PURPOSE: To describe the use of radiosurgery (RS) alone to the resection cavity after resection of brain metastases as an alternative to adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty-two patients with 64 cavities were treated with linear accelerator-based RS alone to the resection cavity after surgical removal of brain metastases between March 2007 and August 2010. Fifty-two patients (81%) had a gross total resection. Median cavity volume was 8.5 cm(3). Forty-four patients (71%) had a single metastasis. Median marginal and maximum doses were 18 Gy and 20.4 Gy, respectively. Sixty-one cavities (95%) had gross tumor volume to planning target volume expansion of ≥1 mm. RESULTS: Six-month and 1-year actuarial local recurrence rates were 14% and 22%, respectively, with a median follow-up period of 9.7 months. Six-month and 1-year actuarial distant brain recurrence, total intracranial recurrence, and freedom from WBRT rates were 31% and 51%, 41% and 63%, and 91% and 74%, respectively. The symptomatic cavity radiation necrosis rate was 8%, with 2 patients (3%) undergoing surgery. Of the 11 local failures, 8 were in-field, 1 was marginal, and 2 were both (defined as in-field if ≥90% of recurrence within the prescription isodose and marginal if ≥90% outside of the prescription isodose). CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of in-field cavity failure suggests that geographic misses with highly conformal RS are not a major contributor to local recurrence. The current dosing regimen derived from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 90-05 should be optimized in this patient population before any direct comparison with WBRT.
PURPOSE: To describe the use of radiosurgery (RS) alone to the resection cavity after resection of brain metastases as an alternative to adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty-two patients with 64 cavities were treated with linear accelerator-based RS alone to the resection cavity after surgical removal of brain metastases between March 2007 and August 2010. Fifty-two patients (81%) had a gross total resection. Median cavity volume was 8.5 cm(3). Forty-four patients (71%) had a single metastasis. Median marginal and maximum doses were 18 Gy and 20.4 Gy, respectively. Sixty-one cavities (95%) had gross tumor volume to planning target volume expansion of ≥1 mm. RESULTS: Six-month and 1-year actuarial local recurrence rates were 14% and 22%, respectively, with a median follow-up period of 9.7 months. Six-month and 1-year actuarial distant brain recurrence, total intracranial recurrence, and freedom from WBRT rates were 31% and 51%, 41% and 63%, and 91% and 74%, respectively. The symptomatic cavity radiation necrosis rate was 8%, with 2 patients (3%) undergoing surgery. Of the 11 local failures, 8 were in-field, 1 was marginal, and 2 were both (defined as in-field if ≥90% of recurrence within the prescription isodose and marginal if ≥90% outside of the prescription isodose). CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of in-field cavity failure suggests that geographic misses with highly conformal RS are not a major contributor to local recurrence. The current dosing regimen derived from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 90-05 should be optimized in this patient population before any direct comparison with WBRT.
Authors: Ahmad Walid Ayas; Stefan Grau; Karolina Jablonska; Daniel Ruess; Maximilian Ruge; Simone Marnitz; Roland Goldbrunner; Martin Kocher Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2018-09-14 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Anthony L Asher; Mohammed Ali Alvi; Mohamad Bydon; Nader Pouratian; Ronald E Warnick; James McInerney; Inga S Grills; Jason Sheehan Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Bree R Eaton; Michael J LaRiviere; Michael J La Riviere; Sungjin Kim; Roshan S Prabhu; Kirtesh Patel; Shravan Kandula; Nelson Oyesiku; Jeffrey Olson; Walter Curran; Hui-Kuo Shu; Ian Crocker Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2015-04-11 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Jim Zhong; Matthew J Ferris; Jeffrey Switchenko; Robert H Press; Zachary Buchwald; Jeffrey J Olson; Bree R Eaton; Walter J Curran; Hui-Kuo G Shu; Ian R Crocker; Kirtesh R Patel Journal: Pract Radiat Oncol Date: 2017-04-26
Authors: Kamran A Ahmed; Jessica M Freilich; Yazan Abuodeh; Nicholas Figura; Neha Patel; Siriporn Sarangkasiri; Prakash Chinnaiyan; Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu; Arnold B Etame; Nikhil G Rao Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-03-07 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Mudit Chowdhary; Derick Okwan-Duodu; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Robert H Press; Jaymin Jhaveri; Zachary S Buchwald; Jim Zhong; Bhavana V Chapman; Ranjit S Bindra; Joseph N Contessa; Henry S Park; James B Yu; Roy H Decker; Jeffrey J Olson; Nelson M Oyesiku; Ross A Abrams; Hui-Kuo G Shu; Walter J Curran; Ian R Crocker; Kirtesh R Patel Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Kirtesh R Patel; Roshan S Prabhu; Shravan Kandula; Daniel E Oliver; Sungjin Kim; Constantinos Hadjipanayis; Jeffery J Olson; Nelson Oyesiku; Walter J Curran; Mohammad K Khan; Hui-Kuo Shu; Ian Crocker Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-09-05 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Roshan S Prabhu; Anees Dhabaan; William A Hall; Tomi Ogunleye; Ian Crocker; Walter J Curran; Hui-Kuo G Shu Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 4.130