Literature DB >> 22520059

Viewing a needle pricking a hand that you perceive as yours enhances unpleasantness of pain.

Marion Höfle1, Michael Hauck, Andreas K Engel, Daniel Senkowski.   

Abstract

"Don't look and it won't hurt" is commonly heard advice when receiving an injection, which implies that observing needle pricks enhances pain perception. Throughout our lives, we repeatedly learn that sharp objects cause pain when penetrating our skin, but situational expectations, like information given by the clinician prior to an injection, may also influence how viewing needle pricks affects forthcoming pain. How both previous experiences and acute situational expectations related to viewing needle pricks modulate pain perception is unknown. We presented participants with video clips of a hand perceived as their own being either pricked by a needle or touched by a Q-tip, while concurrently applying painful or nonpainful electrical stimuli. Intensity and unpleasantness ratings, as well as pupil dilation responses, were monitored. Effects of situational expectations about the strength of electrical stimuli were investigated by manipulating the contingency between clips and electrical stimuli across experimental blocks. Participants were explicitly informed about the contingency. Intensity ratings of electrical stimuli were higher when a clip was associated with expectation of painful compared to nonpainful stimuli, suggesting that situational expectations about forthcoming pain bias perceived intensity. Unpleasantness ratings and pupil dilation responses were higher when participants viewed a needle prick, compared to when they viewed a Q-tip touch, suggesting that previous experiences with viewing needle pricks primarily act upon perceived unpleasantness. Thus, remote painful experiences with viewing needle pricks, together with information given prior to an injection, differentially shape the impact of viewing a needle prick on pain perception.
Copyright © 2012 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22520059     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  17 in total

1.  Motivated action: Pupil diameter during active coping.

Authors:  Christopher T Sege; Margaret M Bradley; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  The efficacy of 95-Hz topical vibration in pain reduction for trigger finger injection: a placebo-controlled, prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Kevin W Park; Martin I Boyer; Ryan P Calfee; Charles A Goldfarb; Daniel A Osei
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 2.230

3.  Intense pain influences the cortical processing of visual stimuli projected onto the sensitized skin.

Authors:  Diana M E Torta; Emanuel N Van Den Broeke; Lieve Filbrich; Benvenuto Jacob; Julien Lambert; André Mouraux
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.926

4.  Factors associated with the modulation of pain by visual distortion of body size.

Authors:  Michihiro Osumi; Ryota Imai; Kozo Ueta; Hideki Nakano; Satoshi Nobusako; Shu Morioka
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Rubber hand illusion reduces discomfort caused by cold stimulus.

Authors:  Marta Siedlecka; Anna Klimza; Marta Łukowska; Michał Wierzchoń
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Looking at the hand modulates the brain responses to nociceptive and non-nociceptive somatosensory stimuli but does not necessarily modulate their perception.

Authors:  Diana M Torta; Valéry Legrain; André Mouraux
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Modifying Bodily Self-Awareness during Acupuncture Needle Stimulation Using the Rubber Hand Illusion.

Authors:  Dong-Seon Chang; Yun-Ji Kim; Soon-Ho Lee; Hyejung Lee; In-Seon Lee; Hi-Joon Park; Christian Wallraven; Younbyoung Chae
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 2.629

8.  Viewing the body modulates both pain sensations and pain responses.

Authors:  Brianna Beck; Elisabetta Làdavas; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Is it safe to use local anesthesia with adrenaline in hand surgery? WALANT technique.

Authors:  Pedro José Pires Neto; Leonardo de Andrade Moreira; Priscilla Pires de Las Casas
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2017-07-19

10.  Mechanical Pain Thresholds and the Rubber Hand Illusion.

Authors:  Anna Bauer; Julia Hagenburger; Tina Plank; Volker Busch; Mark W Greenlee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.