and M-TESE is the best technique to reach high sperm retrieval rates in patients with low-chance NOA.
Authors: Bora Altinkilic; Adrian Pilatz; Thorsten Diemer; Julia Wolf; Martin Bergmann; Sarah Schönbrunn; Uwe Ligges; Hans-Christian Schuppe; Wolfgang Weidner Journal: World J Urol Date: 2017-04-20 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: J Ullrich Schwarzer; Heiko Steinfatt; Manfred Schleyer; Frank M Köhn; Klaus Fiedler; Irene von Hertwig; Gottfried Krüsmann; Wolfgang Würfel Journal: Asian J Androl Date: 2013-09-09 Impact factor: 3.285
Authors: Campbell F Bryson; Ranjith Ramasamy; Matthew Sheehan; Gianpiero D Palermo; Zev Rosenwaks; Peter N Schlegel Journal: J Urol Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 7.450