Literature DB >> 22520989

Electrocardiographic differentiation of early repolarization from subtle anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Stephen W Smith1, Ayesha Khalil, Timothy D Henry, Melissa Rosas, Richard J Chang, Kimberly Heller, Erik Scharrer, Mina Ghorashi, Lesly A Pearce.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) can be difficult to differentiate from early repolarization on the ECG. We hypothesize that, in addition to ST-segment elevation, T-wave amplitude to R-wave amplitude ratio (T-wave amplitude(avg)/R-wave amplitude(avg)), and R-wave amplitude in leads V2 to V4, computerized corrected QT interval (QTc) and upward concavity would help to differentiate the 2. We seek to determine which ECG measurements best distinguish STEMI versus early repolarization.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with anterior STEMI (2003 to 2009) and early repolarization (2003 to 2005) at 2 urban hospitals, one of which (Minneapolis Heart Institute) receives 500 STEMI patients per year. We compared the ECGs of nonobvious ("subtle") anterior STEMI with emergency department noncardiac chest pain patients with early repolarization. ST-segment elevation at the J point and 60 ms after the J point, T-wave amplitude, R-wave amplitude, QTc, upward concavity, J-wave notching, and T waves in V1 and V6 were measured. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to identify ECG measurements independently predictive of STEMI versus early repolarization in a derivation group and was subsequently validated in a separate group.
RESULTS: Of 355 anterior STEMIs identified, 143 were nonobvious, or subtle, compared with 171 early repolarization ECGs. ST-segment elevation was greater, R-wave amplitude lower, and T-wave amplitude(avg)/R-wave amplitude(avg) higher in leads V2 to V4 with STEMI versus early repolarization. Computerized QTc was also significantly longer with STEMI versus early repolarization. T-wave amplitude did not differ significantly between the groups, such that the T-wave amplitude(avg)/R-wave amplitude(avg) difference was entirely due to the difference in R-wave amplitude. An ECG criterion based on 3 measurements (R-wave amplitude in lead V4, ST-segment elevation 60 ms after J-point in lead V3, and QTc) was derived and validated for differentiating STEMI versus early repolarization, such that if the value of the equation ([1.196 x ST-segment elevation 60 ms after the J point in lead V3 in mm]+[0.059 x QTc in ms]-[0.326 x R-wave amplitude in lead V4 in mm]) is greater than 23.4 predicted STEMI and if less than or equal to 23.4, it predicted early repolarization in both groups, with overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 86% (95% confidence interval [CI] 79, 91), 91% (95% CI 85, 95), and 88% (95% CI 84, 92), respectively, with positive likelihood ratio 9.2 (95% CI 8.5 to 10) and negative likelihood ratio 0.1 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.3). Upward concavity, upright T wave in V1 or T wave, in V1 greater than T wave in V6, and J-wave notching did not provide important information.
CONCLUSION: R-wave amplitude is lower, ST-segment elevation greater, and QTc longer for subtle anterior STEMI versus early repolarization. In combination with other clinical data, this derived and validated ECG equation could be an important adjunct in the diagnosis of anterior STEMI.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22520989     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  14 in total

Review 1.  The year of 2012 in electrocardiology.

Authors:  Shlomo Stern
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Time for a new paradigm shift in myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Emre K Aslanger; H Pendell Meyers; Stephen W Smith
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.596

3.  Novel ECG changes in acute coronary syndromes. Would improvement in the recognition of 'STEMI-equivalents' affect time until reperfusion?

Authors:  Joshua Wall; Leigh D White; Astin Lee
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  A tale of two formulas: Differentiation of subtle anterior MI from benign ST segment elevation.

Authors:  Emrah Bozbeyoğlu; Emre Aslanger; Özlem Yıldırımtürk; Barış Şimşek; Can Yücel Karabay; Mustafa Aytek Şimşek; Ahmet İlker Tekkeşin; Muzaffer Değertekin; Ömer Kozan
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 5.  Early repolarization syndrome: electrocardiographic signs and clinical implications.

Authors:  Ciprian Rezus; Mariana Floria; Victor Dan Moga; Oana Sirbu; Nicoleta Dima; Simona Daniela Ionescu; Valentin Ambarus
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 6.  The Interdisciplinary Management of Acute Chest Pain.

Authors:  Raphael R Bruno; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff; Wolfgang Söllner; Thomas Frieling; Christian Müller; Michael Christ
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 7.  [High-risk ECGs in acute chest pain : Signs of acute ischemia beyond STEMI].

Authors:  Klaus Fessele; Martin Fandler; Philipp Gotthardt
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 1.552

8.  ST elevation: Differential diagnosis and caveats. A comprehensive review to help distinguish ST elevation myocardial infarction from nonischemic etiologies of ST elevation.

Authors:  Erwin Christian de Bliek
Journal:  Turk J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-02-17

9.  Physician accuracy in interpreting potential ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction electrocardiograms.

Authors:  James M McCabe; Ehrin J Armstrong; Ivy Ku; Ameya Kulkarni; Kurt S Hoffmayer; Prashant D Bhave; Stephen W Waldo; Priscilla Hsue; John C Stein; Gregory M Marcus; Scott Kinlay; Peter Ganz
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 10.  ECG Parameters for Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmias: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Satria Mandala; Tham Cai Di
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 1.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.