Literature DB >> 22515246

Transmission electron microscopic analysis showing structural changes to bacterial cells treated with electrolyzed water and an acidic sanitizer.

Lizanel Feliciano1, Jaesung Lee, Melvin A Pascall.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The effects of various sanitizers on the viability and cellular injury to structures of Escherichia coli and Listeria innocua were investigated. A food grade organic acidic formulation (pH 2.5) and acidic, neutral, and basic electrolyzed water [AEW (pH 2.7, oxidation reduction potential; ORP: 1100 mV, free available chlorine; FAC: 150 ppm), NEW (pH 6.9, ORP: 840 mV, FAC: 150 ppm), BEW (pH 11.6, ORP: -810 mV)] were used to treat E. coli and L. innocua cells. After 10 min of exposure to the sanitizers, changes to the bacterial numbers and cell structures were evaluated by plate counting and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), respectively. It was concluded from the results that the sanitizers reduced the E. coli cells between 2 and 3 log CFU/mL. Except for the BEW treatment, reductions in L. innocua population were greater (>1 log CFU/mL) than that of E. coli for all treatments. Data from the TEM showed that all sanitizers caused changes to the cell envelope and cytoplasm of both organisms. However, smaller changes were observed for L. innocua cells. Decrease in the integrity of the cell envelope and aggregation of the cytoplasmic components appeared to be mainly because of exposure to the sanitizers. The organic acid formulation and AEW were the most effective sanitizers against bacterial cells, indicating that penetration of acidic substances effectively caused the cell inactivation. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: An understanding of the method in which E-water and an acidic sanitizer cause injury to E. coli and L. innocua would be helpful in selecting an effective chemical agent as a food safety tool. This will allow a scientist to target similar microorganisms such as food borne bacteria with structures that are vulnerable to the sanitizer.
© 2012 Institute of Food Technologists®

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22515246     DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02633.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Sci        ISSN: 0022-1147            Impact factor:   3.167


  5 in total

1.  Presence of hydrogen peroxide, a source of hydroxyl radicals, in acid electrolyzed water.

Authors:  Takayuki Mokudai; Keisuke Nakamura; Taro Kanno; Yoshimi Niwano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Inhibition of Cronobacter sakazakii by Lactobacillus acidophilus n.v. Er2 317/402.

Authors:  Haykuhi Charchoghlyan; Heejun Kwon; Dong-Ju Hwang; Jong Suk Lee; Junsoo Lee; Myunghee Kim
Journal:  Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Removal of Foodborne Pathogen Biofilms by Acidic Electrolyzed Water.

Authors:  Qiao Han; Xueying Song; Zhaohuan Zhang; Jiaojiao Fu; Xu Wang; Pradeep K Malakar; Haiquan Liu; Yingjie Pan; Yong Zhao
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Antiseptic Effects and Biosafety of a Controlled-Flow Electrolyzed Acid Solution Involve Electrochemical Properties, Rather than Free Radical Presence.

Authors:  Alejandro Cabrera-Wrooman; Silvestre Ortega-Peña; Rosa M Salgado; Belinda Sandoval-Cuevas; Edgar Krötzsch
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-03-30

5.  Application of Neutral Electrolyzed Water on pork chops and its impact on meat quality.

Authors:  Erwin Torres-Rosales; Andres Rivera-Garcia; Patricia Janet Rosario-Perez; Juan Carlos Ramirez-Orejel; David Paez-Esquiliano; Sandra Martinez-Vidal; Eduardo Guzman-Olea; Jose Alberto Cano-Buendia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.