Literature DB >> 22516907

No differences in O2-cost between V1 and V2 skating techniques during treadmill roller skiing at moderate to steep inclines.

Thomas Losnegard1, Håvard Myklebust, Jostein Hallén.   

Abstract

Elite crosscountry skiers use both the V1 and V2 techniques on moderate and steep inclines despite previous studies suggesting that the V1 technique is superior in terms of lower O2-cost and better performance on these inclines. However, this has not been studied in elite athletes, and therefore, the aim of this study was to compare O2-cost in these 2 main ski skating techniques in a group of 14 elite male crosscountry skiers (age: 24 ± 3 years, height: 184 ± 6 cm, weight: 79 ± 7 kg, V1 V[Combining Dot Above]O2max: 71.8 ± 3.5 ml·kg·min). With both techniques, the athletes performed submaximal trials for the determination of O2-cost on a roller ski treadmill at 4, 5, and 6° (3 m·s) and maximal trials at 8° (≥3 m·s) for the determination of V[Combining Dot Above]O2max. Video-based kinematic analyses on cycle length and cycle rate (CR) were performed to unravel if there was any relation between these variables and O2-cost. No significant differences in O2-cost or V[Combining Dot Above]O2max between techniques were found. However, large and significant individual variations in physiological response were observed. V2 had a longer cycle length and lower CR than V1 did. No significant correlation was found between CR and O2-cost. This study shows that both V1 and V2 are appropriate techniques for optimizing O2-cost on moderate to steep inclines in elite skiers. However, individual variation suggests that ski skating performance on moderate to steep inclines may be determined by technique preferences of the athletes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22516907     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318231a69e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  6 in total

1.  Anthropometrical and Physiological Determinants of Laboratory and on-Snow Performance in Competitive Adolescent Cross-Country Skiers.

Authors:  Ove Sollie; Thomas Losnegard
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 2.  Energy system contribution during competitive cross-country skiing.

Authors:  Thomas Losnegard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Kinematic differences between uphill roller skiing and on-snow skiing using the V2 skating technique.

Authors:  Håvard Myklebust; Thomas Losnegard; Jostein Hallén
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  The Dynamics of the Anaerobic Energy Contribution During a Simulated Mass-Start Competition While Roller-Ski Skating on a Treadmill.

Authors:  Dionne A Noordhof; Marius Lyng Danielsson; Knut Skovereng; Jørgen Danielsen; Trine M Seeberg; Pål Haugnes; Jan Kocbach; Gertjan Ettema; Øyvind B Sandbakk
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2021-07-08

5.  Exercise economy in skiing and running.

Authors:  Thomas Losnegard; Daniela Schäfer; Jostein Hallén
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Exercise Intensity During Cross-Country Skiing Described by Oxygen Demands in Flat and Uphill Terrain.

Authors:  Øyvind Karlsson; Matthias Gilgien; Øyvind N Gløersen; Bjarne Rud; Thomas Losnegard
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.