Literature DB >> 22516482

Reaching the healthy people goals for reducing childhood obesity: closing the energy gap.

Y Claire Wang1, C Tracy Orleans, Steven L Gortmaker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The federal government has set measurable goals for reducing childhood obesity to 5% by 2010 (Healthy People 2010), and 10% lower than 2005-2008 levels by 2020 (Healthy People 2020). However, population-level estimates of the changes in daily energy balance needed to reach these goals are lacking.
PURPOSE: To estimate needed per capita reductions in youths' daily "energy gap" (calories consumed over calories expended) to achieve Healthy People goals by 2020.
METHODS: Analyses were conducted in 2010 to fit multivariate models using National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 1971-2008 (N=46,164) to extrapolate past trends in obesity prevalence, weight, and BMI among youth aged 2-19 years. Differences in average daily energy requirements between the extrapolated 2020 levels and Healthy People scenarios were estimated.
RESULTS: During 1971-2008, mean BMI and weight among U.S. youth increased by 0.55 kg/m(2) and by 1.54 kg per decade, respectively. Extrapolating from these trends to 2020, the average weight among youth in 2020 would increase by ∼1.8 kg from 2007-2008 levels. Averting this increase will require an average reduction of 41 kcal/day in youth's daily energy gap. An additional reduction of 120 kcal/day and 23 kcal/day would be needed to reach Healthy People 2010 and Healthy People 2020 goals, respectively. Larger reductions are needed among adolescents and racial/ethnic minority youth.
CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive efforts are needed to reverse the positive energy imbalance underlying the childhood obesity epidemic. The energy-gap metric provides a useful tool for goal setting, intervention planning, and charting progress.
Copyright © 2012 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22516482     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  51 in total

1.  The home physical activity environment and adolescent BMI, physical activity and TV viewing: Disparities across a diverse sample.

Authors:  Marla E Eisenberg; Nicole I Larson; Jerica M Berge; Chelsey Thul; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2014-12-01

2.  Healthy Living Behaviors Among Chinese-American Preschool-Aged Children: Results of a Parent Survey.

Authors:  Virginia Rall Chomitz; Alison Brown; Victoria Lee; Aviva Must; Kenneth Kwan Ho Chui
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2018-08

3.  Cost-Effectiveness of a Clinical Childhood Obesity Intervention.

Authors:  Mona Sharifi; Calvin Franz; Christine M Horan; Catherine M Giles; Michael W Long; Zachary J Ward; Stephen C Resch; Richard Marshall; Steven L Gortmaker; Elsie M Taveras
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Factors associated with active commuting among a nationally representative sample of Canadian youth.

Authors:  Ammar Bookwala; Tara Elton-Marshall; Scott T Leatherdale
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2014-07-31

5.  The potential and reality of physical education in controlling overweight and obesity.

Authors:  David Kahan; Thomas L McKenzie
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Perspective: Childhood Obesity Requires New Strategies for Prevention.

Authors:  Barbara J Deal; Mark D Huffman; Helen Binns; Neil J Stone
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 8.701

7.  Utilizing a Board Game to Measure Family/Parenting Factors and Childhood Obesity Risk.

Authors:  Jerica M Berge; Susan Telke; Allan Tate; Amanda Trofholz
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.045

8.  Examining unanswered questions about the home environment and childhood obesity disparities using an incremental, mixed-methods, longitudinal study design: The Family Matters study.

Authors:  Jerica M Berge; Amanda Trofholz; Allan D Tate; Maureen Beebe; Angela Fertig; Michael H Miner; Scott Crow; Kathleen A Culhane-Pera; Shannon Pergament; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Delay discounting and household food purchasing decisions: The SHoPPER study.

Authors:  Bradley M Appelhans; Christy C Tangney; Simone A French; Melissa M Crane; Yamin Wang
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.267

10.  Leveraging delay discounting for health: Can time delays influence food choice?

Authors:  Bradley M Appelhans; Simone A French; Tamara Olinger; Michael Bogucki; Imke Janssen; Elizabeth F Avery-Mamer; Lisa M Powell
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.