Literature DB >> 22520404

How reliable are cultures of specimens from superficial swabs compared with those of deep tissue in patients with diabetic foot ulcers?

Mesut Mutluoglu1, Günalp Uzun, Vedat Turhan, Levent Gorenek, Hakan Ay, Benjamin A Lipsky.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the reliability of cultures of superficial swabs (SS) by comparing them with cultures of concomitantly obtained deep tissue (DT) specimens in patients with diabetic foot ulcers.
METHODS: We reviewed clinical and microbiological data from patients with diabetes who presented during a two-year period to our hyperbaric medicine center with a foot ulcer. We identified patients who had at least one concomitantly collected SS and DT pair of specimens sent for culture.
RESULTS: A total of 89 culture pairs were available from 54 eligible patients, 33 (61.1%) of whom were hospitalized. Wounds were infected in 47 (87.0%) of the patients and 28 (51.9%) patients had received antibiotic therapy within the previous month. Overall, 65 (73%) of the SS and DT pairs had identical culture results, but in 11 (16.9%) cases the cultures were sterile; thus, only 54 (69.2%) of the 78 culture-positive pairs had identical results. Compared with DT, SS cultures yielded ≥1 extra organism in 10 (11.2%) cases, missed at least one organism in 8 (9.0%), and were completely different in 6 (6.7%). When compared to DT culture results, SS cultures had a positive predictive value of 84.4%, negative predictive value of 44.0%, and overall accuracy of 73.0%.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with diabetic foot ulcers, results of specimens for culture taken by SS did not correlate well with those obtained by DT. This suggests that SS specimens may be less reliable for guiding antimicrobial therapy than DT specimens.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22520404     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2012.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Complications        ISSN: 1056-8727            Impact factor:   2.852


  14 in total

1.  Diabetic foot complications in a secondary foot hospital: A clinical audit.

Authors:  Ibrahim Ismail; Ashwini Dhanapathy; Arjun Gandhi; Shanthi Kannan
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2015-04-30

Review 2.  The microbiologic profile of diabetic foot infections in Turkey: a 20-year systematic review: diabetic foot infections in Turkey.

Authors:  M Hatipoglu; M Mutluoglu; G Uzun; E Karabacak; V Turhan; B A Lipsky
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Wound samples: moving towards a standardised method of collection and analysis.

Authors:  Sarah Ramsay; Linda Cowan; Jeffrey M Davidson; Lillian Nanney; Gregory Schultz
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  The ABC's of wound care.

Authors:  Kelly Bumpus; Michael A Maier
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Are clindamycin and ciprofloxacin appropriate for the empirical treatment of diabetic foot infections?

Authors:  M G de Vries; M B Ekkelenkamp; E J G Peters
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Prevalence and microbiological characteristics of clinically infected foot-ulcers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective exploratory study.

Authors:  Pauline Fitzgerald; Heidi J Siddle; Michael R Backhouse; E Andrea Nelson
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-08-16       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  Distinct polymicrobial populations in a chronic foot ulcer with implications for diagnostics and anti-infective therapy.

Authors:  Can Imirzalioglu; Shneh Sethi; Christian Schneider; Torsten Hain; Trinad Chakraborty; Peter Mayser; Eugen Domann
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-03-29

8.  Point-of-care autofluorescence imaging for real-time sampling and treatment guidance of bioburden in chronic wounds: first-in-human results.

Authors:  Ralph S DaCosta; Iris Kulbatski; Liis Lindvere-Teene; Danielle Starr; Kristina Blackmore; Jason I Silver; Julie Opoku; Yichao Charlie Wu; Philip J Medeiros; Wei Xu; Lizhen Xu; Brian C Wilson; Cheryl Rosen; Ron Linden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Diagnosing diabetic foot osteomyelitis in patients without signs of soft tissue infection by coupling hybrid 67Ga SPECT/CT with bedside percutaneous bone puncture.

Authors:  Elisabeth Aslangul; Jocelyne M'bemba; Nadine Caillat-Vigneron; Sophie Coignard; Etienne Larger; Christian Boitard; Benjamin A Lipsky
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  CODIFI (Concordance in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Infection): a cross-sectional study of wound swab versus tissue sampling in infected diabetic foot ulcers in England.

Authors:  Andrea Nelson; Alexandra Wright-Hughes; Michael Ross Backhouse; Benjamin A Lipsky; Jane Nixon; Moninder S Bhogal; Catherine Reynolds; Sarah Brown
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.