Literature DB >> 22516185

The course of the sinus node artery and its impact on achieving linear block at the left atrial roof in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

Miki Yokokawa1, Baskaran Sundaram, Hakan Oral, Fred Morady, Aman Chugh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Linear block at the left atrial (LA) roof may be challenging in some patients undergoing an ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation.
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that may influence the likelihood of achieving roof block.
METHODS: Seventy-four patients (61 ± 10 years; 59 men [80%); LA diameter, 46 ± 6 mm; ejection fraction 0.55 ± 0.10) underwent linear ablation at the LA roof for persistent atrial fibrillation. The morphology of the roof and its anatomical relationship to adjacent structures were analyzed on a preprocedure computed tomography scan.
RESULTS: Complete block along the LA roof was achieved in 61 of the 74 patients (82%). There was no significant difference in the myocardial thickness, length, or other morphological aspects of the LA roof between patients with and without complete block. The sinus node artery (SNA) originated from the right coronary artery in 52 patients (70%) and the left circumflex artery in 22 patients (30%). The prevalence of a left SNA (from the circumflex) among patients with and without linear block at the roof was 21% and 69%, respectively (P = .001). On multivariate analysis, a left SNA was the only independent predictor of incomplete conduction block at the LA roof (odds ratio 6.8; 95% confidence interval 1.7-28; P = .007).
CONCLUSIONS: A left SNA identifies patients in whom conduction block at the roof is more difficult to achieve. A left SNA may act as an epicardial heat sink, preventing adequate heating of the LA roof during linear ablation.
Copyright © 2012 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22516185     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  6 in total

1.  Reversible sinus node injury during circumferential pulmonary vein ablation.

Authors:  Christian Sohns; Wieland Staab; Mark O'Neill; Dirk Vollmann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  Predictors of Recurrence After Radiofrequency Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Miki Yokokawa; Hakan Oral; Aman Chugh
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2012-10-06

3.  Sinus Node Dysfunction after Successful Atrial Flutter Ablation during Follow-Up: Clinical Characteristics and Predictors.

Authors:  Guan-Yi Li; Fa-Po Chung; Tze-Fan Chao; Yenn-Jiang Lin; Shih-Lin Chang; Li-Wei Lo; Yu-Feng Hu; Ta-Chuan Tuan; Jo-Nan Liao; Ting-Yung Chang; Ling Kuo; Cheng-I Wu; Chih-Min Liu; Shin-Huei Liu; Wen-Han Cheng; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Anatomical Variations in the Sinoatrial Nodal Artery: A Meta-Analysis and Clinical Considerations.

Authors:  Jens Vikse; Brandon Michael Henry; Joyeeta Roy; Piravin Kumar Ramakrishnan; Wan Chin Hsieh; Jerzy A Walocha; Krzysztof A Tomaszewski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Single ring isolation for atrial fibrillation ablation: How to do it and avoid the esophagus.

Authors:  Rajiv Mahajan; Anand Thiyagarajah; Dennis H Lau; Prashanthan Sanders
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2020-04-15

6.  Structural and Functional Properties of Subsidiary Atrial Pacemakers in a Goat Model of Sinus Node Disease.

Authors:  Luca Soattin; Zoltan Borbas; Jane Caldwell; Brian Prendergast; Akbar Vohra; Yawer Saeed; Andreas Hoschtitzky; Joseph Yanni; Andrew Atkinson; Sunil Jit Logantha; Balint Borbas; Clifford Garratt; Gwilym Matthew Morris; Halina Dobrzynski
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.