Literature DB >> 22519659

The relationship between anogenital distance and azoospermia in adult men.

Michael L Eisenberg1, Michael Shy, R Chanc Walters, Larry I Lipshultz.   

Abstract

Anogenital distance (AGD) is a marker for endocrine disruption in animal studies in which decreased male AGD has been associated with testicular dysfunction. The objective of the study was to investigate whether anogenital distance could distinguish men with obstructive azoospermia (OA) from those with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). To accomplish this, azoospermic men were recruited and evaluated at a men's reproductive health clinic in Houston, TX. Anogenital distance (the distance from the posterior aspect of the scrotum to the anal verge) and penile length (PL) were measured using digital calipers. Testis size was estimated by physical examination. Logistic regression was used to compare AGD lengths in men with OA and men with NOA. A total of 69 OA men (mean age: 44.2 ± 9.2) and 29 NOA men (mean age: 32.8 ± 4.8) were recruited. The NOA men possessed significantly shorter mean AGD than the men with OA (AGD: 36.3 vs. 41.9 mm, p = 0.01). An AGD of less than 30 mm, had a 91% specificity in accurately classifying NOA. Moreover, after adjustment for age, race, and BMI, an AGD of less than 30 mm yielded a significantly increased odds of NOA compared to OA (OR 5.6, 95% CI 1.0, 30.7). In summary, AGD may provide a novel metric for assessing testicular function in men and in distinguishing OA from NOA.
© 2012 The Authors. International Journal of Andrology © 2012 European Academy of Andrology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22519659     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2012.01275.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Androl        ISSN: 0105-6263


  16 in total

1.  Evidence for sexually dimorphic associations between maternal characteristics and anogenital distance, a marker of reproductive development.

Authors:  Emily S Barrett; Lauren E Parlett; J Bruce Redmon; Shanna H Swan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Windows of sensitivity to toxic chemicals in the development of reproductive effects: an analysis of ATSDR's toxicological profile database.

Authors:  Melanie C Buser; Henry G Abadin; John L Irwin; Hana R Pohl
Journal:  Int J Environ Health Res       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of human and animal evidence of prenatal diethylhexyl phthalate exposure and changes in male anogenital distance.

Authors:  David C Dorman; Weihsueh Chiu; Barbara F Hales; Russ Hauser; Kamin J Johnson; Ellen Mantus; Susan Martel; Karen A Robinson; Andrew A Rooney; Ruthann Rudel; Sheela Sathyanarayana; Susan L Schantz; Katrina M Waters
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 6.393

4.  Stability of proposed biomarkers of prenatal androgen exposure over the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  E S Barrett; L E Parlett; S H Swan
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Anogenital distance as a measure of human male fertility.

Authors:  Michael L Eisenberg; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Possible fetal determinants of male infertility.

Authors:  Anders Juul; Kristian Almstrup; Anna-Maria Andersson; Tina K Jensen; Niels Jørgensen; Katharina M Main; Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts; Jorma Toppari; Niels E Skakkebæk
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 7.  Stress and Androgen Activity During Fetal Development.

Authors:  Emily S Barrett; Shanna H Swan
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 8.  Male Reproductive Disorders and Fertility Trends: Influences of Environment and Genetic Susceptibility.

Authors:  Niels E Skakkebaek; Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts; Germaine M Buck Louis; Jorma Toppari; Anna-Maria Andersson; Michael L Eisenberg; Tina Kold Jensen; Niels Jørgensen; Shanna H Swan; Katherine J Sapra; Søren Ziebe; Lærke Priskorn; Anders Juul
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 37.312

9.  Anogenital distance and penile length in infants with hypospadias or cryptorchidism: comparison with normative data.

Authors:  Ajay Thankamony; Ngee Lek; Dan Carroll; Martyn Williams; David B Dunger; Carlo L Acerini; Ken K Ong; Ieuan A Hughes
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Anogenital distance as a marker of androgen exposure in humans.

Authors:  A Thankamony; V Pasterski; K K Ong; C L Acerini; I A Hughes
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.842

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.