Literature DB >> 22518053

Screening for rheumatic heart disease: evaluation of a simplified echocardiography-based approach.

Mariana Mirabel1, David S Celermajer, Beatriz Ferreira, Muriel Tafflet, Marie-Cécile Perier, Nicole Karam, Ana-Olga Mocumbi, Dinesh N Jani, Daniel Sidi, Xavier Jouven, Eloi Marijon.   

Abstract

AIMS: Portable echocardiography has emerged as a potential tool to detect rheumatic heart disease (RHD) early. Complex echocardiographic criteria used in recent epidemiological studies may be difficult to translate into daily practice in areas where the burden of RHD is greatest and skilled practitioners are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate a simplified echo approach for RHD screening among children in low-income countries. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Retrospective analysis of data from a cross-sectional echocardiography-based study carried out in 2005 through the examination of 2170 school children in Maputo, Mozambique. We aimed to evaluate the value of a reference set of criteria (defined as a combination of Doppler and morphological rheumatic features of the aortic and/or mitral valves) compared with an easy-to-use single mitral regurgitation jet-length criterion (simplified set of criteria). All suspected lesions (according to reference or simplified criteria) detected in the field by a portable echo machine were reassessed by non-portable echocardiography and then read by three independent experts. Definite RHD cases in both groups were finally ascertained according to the reference criteria. Portable echocardiography detected valve regurgitation in 208 children. According to the reference criteria, 18 children were detected with suspected RHD on site. Of these, 15 children (83%) were considered to have definite RHD, giving a prevalence of 6.9 per 1000 (95% CI: 3.9-11.4). The simplified mitral regurgitation jet-length criteria detected 12 children at school, 11 of whom were subsequently confirmed to have definite RHD, giving an estimated prevalence of 5.1 per 1000 (95% CI: 2.5-9.1) (P = 0.12, exact McNemar test). When compared with the reference criteria, the simplified approach yields a maximum sensitivity of 73% for case detection, with a positive predictive value of 92%.
CONCLUSION: Simplified echocardiography-based screening for RHD appears feasible, allowing rapid and appropriate detection of a significant number of RHD cases on site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22518053     DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jes077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


  18 in total

1.  The utility of handheld echocardiography for early rheumatic heart disease diagnosis: a field study.

Authors:  Andrea Beaton; Jimmy C Lu; Twalib Aliku; Peter Dean; Lasya Gaur; Jacqueline Weinberg; Justin Godown; Peter Lwabi; Grace Mirembe; Emmy Okello; Allison Reese; Ashley Shrestha-Astudillo; Tyler Bradley-Hewitt; Janet Scheel; Catherine Webb; Robert McCarter; Greg Ensing; Craig Sable
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  TGF-β1 and TIMP-4 regulate atrial fibrosis in atrial fibrillation secondary to rheumatic heart disease.

Authors:  Yu Sun; Zi-Yang Huang; Zhen-Hua Wang; Cui-Ping Li; Xian-Liang Meng; Yun-Jiao Zhang; Feng Su; Nan Ma
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 3.  Echocardiographic screening for subclinical rheumatic heart disease remains a research tool pending studies of impact on prognosis.

Authors:  Liesl Zühlke; Bongani M Mayosi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Screening for rheumatic heart disease: current approaches and controversies.

Authors:  Kathryn Roberts; Samantha Colquhoun; Andrew Steer; Bo Reményi; Jonathan Carapetis
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Latent rheumatic heart disease: outcomes 2 years after echocardiographic detection.

Authors:  Andrea Beaton; Emmy Okello; Twalib Aliku; Sulaiman Lubega; Peter Lwabi; Charles Mondo; Robert McCarter; Craig Sable
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 6.  Rheumatic heart disease: progress and challenges in India.

Authors:  Bela Shah; Meenakshi Sharma; Rajesh Kumar; K N Brahmadathan; Vinod Joseph Abraham; Rajan Tandon
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 1.967

7.  The natural history of latent rheumatic heart disease in a 5 year follow-up study: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Liesl Zühlke; Mark E Engel; Carolina E Lemmer; Marnie van de Wall; Simpiwe Nkepu; Alet Meiring; Michael Bestawros; Bongani M Mayosi
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  Rheumatic Heart Disease in Kerala: A Vanishing Entity? An Echo Doppler Study in 5-15-Years-Old School Children.

Authors:  Bigesh Nair; Sunitha Viswanathan; A George Koshy; Prabha Nini Gupta; Namita Nair; Ashok Thakkar
Journal:  Int J Rheumatol       Date:  2015-09-14

Review 9.  Congenital heart disease and rheumatic heart disease in Africa: recent advances and current priorities.

Authors:  Liesl Zühlke; Mariana Mirabel; Eloi Marijon
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Cardiac surgery for patients with heart failure due to structural heart disease in Uganda: access to surgery and outcomes.

Authors:  Antonio Grimaldi; Enrico Ammirati; Nicole Karam; Anna Chiara Vermi; Annalisa de Concilio; Giorgio Trucco; Francesco Aloi; Francesco Arioli; Filippo Figini; Santo Ferrarello; Francesco Maria Sacco; Renato Grottola; Paul G D'Arbela; Ottavio Alfieri; Eloi Marijon; Juergen Freers; Mariana Mirabel
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 1.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.