| Literature DB >> 22514722 |
Anders Pape Møller1, Andrea Bonisoli-Alquati, Geir Rudolfsen, Timothy A Mousseau.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Radiation has negative effects on survival of animals including humans, although the generality of this claim is poorly documented under low-dose field conditions. Because females may suffer disproportionately from the effects of radiation on survival due to differences in sex roles during reproduction, radiation-induced mortality may result in male-skewed adult sex ratios. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDING: We estimated the effects of low-dose radiation on adult survival rates in birds by determining age ratios of adults captured in mist nets during the breeding season in relation to background radiation levels around Chernobyl and in nearby uncontaminated control areas. Age ratios were skewed towards yearlings, especially in the most contaminated areas, implying that adult survival rates were reduced in contaminated areas, and that populations in such areas could only be maintained through immigration from nearby uncontaminated areas. Differential mortality in females resulted in a strongly male-skewed sex ratio in the most contaminated areas. In addition, males sang disproportionately commonly in the most contaminated areas where the sex ratio was male skewed presumably because males had difficulty finding and acquiring mates when females were rare. The results were not caused by permanent emigration by females from the most contaminated areas because none of the recaptured birds had changed breeding site, and the proportion of individuals with morphological abnormalities did not differ significantly between the sexes for areas with normal and higher levels of contamination.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22514722 PMCID: PMC3324427 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035223
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Background radiation in the Chernobyl region and location of study sites. Adapted from European Union [.
Age ratio (% yearlings), sample size and difference between adult survival rate and adult survival rate estimate based on age ratio (100 - % yearlings) for areas with normal (< 0.05 µSv/h) and higher levels of background radiation ((≥ 0.05 µSv/h) during 2010–2011.
| Species | Age ratio normal radiation | N | Age ratio higher radiation | N | Adult survival rate | Difference in survival rate at normal radiation | Difference in survival rate at higher radiation |
|
| 0.00 | 2 | 100.00 | 1 | 43.0 | –57.00 | 43.00 |
|
| 80.00 | 5 | 66.67 | 6 | 53.0 | 33.00 | 19.67 |
|
| 36.36 | 22 | 74.00 | 50 | 38.0 | –25.64 | 12.00 |
|
| 100.00 | 1 | 100.00 | 4 | 49.9 | 49.90 | 49.90 |
|
| 25.00 | 32 | 40.30 | 67 | 64.0 | –11.00 | 4.30 |
|
| 65.93 | 226 | 37.50 | 36 | 37.0 | 2.93 | –25.50 |
|
| 0.00 | 1 | 37.50 | 24 | 48.5 | –51.50 | –14.00 |
|
| 0.00 | 1 | 70.58 | 17 | 52.0 | –48.00 | 22.58 |
|
| 50.00 | 8 | 80.00 | 5 | 41.6 | –8.40 | 21.60 |
|
| 30.00 | 20 | 65.85 | 41 | 48.6 | –21.40 | 14.45 |
|
| 60.00 | 5 | 100.00 | 5 | 55.0 | 15.00 | 55.00 |
|
| 50.00 | 4 | 66.67 | 15 | 55.3 | 5.30 | 21.97 |
|
| 52.63 | 19 | 68.42 | 19 | 46.0 | –1.37 | 14.42 |
|
| 50.00 | 2 | 100.00 | 1 | 37.0 | –13.00 | 37.00 |
|
| 47.06 | 17 | 69.84 | 63 | 56.0 | 3.06 | 25.84 |
|
| 46.15 | 19 | 90.91 | 22 | 46.0 | –7.85 | 36.91 |
| Mean | 43.32 | 73.02 | 48.18 | –8.50 | 21.20 | ||
| SE | 7.01 | 5.42 | 1.92 | 7.20 | 5.34 | ||
|
| –1.18 | 3.97 | |||||
|
| 0.26 | 0.003 |
Northern Ukraine has low levels of background radiation around 0.01–0.05 µSv/h in areas that are unaffected by contamination from Chernobyl [25]. The null expectation for difference in survival rate is zero, while the predicted difference is expected to be zero for normal background radiation, but a significantly lower difference survival rate at higher levels of background radiation.
Figure 2Observed age ratio (proportion of all birds that were yearlings) of birds captured in mist nets in relation to level of background radiation (µSv/h) during 2010–2011. Error bars represent standard errors.
Figure 3Observed adult tertiary sex ratio (proportion of all adult birds that were males) of birds captured in mist nets in relation to level of background radiation (µSv/h) during 2010–2011. Error bars represent standard errors.
Figure 4Observed proportion of individual birds singing of all birds recorded during point count breeding bird surveys in relation to level of background radiation (µSv/h) during 2006–2009. Error bars represent standard errors.