PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of opening- and closing-wedge valgus high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for the treatment of medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis with a minimum follow-up of 3 years, with a focus on patellofemoral alignment and anterior knee pain. METHODS: We performed a retrospective comparison of 50 patients who underwent closing-wedge HTO and 50 patients who underwent opening-wedge HTO for isolated medial joint arthritis of the knee with varus deformity. All patients were evaluated and the 2 study groups were compared after a minimum follow-up of 3 years with a focus on patellofemoral alignment, patellofemoral osteoarthritis, and anterior knee pain while climbing stairs. RESULTS: Patellar alignment (patellar tilt and lateral patellar displacement) was not significantly different in the 2 groups either preoperatively or at follow-up. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the extent of patellofemoral arthritis and incidence of anterior knee pain at follow-up between the 2 groups. In addition, no significant intergroup difference was found in terms of the incidence of anterior knee pain (28% in closing-wedge group and 32% in opening-wedge group at follow-up). CONCLUSIONS: The results of closing- and opening-wedge valgus HTO were not found to be significantly different with respect to patellar alignment, osteoarthritis of the patellofemoral joint, or anterior knee pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of opening- and closing-wedge valgus high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for the treatment of medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis with a minimum follow-up of 3 years, with a focus on patellofemoral alignment and anterior knee pain. METHODS: We performed a retrospective comparison of 50 patients who underwent closing-wedge HTO and 50 patients who underwent opening-wedge HTO for isolated medial joint arthritis of the knee with varus deformity. All patients were evaluated and the 2 study groups were compared after a minimum follow-up of 3 years with a focus on patellofemoral alignment, patellofemoral osteoarthritis, and anterior knee pain while climbing stairs. RESULTS: Patellar alignment (patellar tilt and lateral patellar displacement) was not significantly different in the 2 groups either preoperatively or at follow-up. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the extent of patellofemoral arthritis and incidence of anterior knee pain at follow-up between the 2 groups. In addition, no significant intergroup difference was found in terms of the incidence of anterior knee pain (28% in closing-wedge group and 32% in opening-wedge group at follow-up). CONCLUSIONS: The results of closing- and opening-wedge valgus HTO were not found to be significantly different with respect to patellar alignment, osteoarthritis of the patellofemoral joint, or anterior knee pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Authors: J Amzallag; Nicolas Pujol; A Maqdes; P Beaufils; T Judet; Y Catonne Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2012-11-25 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: N van Egmond; S van Grinsven; C J M van Loon; R D Gaasbeek; A van Kampen Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2014-09-13 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Allison J Rao; Brandon J Erickson; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Adam B Yanke; Bernard R Bach; Brian J Cole Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2015-10-23