| Literature DB >> 22514211 |
Haiyan Tong1, Ana G Rappold, David Diaz-Sanchez, Susan E Steck, Jon Berntsen, Wayne E Cascio, Robert B Devlin, James M Samet.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Air pollution exposure has been associated with adverse cardiovascular health effects. Findings of a recent epidemiological study suggested that omega-3 fatty acid (fish oil) supplementation blunted cardiac responses to air pollution exposure.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22514211 PMCID: PMC3404661 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1104472
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Figure 1Schematic representation of the study design.
Characteristics of the study participants before supplementation.
| Characteristic | FO (n = 16) | OO (n = 13) | p-Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (male/female) | 4/12 | 4/9 | ||||
| Age (years) | 57.4 ± 1.4 | 59.3 ± 1.1 | 0.32 | |||
| Race (white/black) | 10/6 | 11/2 | ||||
| BMI (m2/kg) | 27.6 ± 1.1 | 26.3 ± 1.3 | 0.44 | |||
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 122 ± 3 | 123 ± 3 | 0.92 | |||
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 77 ± 2 | 77 ± 2 | 0.95 | |||
| Heart rate (bpm) | 74 ± 2 | 71 ± 3 | 0.47 | |||
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | ||||||
| Total | 201 ± 12 | 214 ± 7 | 0.41 | |||
| LDL | 117 ± 10 | 125 ± 9 | 0.57 | |||
| VLDL | 19 ± 2 | 19 ± 3 | 0.87 | |||
| HDL | 64 ± 4 | 70 ± 6 | 0.46 | |||
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 97 ± 10 | 94 ± 14 | 0.88 | |||
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 88 ± 3 | 93 ± 2 | 0.17 | |||
| WBC (× 103/µL) | 5.53 ± 0.25 | 5.46 ± 0.39 | 0.88 | |||
| RBC (× 106/µL) | 4.45 ± 0.12 | 4.76 ± 0.17 | 0.14 | |||
| Platelets (× 103/µL) | 245.9 ± 13.6 | 223.3 ± 12.2 | 0.25 | |||
| Neutrophils (%) | 55.9 ± 2.9 | 55.3 ± 2.7 | 0.88 | |||
| Lymphocytes (%) | 34.9 ± 2.9 | 34.6 ± 2.5 | 0.94 | |||
| Smoking history (no. of participants) | ||||||
| Nonsmokers | 11 | 11 | ||||
| Ex-smokers | 5 | 2 | ||||
| Current smokers | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Medications (no. of participants) | ||||||
| Statin | 1 | 2 | ||||
| β-adrenergic receptor blockers | 0 | 0 | ||||
| ACE inhibitors | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Antidepressants | 2 | 1 | ||||
| NSAIDs | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Abbreviations: ACE, angiotensin converting enzyme; BMI, body mass index; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; NSAID, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug; RBC, red blood cells; VLDL, very low-density lipoprotein; WBC, white blood cells. Data are presented as n or mean ± SE. Two-sample t-test was used to compare the difference between the FO and OO groups. | ||||||
Percent of total plasma fatty acids after 4 weeks of supplementation with fish oil or olive oil.
| Fatty acid | FO (n = 16) | OO (n = 13) | p-Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C16:0 palmitic acid | 29.78 ± 0.52 | 30.19 ± 0.57 | 0.59 | |||
| C18:1 oleic acid | 15.63 ± 0.66 | 17.44 ± 0.61 | 0.06 | |||
| C18:2 linoleic acid (LA) | 20.82 ± 0.91 | 20.71 ± 0.55 | 0.92 | |||
| C18:3 linolenic acid (ALA) | 0.56 ± 0.05 | 0.41 ± 0.02 | 0.03 | |||
| C20:4 arachidonic acid (AA) | 7.40 ± 0.46 | 9.07 ± 0.44 | 0.02 | |||
| C20:5 eicosapentaenoic acid | 3.38 ± 0.33 | 0.52 ± 0.04 | < 0.001 | |||
| C22:5 docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) | 1.07 ± 0.09 | 0.48 ± 0.04 | < 0.001 | |||
| C22:6 docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) | 1.88 ± 0.16 | 1.65 ± 0.14 | 0.51 | |||
| Data are presented as mean ± SE. Two-sample t-test was used to compare the difference between the FO and OO groups. Nonabundant fatty acids that did not differ between the two groups are not shown. | ||||||
Figure 2Effect of CAP exposure on frequency domain indices of HRV. nLF HRV and HF/LF ratio were analyzed in the ECG recordings of participants at rest before, immediately after exposure to filtered air and CAP (Post), and again the next morning (Follow-up) as described in “Methods.“ Data shown are average changes per 100-µg/m3 increase in CAP relative to the filtered air and 95% confidence intervals.
Percent change from the filtered air exposure for individual end points per 100 µg/m3 of CAP.
| FO (n = 16) | OO (n = 13) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| End points | Post-CAP | Follow-up | Post-CAP | Follow-up | ||||
| HRV | ||||||||
| nLF | –2.62 ± 1.85 | –0.74 ± 2.02 | 7.41 ± 2.38* | 5.47 ± 2.60* | ||||
| HF/LF | 3.67 ± 2.42 | 1.89 ± 2.77 | –7.87 ± 3.12* | –2.97 ± 3.58 | ||||
| QT | ||||||||
| QTc | 0.05 ± 0.11 | 0.08 ± 0.20 | 0.12 ± 0.15 | 0.58 ± 0.26* | ||||
| QTp | 0.22 ± 0.33 | 0.23 ± 0.43 | 0.44 ± 0.42 | 1.70 ± 0.55* | ||||
| Tp-Te | 0.65 ± 0.34 | 1.17 ± 0.48* | –0.48 ± 0.44 | 1.13 ± 0.62 | ||||
| Tp-Te/QT | 0.32 ± 0.43 | 0.72 ± 0.46 | –0.66 ± 0.56 | –0.44 ± 0.59 | ||||
| Lipids | ||||||||
| VLDL | 1.54 ± 1.95 | –5.22 ± 2.97 | 7.68 ± 2.55* | 6.33 ± 3.82 | ||||
| LDL | –0.30 ± 0.81 | 1.08 ± 0.89 | 0.54 ± 1.05 | –1.40 ± 1.15 | ||||
| HDL | –0.19 ± 0.72 | 0.59 ± 0.68 | –0.46 ± 0.93 | –1.10 ± 0.87 | ||||
| Triglycerides | 1.27 ± 1.93 | –5.32 ± 2.96 | 7.40 ± 2.52* | 6.00 ± 3.81 | ||||
| Total cholesterol | 0.13 ± 0.50 | 0.45 ± 0.61 | 1.10 ± 0.65 | –0.57 ± 0.79 | ||||
| Blood cells | ||||||||
| WBC | 0.01 ± 1.04 | 2.81 ± 1.42 | 0.06 ± 1.36 | –2.06 ± 1.83 | ||||
| RBC | –0.35 ± 0.38 | 0.21 ± 0.43 | –0.12 ± 0.49 | –0.75 ± 0.55 | ||||
| Platelets | 0.26 ± 0.48 | 0.59 ± 0.69 | –0.41 ± 0.62 | –0.30 ± 0.88 | ||||
| Neutrophils | –0.47 ± 0.91 | –0.02 ± 1.17 | –1.10 ± 1.18 | –3.05 ± 1.50* | ||||
| Lymphocytes | 0.35 ± 1.42 | –0.83 ± 2.39 | 1.27 ± 1.85 | 4.47 ± 3.08 | ||||
| Monocytes | –0.94 ± 3.12 | 1.02 ± 1.99 | 0.60 ± 4.02 | 3.13 ± 2.56 | ||||
| Parameter estimates are summarized as mean ± SE. *p < 0.05, compared to filtered air. | ||||||||
Figure 3Effect of CAP exposure on indices of cardiac repolarization. QTc, QTp, and Tp-Te were analyzed in ECG recordings of participants at rest before, immediately after exposure to filtered air and CAP (Post), and again the next morning (Follow-up) as described in “Methods.“ Data shown are average changes per 100-µg/m3 increase in CAP relative to the filtered air and 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 4Effect of CAP exposure on plasma lipid levels and blood percent of neutrophils. Blood percent of neutrophils, plasma triglycerides and VLDL were measured before, immediately after exposure to filtered air and CAP (Post), and again the next morning (Follow-up) as described in “Methods.“ Data shown are average changes per 100-µg/m3 increase in CAP relative to the filtered air and 95% confidence intervals.