Literature DB >> 22517677

Forming interdisciplinary expertise: one organization's journey on the road to translational nanomedicine.

Sharon Tsai-hsuan Ku1.   

Abstract

This paper provides a sociological account of how researchers of different disciplines become experts in translational nanomedicine. Using a case study of the Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory (NCL) at the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the author argues that the relationship between the different disciplines involved in translational nanomedicine should be understood in the broader sociopolitical context of the boundary politics between the academy, industry, and government. This study suggests that the process of training the nanobio expert is not simply a process of inculcating skills; it is also a process of institution building. In the case of the NCL, sustaining the laboratory's existence at the interface between the university, industry, and government informed how researchers practiced interdisciplinarity and cultivated their interdisciplinary expertise. It required mobilizing institutional resources through administrative/managerial strategies. Viewing the formation of a professional identity as a social process helps clarify the meaning of interdisciplinarity and provides insight in evaluating the performance of interdisciplinary collaboration and the design of nanoscience education.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22517677      PMCID: PMC3380180          DOI: 10.1002/wnan.1172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol        ISSN: 1939-0041


  7 in total

1.  Medicine. The NIH Roadmap.

Authors:  Elias Zerhouni
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  "The tools of the discipline: biochemists and molecular biologists": a comment.

Authors:  R M Burian
Journal:  J Hist Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.326

3.  The proliferation of nano journals.

Authors:  Michael L Grieneisen
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 39.213

Review 4.  The new toxicology of sophisticated materials: nanotoxicology and beyond.

Authors:  Andrew D Maynard; David B Warheit; Martin A Philbert
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Research training and academic disciplines at the convergence of nanotechnology and biomedicine in the United States.

Authors:  Kelly Y Kim
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 6.  Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles.

Authors:  Günter Oberdörster; Eva Oberdörster; Jan Oberdörster
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Toxicology as a nanoscience?--disciplinary identities reconsidered.

Authors:  Monika Kurath; Sabine Maasen
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 9.400

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Essential components of a successful doctoral program in nanomedicine.

Authors:  Anne L van de Ven; Mary H Shann; Srinivas Sridhar
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-12-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.