Literature DB >> 22516131

Chelating agents exert distinct effects on biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus depending on strain background: role for clumping factor B.

Nabil M Abraham1, Supaporn Lamlertthon2,3, Vance G Fowler3, Kimberly K Jefferson1.   

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of catheter infections, and biofilm formation plays a key role in the pathogenesis. Metal ion chelators inhibit bacterial biofilm formation and viability, making them attractive candidates as components in catheter lock solutions. The goal of this study was to characterize further the effect of chelators on biofilm formation. The effect of the calcium chelators ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid (EGTA) and trisodium citrate (TSC) on biofilm formation by 30 S. aureus strains was tested. The response to subinhibitory doses of EGTA and TSC varied dramatically depending on strain variation. In some strains, the chelators prevented biofilm formation, in others they had no effect, and they actually enhanced biofilm formation in others. The molecular basis for this phenotypic variability was investigated using two related strains: Newman, in which biofilm formation was inhibited by chelators, and 10833, which formed strong biofilms in the presence of chelators. It was found that deletion of the gene encoding the surface adhesin clumping factor B (clfB) completely eliminated chelator-induced biofilm formation in strain 10833. The role of ClfB in biofilm formation activity in chelators was confirmed in additional strains. It was concluded that biofilm-forming ability varies strikingly depending on strain background, and that ClfB is involved in biofilm formation in the presence EGTA and citrate. These results suggest that subinhibitory doses of chelating agents in catheter lock solutions may actually augment biofilm formation in certain strains of S. aureus, and emphasize the importance of using these agents appropriately so that inhibitory doses are achieved consistently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22516131      PMCID: PMC3542134          DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.040758-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  27 in total

1.  Catheter lock solutions influence staphylococcal biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces.

Authors:  Robert M Q Shanks; Jennifer L Sargent; Raquel M Martinez; Martha L Graber; George A O'Toole
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 5.992

2.  Calcium-induced virulence factors associated with the extracellular matrix of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  S Sarkisova; M A Patrauchan; D Berglund; D E Nivens; M J Franklin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Nature of the determinant of tetracycline resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  S S Kasatiya; J N Baldwin
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.

Authors:  Naomi P O'Grady; Mary Alexander; Lillian A Burns; E Patchen Dellinger; Jeffrey Garland; Stephen O Heard; Pamela A Lipsett; Henry Masur; Leonard A Mermel; Michele L Pearson; Issam I Raad; Adrienne G Randolph; Mark E Rupp; Sanjay Saint
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.918

5.  Tetrasodium EDTA as a novel central venous catheter lock solution against biofilm.

Authors:  Steven L Percival; Peter Kite; Kerrie Eastwood; Ricardo Murga; Janice Carr; Matthew J Arduino; Rodney M Donlan
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices.

Authors:  G D Christensen; W A Simpson; J J Younger; L M Baddour; F F Barrett; D M Melton; E H Beachey
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparative opsonic and protective activities of Staphylococcus aureus conjugate vaccines containing native or deacetylated Staphylococcal Poly-N-acetyl-beta-(1-6)-glucosamine.

Authors:  Tomás Maira-Litrán; Andrea Kropec; Donald A Goldmann; Gerald B Pier
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  New vector for efficient allelic replacement in naturally nontransformable, low-GC-content, gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  Maryvonne Arnaud; Arnaud Chastanet; Michel Débarbouillé
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Genetic evidence for an alternative citrate-dependent biofilm formation pathway in Staphylococcus aureus that is dependent on fibronectin binding proteins and the GraRS two-component regulatory system.

Authors:  Robert M Q Shanks; Michael A Meehl; Kimberly M Brothers; Raquel M Martinez; Niles P Donegan; Martha L Graber; Ambrose L Cheung; George A O'Toole
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  The role of Staphylococcus aureus surface protein SasG in adherence and biofilm formation.

Authors:  Rebecca M Corrigan; David Rigby; Pauline Handley; Timothy J Foster
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.777

View more
  12 in total

1.  Staphylococcus aureus clumping factor B mediates biofilm formation in the absence of calcium.

Authors:  Nabil M Abraham; Kimberly K Jefferson
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 2.777

2.  SdrC induces staphylococcal biofilm formation through a homophilic interaction.

Authors:  E Magda Barbu; Chris Mackenzie; Timothy J Foster; Magnus Höök
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 3.  Microbial biofilm: formation, architecture, antibiotic resistance, and control strategies.

Authors:  Muzamil Ahmad Rather; Kuldeep Gupta; Manabendra Mandal
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 4.  Prevention and treatment of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.

Authors:  Mohini Bhattacharya; Daniel J Wozniak; Paul Stoodley; Luanne Hall-Stoodley
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  SaeRS-dependent inhibition of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus Newman.

Authors:  David Cue; Jennifer M Junecko; Mei G Lei; Jon S Blevins; Mark S Smeltzer; Chia Y Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Novel strategies for the prevention and treatment of biofilm related infections.

Authors:  Meng Chen; Qingsong Yu; Hongmin Sun
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Effect of ciprofloxacin in the ultrastructure and development of biofilms formed by rapidly growing mycobacteria.

Authors:  María-Carmen Muñoz-Egea; María García-Pedrazuela; Ignacio Mahillo; Jaime Esteban
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.605

8.  Adherence of staphylococcus aureus to catheter tubing inhibition by quaternary ammonium compounds.

Authors:  Jean-Marie Liesse Iyamba; Daniel Tassa Okombe; Francis Nsimba Zakanda; Trésor Kimbeni Malongo; Joseph Welo Unya; Cyprien Mbundu Lukukula; Ntondo Za Balega Takaisi Kikuni
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2016-09-29

Review 9.  Current therapies in treatment and prevention of fracture wound biofilms: why a multifaceted approach is essential for resolving persistent infections.

Authors:  Krystle A Blanchette; Joseph C Wenke
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2018-04-12

Review 10.  Control of Biofilm Formation in Healthcare: Recent Advances Exploiting Quorum-Sensing Interference Strategies and Multidrug Efflux Pump Inhibitors.

Authors:  Bindu Subhadra; Dong Ho Kim; Kyungho Woo; Surya Surendran; Chul Hee Choi
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.