Literature DB >> 22514449

A cost-benefit analysis of prenatal screening for toxoplasmosis.

V S Sahai1, H Onyett.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine critically the validity of a toxoplasma prenatal screening program, in the context of a cost-benefit analysis, as it relates to the Canadian experience. Recently, studies have suggested that early treatment of infected infants with a combination of pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine is effective in reducing the sequelae of toxoplasmosis. It was concluded that a carefully planned screening program for detecting and treating infants infected with Toxoplasma gondii during pregnancy is cost beneficial. The cost of delivering a screening and treatment program is less than half of what it would cost to provide comprehensive long term medical, educational and other social services for the estimated 1000 children born each year with congenital toxoplasmosis. Even if an incidence as low as two infected infants per 1000 pregnancies is assumed and only 400 children were affected, the screening and preventive therapy program would be justified.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost-benefit analysis; Prenatal screening; Toxoplasma gondii; Toxoplasmosis

Year:  1996        PMID: 22514449      PMCID: PMC3327413          DOI: 10.1155/1996/678145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Infect Dis        ISSN: 1180-2332


  13 in total

1.  The periodic health examination. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1979-11-03       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Toxoplasmosis needs evaluation. An overview and proposals.

Authors:  M Koskiniemi; M Lappalainen; K Hedman
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1989-06

3.  Prenatal diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis.

Authors:  G Desmonts; F Daffos; F Forestier; M Capella-Pavlovsky; P Thulliez; M Chartier
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-03-02       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Results of 20-year follow-up of congenital toxoplasmosis.

Authors:  J G Koppe; D H Loewer-Sieger; H de Roever-Bonnet
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-01       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Toxoplasmosis in the perinatal period.

Authors:  H Williams
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Early and longitudinal evaluations of treated infants and children and untreated historical patients with congenital toxoplasmosis: the Chicago Collaborative Treatment Trial.

Authors:  J McAuley; K M Boyer; D Patel; M Mets; C Swisher; N Roizen; C Wolters; L Stein; M Stein; W Schey
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Development of adverse sequelae in children born with subclinical congenital Toxoplasma infection.

Authors:  C B Wilson; J S Remington; S Stagno; D W Reynolds
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 8.  Current recommendations and future prospects in the treatment of toxoplasmosis.

Authors:  R E McCabe; S Oster
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  What is known about the prevention of congenital toxoplasmosis?

Authors:  D Jeannel; D Costagliola; G Niel; B Hubert; M Danis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-08-11       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Neurologic and developmental outcome in treated congenital toxoplasmosis.

Authors:  N Roizen; C N Swisher; M A Stein; J Hopkins; K M Boyer; E Holfels; M B Mets; L Stein; D Patel; P Meier
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.