RATIONALE: Spatial heterogeneity in connexin (Cx) expression has been implicated in arrhythmogenesis. OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to quantify the relation between the degree of heterogeneity in Cx43 expression and disturbances in electric propagation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cell pairs and strands composed of mixtures of Cx43(-/-) (Cx43KO) or GFP-expressing Cx43(+/+) (WT(GFP)) murine ventricular myocytes were patterned using microlithographic techniques. At the interface between pairs of WT(GFP) and Cx43KO cells, dual-voltage clamp showed a marked decrease in electric coupling (approximately 5% of WT) and voltage gating suggested the presence of mixed Cx43/Cx45 channels. Cx43 and Cx45 immunofluorescence signals were not detectable at this interface, probably because of markedly reduced gap junction size. Macroscopic propagation velocity, measured by multisite high-resolution optical mapping of transmembrane potential in strands of cells of mixed Cx43 genotype, decreased with an increasing proportion of Cx43KO cells in the strand. A marked decrease in conduction velocity was observed in strands composed of <50% WT cells. Propagation at the microscopic scale showed a high degree of dissociation between WT(GFP) and Cx43KO cells, but consistent excitation without development of propagation block. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneous ablation of Cx43 leads to a marked decrease in propagation velocity in tissue strands composed of <50% cells with WT Cx43 expression and marked dissociation of excitation at the cellular level. However, the small residual electric conductance between Cx43 and WT(GFP) myocytes assures excitation of Cx43(-/-) cells. This explains the previously reported undisturbed contractility in tissues with spatially heterogeneous downregulation of Cx43 expression.
RATIONALE: Spatial heterogeneity in connexin (Cx) expression has been implicated in arrhythmogenesis. OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to quantify the relation between the degree of heterogeneity in Cx43 expression and disturbances in electric propagation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cell pairs and strands composed of mixtures of Cx43(-/-) (Cx43KO) or GFP-expressing Cx43(+/+) (WT(GFP)) murineventricular myocytes were patterned using microlithographic techniques. At the interface between pairs of WT(GFP) and Cx43KO cells, dual-voltage clamp showed a marked decrease in electric coupling (approximately 5% of WT) and voltage gating suggested the presence of mixed Cx43/Cx45 channels. Cx43 and Cx45 immunofluorescence signals were not detectable at this interface, probably because of markedly reduced gap junction size. Macroscopic propagation velocity, measured by multisite high-resolution optical mapping of transmembrane potential in strands of cells of mixed Cx43 genotype, decreased with an increasing proportion of Cx43KO cells in the strand. A marked decrease in conduction velocity was observed in strands composed of <50% WT cells. Propagation at the microscopic scale showed a high degree of dissociation between WT(GFP) and Cx43KO cells, but consistent excitation without development of propagation block. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneous ablation of Cx43 leads to a marked decrease in propagation velocity in tissue strands composed of <50% cells with WT Cx43 expression and marked dissociation of excitation at the cellular level. However, the small residual electric conductance between Cx43 and WT(GFP) myocytes assures excitation of Cx43(-/-) cells. This explains the previously reported undisturbed contractility in tissues with spatially heterogeneous downregulation of Cx43 expression.
Authors: Feliksas F Bukauskas; Maria M Kreuzberg; Mindaugas Rackauskas; Angele Bukauskiene; Michael V L Bennett; Vytas K Verselis; Klaus Willecke Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-06-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: John A Jansen; Maartje Noorman; Hassan Musa; Mèra Stein; Sanne de Jong; Roel van der Nagel; Thomas J Hund; Peter J Mohler; Marc A Vos; Toon A van Veen; Jacques M de Bakker; Mario Delmar; Harold V van Rijen Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2011-11-16 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Stephan B Danik; Gregg Rosner; Joshua Lader; David E Gutstein; Glenn I Fishman; Gregory E Morley Journal: FASEB J Date: 2007-11-05 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Ana Paula Piantanida; Luis Ernesto Acosta; Lucila Brocardo; Claudia Capurro; Charles A Greer; Lorena Rela Journal: J Comp Neurol Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 3.215
Authors: Yu Tan; Dylan Richards; Ruoyu Xu; Skylar Stewart-Clark; Santhosh Kumar Mani; Thomas Keith Borg; Donald R Menick; Bozhi Tian; Ying Mei Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2015-04-07 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Wassim A Basheer; Shaohua Xiao; Irina Epifantseva; Ying Fu; Andre G Kleber; TingTing Hong; Robin M Shaw Journal: Circ Res Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Stephen P Chelko; Angeliki Asimaki; Peter Andersen; Djahida Bedja; Nuria Amat-Alarcon; Deeptankar DeMazumder; Ravirasmi Jasti; Calum A MacRae; Remo Leber; Andre G Kleber; Jeffrey E Saffitz; Daniel P Judge Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2016-04-21
Authors: Max R Salick; Brett N Napiwocki; Jin Sha; Gavin T Knight; Shahzad A Chindhy; Timothy J Kamp; Randolph S Ashton; Wendy C Crone Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 12.479