Literature DB >> 22513436

Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colectomy.

Stefan W Leichtle1, Nicolas J Mouawad, Kathleen B Welch, Richard M Lampman, Robert K Cleary.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage is a morbid and potentially fatal complication of colorectal surgery. Determination of pre- and intraoperative risk factors may identify patients requiring increased postoperative surveillance for this major complication.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage after colectomy with primary intra-abdominal anastomosis.
DESIGN: The prospective, statewide multicenter Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative database was analyzed.
SETTING: This study was performed at academic and community medical centers in the state of Michigan. PATIENTS: Included were all cases of open and laparoscopic colectomy with primary intra-abdominal anastomosis from 2007 through 2010. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Univariate analysis followed by a multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the influence of patient factors and operative events with respect to the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage.
RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 4340 cases. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 85 (3.2%) of the 2626 (60.5%) open colectomies, and in 51 (3.0%) of the 1714 (39.5%) laparoscopic procedures, which was not significantly different (p = 0.63). Significant risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage based on the multivariate logistic regression model were fecal contamination with OR 2.51, 95% CI, 1.16 to 5.45, p = 0.02; and intraoperative blood loss of more than 100 mL and 300 mL, with OR 1.62, 95% CI, 1.10 to 2.40, p = 0.02; and OR 2.22, 95% CI, 1.32 to 3.76, p = 0.003. LIMITATIONS: The Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative colectomy project excluded high-risk rectal resections and low pelvic anastomoses. Information about operative technique and intraoperative events is limited, and anastomotic leakage was determined through chart review.
CONCLUSION: Fecal contamination and increased blood loss during colectomy should raise suspicion for potential postoperative anastomotic leakage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22513436     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182423c0d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  27 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors and predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: reappraisal of the literature.

Authors:  Fumihiko Fujita; Yasuhiro Torashima; Tamotsu Kuroki; Susumu Eguchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  The prevention of colorectal anastomotic leakage with tissue adhesives in a contaminated environment is associated with the presence of anti-inflammatory macrophages.

Authors:  Zhouqiao Wu; Konstantinos A Vakalopoulos; Geesien S A Boersema; Leonard F Kroese; King H Lam; Paul H van der Horst; Irene M Mulder; Yvonne M Bastiaansen-Jenniskens; Gert-Jan Kleinrensink; Johannes Jeekel; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with double stapling technique anastomosis.

Authors:  Kenji Kawada; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Postoperative Complications: Looking Forward to a Safer Future.

Authors:  Sarah E Tevis; Gregory D Kennedy
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

5.  Duodenal stump fistula after gastric surgery for malignancies: a retrospective analysis of risk factors in a single centre experience.

Authors:  Elena Orsenigo; Massimiliano Bissolati; Carlo Socci; Damiano Chiari; Francesca Muffatti; Jacopo Nifosi; Carlo Staudacher
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Ileostomy reversal with handsewn techniques. Short-term outcomes in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Gaetano Luglio; Francesco Terracciano; Mariano Cesare Giglio; Michele Sacco; Roberto Peltrini; Viviana Sollazzo; Emanuela Spadarella; Cristina Bucci; Giovanni Domenico De Palma; Luigi Bucci
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  The perioperative surgical home (PSH): a comprehensive review of US and non-US studies shows predominantly positive quality and cost outcomes.

Authors:  Bita A Kash; Yichen Zhang; Kayla M Cline; Terri Menser; Thomas R Miller
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.911

8.  Prophylactic transanal decompression tube versus non-prophylactic transanal decompression tube for anastomotic leakage prevention in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yun Yang; Ye Shu; Fangyu Su; Lin Xia; Baofeng Duan; Xiaoting Wu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Standardization of surgical procedures to reduce risk of anastomotic leakage, reoperation, and surgical site infection in colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study of 1189 patients.

Authors:  Ken Eto; Mitsuyoshi Urashima; Makoto Kosuge; Masahisa Ohkuma; Rota Noaki; Kai Neki; Daisuke Ito; Yasuhiro Takeda; Hiroshi Sugano; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Evaluation of the LigaSure(™) Vessel Sealing System for bowel transection and intestinal anastomosis-an experimental study in a porcine model.

Authors:  Tobias Gehrig; A T Billeter; A L Wekerle; M Shevchenko; K Brand; B P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.