OBJECTIVES: We examined whether the widespread assumption that Hispanics are subject to greater noncoverage bias in landline telephone surveys because they are more likely than other ethnic groups to use cell phones exclusively was supported by data. METHODS: Data came from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey and the 2009 California Health Interview Survey. We considered estimates derived from surveys of adults with landline telephones biased and compared them with findings for all adults. Noncoverage bias was the difference between them, examined separately for Hispanics and non-Hispanic Whites. RESULTS: Differences in demographic and health characteristics between cell-only and landline users were larger for non-Hispanic Whites than Hispanics; cell usage was much higher for Hispanics than non-Hispanic Whites. The existence, pattern, and magnitude of noncoverage bias were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence to support a larger noncoverage bias for Hispanics than non-Hispanic Whites in landline telephone surveys. This finding should be considered in the design and interpretation of telephone surveys.
OBJECTIVES: We examined whether the widespread assumption that Hispanics are subject to greater noncoverage bias in landline telephone surveys because they are more likely than other ethnic groups to use cell phones exclusively was supported by data. METHODS: Data came from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey and the 2009 California Health Interview Survey. We considered estimates derived from surveys of adults with landline telephones biased and compared them with findings for all adults. Noncoverage bias was the difference between them, examined separately for Hispanics and non-Hispanic Whites. RESULTS: Differences in demographic and health characteristics between cell-only and landline users were larger for non-Hispanic Whites than Hispanics; cell usage was much higher for Hispanics than non-Hispanic Whites. The existence, pattern, and magnitude of noncoverage bias were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence to support a larger noncoverage bias for Hispanics than non-Hispanic Whites in landline telephone surveys. This finding should be considered in the design and interpretation of telephone surveys.
Authors: Stephen J Blumberg; Julian V Luke; Nadarajasundaram Ganesh; Michael E Davern; Michel H Boudreaux Journal: Natl Health Stat Report Date: 2012-10-12
Authors: Allison Kempe; Sean T O'Leary; Jo Ann Shoup; Shannon Stokley; Steven Lockhart; Anna Furniss; L Miriam Dickinson; Juliana Barnard; Matthew F Daley Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Melissa S Stockwell; Carolyn Westhoff; Elyse Olshen Kharbanda; Celibell Y Vargas; Stewin Camargo; David K Vawdrey; Paula M Castaño Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Arthur L Greil; Kathleen S Slauson-Blevins; Stacy Tiemeyer; Julia McQuillan; Karina M Shreffler Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Jayajit Chakraborty; Timothy W Collins; Sara E Grineski; Alejandra Maldonado Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Javier Díez-Domingo; Esther Redondo Margüello; Raúl Ortiz de Lejarazu Leonardo; Ángel Gil de Miguel; José María Guillén Ortega; Jesús Rincón Mora; Federico Martinón-Torres Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-04-25 Impact factor: 4.135