PURPOSE: To identify which rest phase (systolic or diastolic) is optimum for assessing or measuring cardiac structures in the setting of three-dimensional (3D) whole-heart imaging in congenital heart disease (CHD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was obtained. Fifty children (26 male and 24 female patients) underwent 3D dual-phase whole-heart imaging. Cardiac structures were analyzed for contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and image quality. Cross-sectional measurements were taken of the aortic arch, right ventricular (RV) outflow tract (RVOT) and pulmonary arteries. Normally distributed variables were compared by using paired t tests, and categorical data were compared by using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Mean CNR and image quality were significantly (all P < .05) greater in systole for the right atrium (CNR, 8.9 vs 7.5; image quality, 438 vs 91), left atrium (CNR, 8.0 vs 5.3; image quality, 1006 vs 29), RV (CNR, 10.6 vs 8.2; image quality, 131 vs 23), LV (CNR, 9.4 vs 7.7; image quality, 125 vs 28), and pulmonary veins (CNR, 6.2 vs 4.9; image quality, 914 vs 32). Conversely, diastolic CNR was significantly higher in the aorta (9.2 vs 8.2; P = .013) and diastolic image quality was higher for the left pulmonary artery (238 vs 62; P = .007), right pulmonary artery (219 vs 35; P < .001), and for imaging of an area after an arterial stenosis (164 vs 7; P < .001). All aortic arch and RVOT cross-sectional measurements were significantly (P < .05) greater in systole (narrowest point of arch, 70 vs 53 mm(2); descending aorta, 71 vs 58 mm(2); transverse arch, 293 vs 275 mm(2); valvar RVOT, 291 vs 268 mm(2); supravalvar RVOT, 337 vs 280 mm(2); prebifurcation RVOT, 329 vs 259 mm(2)). CONCLUSION: Certain structures in CHD are better imaged in systole and others in diastole, and therefore, the dual-phase approach allows a higher overall success rate. This approach also allows depiction of diameter changes between systole and diastole and is therefore preferable to standard single-phase sequences for the planning of interventional procedures.
PURPOSE: To identify which rest phase (systolic or diastolic) is optimum for assessing or measuring cardiac structures in the setting of three-dimensional (3D) whole-heart imaging in congenital heart disease (CHD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was obtained. Fifty children (26 male and 24 female patients) underwent 3D dual-phase whole-heart imaging. Cardiac structures were analyzed for contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and image quality. Cross-sectional measurements were taken of the aortic arch, right ventricular (RV) outflow tract (RVOT) and pulmonary arteries. Normally distributed variables were compared by using paired t tests, and categorical data were compared by using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Mean CNR and image quality were significantly (all P < .05) greater in systole for the right atrium (CNR, 8.9 vs 7.5; image quality, 438 vs 91), left atrium (CNR, 8.0 vs 5.3; image quality, 1006 vs 29), RV (CNR, 10.6 vs 8.2; image quality, 131 vs 23), LV (CNR, 9.4 vs 7.7; image quality, 125 vs 28), and pulmonary veins (CNR, 6.2 vs 4.9; image quality, 914 vs 32). Conversely, diastolic CNR was significantly higher in the aorta (9.2 vs 8.2; P = .013) and diastolic image quality was higher for the left pulmonary artery (238 vs 62; P = .007), right pulmonary artery (219 vs 35; P < .001), and for imaging of an area after an arterial stenosis (164 vs 7; P < .001). All aortic arch and RVOT cross-sectional measurements were significantly (P < .05) greater in systole (narrowest point of arch, 70 vs 53 mm(2); descending aorta, 71 vs 58 mm(2); transverse arch, 293 vs 275 mm(2); valvar RVOT, 291 vs 268 mm(2); supravalvar RVOT, 337 vs 280 mm(2); prebifurcation RVOT, 329 vs 259 mm(2)). CONCLUSION: Certain structures in CHD are better imaged in systole and others in diastole, and therefore, the dual-phase approach allows a higher overall success rate. This approach also allows depiction of diameter changes between systole and diastole and is therefore preferable to standard single-phase sequences for the planning of interventional procedures.
Authors: Michael Groth; Peter Bannas; Marc Regier; Jan H Buhk; Kai Müllerleile; Gerhard Adam; Frank O Henes Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Moritz H Albrecht; Akos Varga-Szemes; U Joseph Schoepf; Georg Apfaltrer; Jiaqian Xu; Kwang-Nam Jin; Anthony M Hlavacek; Shahryar M Chowdhury; Pal Suranyi; Christian Tesche; Carlo N De Cecco; Davide Piccini; Matthias Stuber; Giulia Ginami; Thomas J Vogl; Arni Nutting Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-09-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Danielle M Moyé; Tarique Hussain; Rene M Botnar; Animesh Tandon; Gerald F Greil; Adrian K Dyer; Markus Henningsson Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2018-10-16 Impact factor: 1.930
Authors: Gorka Gómez-Ciriza; Tomás Gómez-Cía; José Antonio Rivas-González; Mari Nieves Velasco Forte; Israel Valverde Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2021-06-04
Authors: Tarique Hussain; Sujeev Mathur; Sarah A Peel; Israel Valverde; Karolina Bilska; Markus Henningsson; Rene M Botnar; John Simpson; Gerald F Greil Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 1.930