Literature DB >> 22516368

Modulation of somatosensory evoked magnetic fields by intensity of interfering stimuli in human somatosensory cortex: an MEG study.

Manyoel Lim1, June Sic Kim, Chun Kee Chung.   

Abstract

Somatosensory evoked responses are known to be modulated by previous interfering stimuli. Here, we first investigated the modulatory effects of interfering stimuli with different intensities on somatosensory evoked magnetic field in human primary (S1) and secondary (S2) somatosensory cortices. In the control condition of the study, test stimulus, set to strong intensity, was delivered to the left median nerve. Interfering stimuli with three different levels of intensity from weak (WI) through moderate (MI) and finally to strong (SI) were interspersed to the left median nerve between the test stimuli in each interfering condition. The cortical responses to the test stimulus were modeled with equivalent current dipoles in the contralateral S1 and bilateral S2 cortices from 17 subjects. The amplitude of the N20m deflection from the S1 was not changed by any interfering stimuli, whereas the amplitude of later P35m deflection was reduced by MI stimulus. The amplitude of P60m deflection was reduced by MI and SI stimuli. The extent of amplitude reduction of the bilateral S2 response was markedly increased as intensity of interfering stimuli increased from weak to moderate, but further reduction by the SI stimuli compared to MI stimuli was not observed. Those results indicated that somatosensory cortical activation in the S1 (P35m and P60m) and S2 were modulated by intensity of interfering stimuli. Our findings of a greater gating effect on the bilateral S2 compared to the contralateral S1 indicate that S2 may play an important role in temporal integration of different intensity levels of somatosensory inputs.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22516368     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  6 in total

1.  Variability and Reliability of Paired-Pulse Depression and Cortical Oscillation Induced by Median Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Hideaki Onishi; Naofumi Otsuru; Sho Kojima; Shota Miyaguchi; Kei Saito; Yasuto Inukai; Koya Yamashiro; Daisuke Sato; Hiroyuki Tamaki; Hiroshi Shirozu; Shigeki Kameyama
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Approach to impaired corollary discharge in patients with schizophrenia: An analysis of self-induced somatosensory evoked potentials and fields.

Authors:  Kazuyori Yagyu; Atsuhito Toyomaki; Naoki Hashimoto; Hideaki Shiraishi; Ichiro Kusumi; Harumitsu Murohashi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-17

3.  Low test-retest reliability of a protocol for assessing somatosensory cortex excitability generated from sensory nerves of the lower back.

Authors:  Katja Ehrenbrusthoff; Cormac G Ryan; Denis J Martin; Volker Milnik; Hubert R Dinse; Christian Grüneberg
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.473

4.  Sensory gating, inhibition control and gamma oscillations in the human somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Chia-Hsiung Cheng; Pei-Ying S Chan; David M Niddam; Shang-Yueh Tsai; Shih-Chieh Hsu; Chia-Yih Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Augmented Pain Processing in Primary and Secondary Somatosensory Cortex in Fibromyalgia: A Magnetoencephalography Study Using Intra-Epidermal Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Manyoel Lim; Meyke Roosink; June Sic Kim; Hye Won Kim; Eun Bong Lee; Kyeong Min Son; Hyun Ah Kim; Chun Kee Chung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Movement-Related Sensorimotor High-Gamma Activity Mainly Represents Somatosensory Feedback.

Authors:  Seokyun Ryun; June S Kim; Eunjeong Jeon; Chun K Chung
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.