Literature DB >> 22519617

Assessing RN-to-RN peer review on clinical units.

Judith A Pfeiffer1, Mary A Wickline, Jill Deetz, Elise S Berry.   

Abstract

AIM: The primary purpose of this study was to measure informal registered nurse (RN)-to-RN peer review (defined as collegial communication about the quality of nursing care) at the work-unit level.
METHODS: Survey design with cluster sampling of 28 hospital or ambulatory care units (n = 541 respondents). Results were compared with existing patient safety and satisfaction data. A chi-squared test was used to compare responses against nurse characteristics.
RESULTS: Nurses agreed that RN-to-RN peer review takes place on their units, but no correlation with patient safety and satisfaction data was found. Misunderstandings about the meaning of peer review were evident. Open-ended comments revealed barriers to peer review: fear of retribution, language barriers and lack of professionalism.
CONCLUSIONS: Nurses need clarification of peer review. Issues with common language in a professional environment need to be addressed and nurses can learn collaboration from each other's cultures. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Managers should support RN-to-RN peer review on clinical units. Methods used here may be useful to assess current departmental nurse peer review.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22519617     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01321.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurs Manag        ISSN: 0966-0429            Impact factor:   3.325


  2 in total

1.  Challenges Associated With the Concept of Collaboration.

Authors:  Leila Valizadeh; Vahid Zamanzadeh; Alireza Irajpour; Masoumeh Shohani
Journal:  Nurs Midwifery Stud       Date:  2015-06-27

2.  The meaning of collaboration, from the perspective of Iranian nurses: a qualitative study.

Authors:  V Zamanzadeh; A Irajpour; L Valizadeh; M Shohani
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-12-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.