Literature DB >> 22517632

Retrospective multicenter observational study of the interventional management of coronary disease in the very elderly: the NINETY.

Dario Sillano1, Chiara Resmini, Emanuele Meliga, Giacomo Boccuzzi, Andrea Zuffi, Emanuele Barbato, Julian Gunn, Matthew Price, Fiorenzo Gaita, Imad Sheiban.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this observational, multicenter study was to describe the outcome of very elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data among nonagenarians undergoing PCI.
METHODS: All consecutive patients 90 years of age or older undergoing PCI with stent implantation between April 2002 and June 2009 were included in the study. The primary endpoint was the long-term rate of net adverse cardiac events (NACE), that is, death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization, and life-threatening or major bleedings.
RESULTS: One hundred forty-six nonagenarians were divided in three groups according to clinical setting: 27 (group A) stable angina or silent ischemia, 85 (group B) unstable angina or non-ST elevation MI, and 34 (group C) with ST elevation MI (STEMI). At 30 days, the incidence of NACE was significantly lower in patients in Group A vs. B or C (0% vs. 17.3% vs. 31.2%, P = 0.006), and the frequency of definite stent thrombosis was higher in Group C vs. A or B (9.4% vs. 0% vs. 0%, P = 0.007), respectively. Up to a median follow-up of 24 months, NACE rate was 33.3% in group A, 49.3% in group B, and 50% in group C (P = 0.32). There were no significant differences between groups in the individual components of the primary endpoint.
CONCLUSIONS: PCI in nonagenarians is safe and feasible with acceptable major bleeding rates. However, long-term results show high mortality rates particularly in the STEMI group.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; angina; myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention; unstable

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22517632     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.24406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  5 in total

1.  Barthel Index as a Predictor of 1-Year Mortality in Very Elderly Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: Better Activities of Daily Living, Longer Life.

Authors:  Satoshi Higuchi; Yusuke Kabeya; Kenichi Matsushita; Hiroki Taguchi; Haruhisa Ishiguro; Hideyasu Kohshoh; Hideaki Yoshino
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 2.  What's Age Got to do with it? A Review of Contemporary Revascularization in the Elderly.

Authors:  Sebastian Vandermolen; Jane Abbott; Kalpa De Silva
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2015

3.  Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients ≥ 75 years: one-center study in a Chinese patient group.

Authors:  Peng-Fei Chen; Dan-Ning Wang; Kan Chen; Chun Liang; Yu-Sheng Reng; Jing Yang; Ru Ding; Jacob Blackwell; De-Ning Liao
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.327

4.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in nonagenarians: pros and cons.

Authors:  Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai; Antonio Abbate; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Davide Presutti; Mariangela Peruzzi; Elena Cavarretta; Antonino G M Marullo; Marzia Lotrionte; Giacomo Frati
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.327

5.  Should Percutaneous Coronary Intervention be the Standard Treatment Strategy for Significant Coronary Artery Disease in all Octogenarians?

Authors:  George Kassimis; Grigoris V Karamasis; Athanasios Katsikis; Joanna Abramik; Nestoras Kontogiannis; Matthaios Didagelos; Dimitrios Petroglou; Christodoulos E Papadopoulos; Leonidas Poulimenos; Vassilios Vassilikos; Ioannis Kanonidis; Tushar Raina; Antonios Ziakas
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2021
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.