Literature DB >> 22516669

The Bayesian brain: phantom percepts resolve sensory uncertainty.

Dirk De Ridder1, Sven Vanneste2, Walter Freeman3.   

Abstract

Phantom perceptions arise almost universally in people who sustain sensory deafferentation, and in multiple sensory domains. The question arises 'why' the brain creates these false percepts in the absence of an external stimulus? The model proposed answers this question by stating that our brain works in a Bayesian way, and that its main function is to reduce environmental uncertainty, based on the free-energy principle, which has been proposed as a universal principle governing adaptive brain function and structure. The Bayesian brain can be conceptualized as a probability machine that constantly makes predictions about the world and then updates them based on what it receives from the senses. The free-energy principle states that the brain must minimize its Shannonian free-energy, i.e. must reduce by the process of perception its uncertainty (its prediction errors) about its environment. As completely predictable stimuli do not reduce uncertainty, they are not worthwhile of conscious processing. Unpredictable things on the other hand are not to be ignored, because it is crucial to experience them to update our understanding of the environment. Deafferentation leads to topographically restricted prediction errors based on temporal or spatial incongruity. This leads to an increase in topographically restricted uncertainty, which should be adaptively addressed by plastic repair mechanisms in the respective sensory cortex or via (para)hippocampal involvement. Neuroanatomically, filling in as a compensation for missing information also activates the anterior cingulate and insula, areas also involved in salience, stress and essential for stimulus detection. Associated with sensory cortex hyperactivity and decreased inhibition or map plasticity this will result in the perception of the false information created by the deafferented sensory areas, as a way to reduce increased topographically restricted uncertainty associated with the deafferentation. In conclusion, the Bayesian updating of knowledge via active sensory exploration of the environment, driven by the Shannonian free-energy principle, provides an explanation for the generation of phantom percepts, as a way to reduce uncertainty, to make sense of the world.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayes; Cingulate; Free energy; Information; Insula; Neuropathic; Pain; Tinnitus; Uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22516669     DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  51 in total

1.  Deep brain stimulation of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule for treatment-resistant depression: possibilities, limits and future perspectives.

Authors:  Dirk De Ridder; Sven Vanneste; Berthold Langguth
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-04

Review 2.  Auditory thalamic circuits and GABAA receptor function: Putative mechanisms in tinnitus pathology.

Authors:  Donald M Caspary; Daniel A Llano
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  The differential effect of low- versus high-frequency random noise stimulation in the treatment of tinnitus.

Authors:  Kathleen Joos; Dirk De Ridder; Sven Vanneste
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Frontostriatal network dysfunction as a domain-general mechanism underlying phantom perception.

Authors:  Jeffrey Hullfish; Ian Abenes; Hye Bin Yoo; Dirk De Ridder; Sven Vanneste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Comparing immediate transient tinnitus suppression using tACS and tDCS: a placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Sven Vanneste; Vincent Walsh; Paul Van De Heyning; Dirk De Ridder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Frontostriatal Gating of Tinnitus and Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Josef P Rauschecker; Elisabeth S May; Audrey Maudoux; Markus Ploner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Dopamine-Induced Dysconnectivity Between Salience Network and Auditory Cortex in Subjects With Psychotic-like Experiences: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study.

Authors:  Julian Rössler; Wulf Rössler; Erich Seifritz; Lui Unterrassner; Thomas Wyss; Helene Haker; Diana Wotruba
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 9.306

8.  Top-down and Bottom-up Regulated Auditory Phantom Perception.

Authors:  Sven Vanneste; Ola Alsalman; Dirk De Ridder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Behavioral Outcomes and Neural Network Modeling of a Novel, Putative, Recategorization Sound Therapy.

Authors:  Mithila Durai; Zohreh Doborjeh; Philip J Sanders; Dunja Vajsakovic; Anne Wendt; Grant D Searchfield
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-04-27

10.  The balance between Bayesian inference and default mode determines the generation of tinnitus from decreased auditory input: A volume entropy-based study.

Authors:  Jae-Jin Song; Jaemin Park; Ja-Won Koo; Sang-Yeon Lee; Sven Vanneste; Dirk De Ridder; Soonki Hong; Seonhee Lim
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.