Claire E Baldwin1, Jennifer D Paratz, Andrew D Bersten. 1. Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Flinders University, Flinders Drive, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042, Australia. claire.baldwin@health.sa.gov.au
Abstract
PURPOSE: Dynamometry is an objective tool for volitional strength evaluation that may overcome the limited sensitivity of the Medical Research Council scale for manual muscle tests, particularly at grades 4 and 5. The primary aims of this study were to investigate the reliability, minimal detectable change, and time to peak muscle force, measured with portable dynamometry, in critically ill patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Isometric hand grip, elbow flexion, and knee extension were measured with portable dynamometry. RESULTS: Interrater consistency (intraclass correlation coefficient [95% confidence interval]) (0.782 [0.321-0.930] to 0.946 [0.840-0.982]) and test-retest agreement (0.819 [0.390-0.943] to 0.918 [0.779-0.970]) were acceptable for all dynamometry forces, with the exception of left elbow flexion. Despite generally good reliability, a mean change (upper 95% confidence interval) of 2.8 (7.8) kg, 1.9 (5.2) kg, and 2.6 (7.1) kg may be required from a patient's baseline force measurement of right grip, elbow flexion, and knee extension to reflect real force changes. There was also a delay in the time for critically ill patients to generate peak muscle forces, compared with healthy controls (P ≤ .001). CONCLUSIONS: Dynamometry can provide reliable measurements in alert critically ill patients, but moderate changes in strength may be required to overcome measurement error, during the acute recovery period. Deficits in force timing may reflect impaired neuromuscular control.
PURPOSE: Dynamometry is an objective tool for volitional strength evaluation that may overcome the limited sensitivity of the Medical Research Council scale for manual muscle tests, particularly at grades 4 and 5. The primary aims of this study were to investigate the reliability, minimal detectable change, and time to peak muscle force, measured with portable dynamometry, in critically illpatients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Isometric hand grip, elbow flexion, and knee extension were measured with portable dynamometry. RESULTS: Interrater consistency (intraclass correlation coefficient [95% confidence interval]) (0.782 [0.321-0.930] to 0.946 [0.840-0.982]) and test-retest agreement (0.819 [0.390-0.943] to 0.918 [0.779-0.970]) were acceptable for all dynamometry forces, with the exception of left elbow flexion. Despite generally good reliability, a mean change (upper 95% confidence interval) of 2.8 (7.8) kg, 1.9 (5.2) kg, and 2.6 (7.1) kg may be required from a patient's baseline force measurement of right grip, elbow flexion, and knee extension to reflect real force changes. There was also a delay in the time for critically illpatients to generate peak muscle forces, compared with healthy controls (P ≤ .001). CONCLUSIONS: Dynamometry can provide reliable measurements in alert critically illpatients, but moderate changes in strength may be required to overcome measurement error, during the acute recovery period. Deficits in force timing may reflect impaired neuromuscular control.
Authors: Timothy F Platts-Mills; Sean A Flannigan; Andrey V Bortsov; Samantha Smith; Robert M Domeier; Robert A Swor; Phyllis L Hendry; David A Peak; Niels K Rathlev; Jeffrey S Jones; David C Lee; Francis J Keefe; Philip D Sloane; Samuel A McLean Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2015-06-16 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Selina M Parry; Catherine L Granger; Sue Berney; Jennifer Jones; Lisa Beach; Doa El-Ansary; René Koopman; Linda Denehy Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2015-02-05 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: O Friedrich; M B Reid; G Van den Berghe; I Vanhorebeek; G Hermans; M M Rich; L Larsson Journal: Physiol Rev Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 37.312
Authors: Bronwen Connolly; Lisa Salisbury; Brenda O'Neill; Louise Geneen; Abdel Douiri; Michael P W Grocott; Nicholas Hart; Timothy S Walsh; Bronagh Blackwood Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-06-22
Authors: Michelle E Kho; Alexander D Truong; Jennifer M Zanni; Nancy D Ciesla; Roy G Brower; Jeffrey B Palmer; Dale M Needham Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2014-09-22 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Selina M Parry; Sue Berney; Catherine L Granger; Danielle L Dunlop; Laura Murphy; Doa El-Ansary; René Koopman; Linda Denehy Journal: Crit Care Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Selina M Parry; Sue Berney; René Koopman; Adam Bryant; Doa El-Ansary; Zudin Puthucheary; Nicholas Hart; Stephen Warrillow; Linda Denehy Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 2.692