BACKGROUND: The OAT study randomized 2,201 patients with a totally occluded infarct-related artery on days 3 to 28 (>24 hours) after myocardial infarction (MI) to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or medical treatment (MED). There was no difference in the primary end point of death, reinfarction, or heart failure at 2.9 or 6-year mean follow-up. However, in patients randomized to PCI, there was a trend toward a higher rate of reinfarction. METHODS: We analyzed the characteristics and types of reinfarction according to the universal definition. Independent predictors of reinfarction were determined using Cox proportional hazard models with follow-up up to 9 years. RESULTS: There were 169 reinfarctions: 9.4% PCI vs 8.0% MED, hazard ratio 1.31, 95% CI 0.97-1.77, P = .08. Spontaneous reinfarction (type 1) occurred with similar frequency in the groups: 4.9% PCI vs 6.7% MED, hazard ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.53-1.15, P = .21. Rates of type 2 (secondary) and 3 (sudden death) MI were similar in both groups. There was an increase in type 4a reinfarctions (related to protocol or other PCI) (0.8% PCI vs 0.1% MED, P = .01) and type 4b reinfarctions (stent thrombosis) (2.7% PCI vs 0.6% MED, P < .001). Multivariate predictors of reinfarction were history of PCI before study entry (P = .001), diabetes (P = .005), and absence of new Q waves with the index infarction (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: There was a trend for reinfarctions to be more frequent with PCI. Opening an occluded infarct-related artery in stable patients with late post-MI may expose them to a risk of subsequent reinfarction related to reocclusion and stent thrombosis.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The OAT study randomized 2,201 patients with a totally occluded infarct-related artery on days 3 to 28 (>24 hours) after myocardial infarction (MI) to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or medical treatment (MED). There was no difference in the primary end point of death, reinfarction, or heart failure at 2.9 or 6-year mean follow-up. However, in patients randomized to PCI, there was a trend toward a higher rate of reinfarction. METHODS: We analyzed the characteristics and types of reinfarction according to the universal definition. Independent predictors of reinfarction were determined using Cox proportional hazard models with follow-up up to 9 years. RESULTS: There were 169 reinfarctions: 9.4% PCI vs 8.0% MED, hazard ratio 1.31, 95% CI 0.97-1.77, P = .08. Spontaneous reinfarction (type 1) occurred with similar frequency in the groups: 4.9% PCI vs 6.7% MED, hazard ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.53-1.15, P = .21. Rates of type 2 (secondary) and 3 (sudden death) MI were similar in both groups. There was an increase in type 4a reinfarctions (related to protocol or other PCI) (0.8% PCI vs 0.1% MED, P = .01) and type 4b reinfarctions (stent thrombosis) (2.7% PCI vs 0.6% MED, P < .001). Multivariate predictors of reinfarction were history of PCI before study entry (P = .001), diabetes (P = .005), and absence of new Q waves with the index infarction (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: There was a trend for reinfarctions to be more frequent with PCI. Opening an occluded infarct-related artery in stable patients with late post-MI may expose them to a risk of subsequent reinfarction related to reocclusion and stent thrombosis.
Authors: Vladimír Dzavík; Christopher E Buller; Gervasio A Lamas; James M Rankin; G B John Mancini; Warren J Cantor; Ronald J Carere; John R Ross; Deborah Atchison; Sandra Forman; Boban Thomas; Pawel Buszman; Carlos Vozzi; Anthony Glanz; Eric A Cohen; Peter Meciar; Gerald Devlin; Alice Mascette; George Sopko; Genell L Knatterud; Judith S Hochman Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-11-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Judith S Hochman; Gervasio A Lamas; Genell L Knatterud; Christopher E Buller; Vladimir Dzavik; Daniel B Mark; Harmony R Reynolds; Harvey D White Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Italo Porto; Joseph B Selvanayagam; William J Van Gaal; Francesco Prati; Adrian Cheng; Keith Channon; Stefan Neubauer; Adrian P Banning Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-08-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Steven R Steinhubl; Peter B Berger; J Tift Mann; Edward T A Fry; Augustin DeLago; Charles Wilmer; Eric J Topol Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-11-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Judith S Hochman; Gervasio A Lamas; Christopher E Buller; Vladimir Dzavik; Harmony R Reynolds; Staci J Abramsky; Sandra Forman; Witold Ruzyllo; Aldo P Maggioni; Harvey White; Zygmunt Sadowski; Antonio C Carvalho; Jamie M Rankin; Jean P Renkin; P Gabriel Steg; Alice M Mascette; George Sopko; Matthias E Pfisterer; Jonathan Leor; Viliam Fridrich; Daniel B Mark; Genell L Knatterud Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-11-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gerald S Werner; Ralf Surber; Markus Ferrari; Michael Fritzenwanger; Hans R Figulla Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2006-09-26 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Judith S Hochman; Harmony R Reynolds; Vladimír Dzavík; Christopher E Buller; Witold Ruzyllo; Zygmunt P Sadowski; Aldo P Maggioni; Antonio C Carvalho; James M Rankin; Harvey D White; Suzanne Goldberg; Sandra A Forman; Daniel B Mark; Gervasio A Lamas Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-10-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1977-01 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Ramin S Hastings; Judith S Hochman; Vladimir Dzavik; Gervasio A Lamas; Sandra A Forman; Francois Schiele; Lampros K Michalis; Dimitris Nikas; Joanna Jaroch; Harmony R Reynolds Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2012-06-22 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Kris G Vargas; Paul M Haller; Bernhard Jäger; Maximilian Tscharre; Ronald K Binder; Christian Mueller; Bertil Lindahl; Kurt Huber Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Najate Benamer; Carolina Vasquez; Vanessa M Mahoney; Maximilian J Steinhardt; William A Coetzee; Gregory E Morley Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Allan S Jaffe; Maarten L Simoons; Bernard R Chaitman; Harvey D White Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2012-08-25 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Christopher Adlbrecht; Kurt Huber; Harmony R Reynolds; Antonio C Carvalho; Vladimír Džavík; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Li Liu; Paolo Marino; Camille A Pearte; James M Rankin; Harvey D White; Gervasio A Lamas; Judith S Hochman Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Junjie Yang; David W Biery; Avinainder Singh; Sanjay Divakaran; Ersilia M DeFilippis; Wanda Y Wu; Josh Klein; Jon Hainer; Mattheus Ramsis; Pradeep Natarajan; James L Januzzi; Khurram Nasir; Deepak L Bhatt; Marcelo F Di Carli; Ron Blankstein Journal: Am J Med Date: 2019-11-09 Impact factor: 4.965