Literature DB >> 22513227

Glycerol as a substrate for aerobic succinate production in minimal medium with Corynebacterium glutamicum.

Boris Litsanov1, Melanie Brocker, Michael Bott.   

Abstract

Corynebacterium glutamicum, an established microbial cell factory for the biotechnological production of amino acids, was recently genetically engineered for aerobic succinate production from glucose in minimal medium. In this work, the corresponding strains were transformed with plasmid pVWEx1-glpFKD coding for glycerol utilization genes from Escherichia coli. This plasmid had previously been shown to allow growth of C. glutamicum with glycerol as sole carbon source. The resulting strains were tested in minimal medium for aerobic succinate production from glycerol, which is a by-product in biodiesel synthesis. The best strain BL-1/pVWEx1-glpFKD formed 79 mM (9.3 g l(-1)) succinate from 375 mM glycerol, representing 42% of the maximal theoretical yield under aerobic conditions. A specific succinate production rate of 1.55 mmol g(-1) (cdw) h(-1) and a volumetric productivity of 3.59 mM h(-1) were obtained, the latter value representing the highest one currently described in literature. The results demonstrate that metabolically engineered strains of C. glutamicum are well suited for aerobic succinate production from glycerol.
© 2012 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology © 2012 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22513227      PMCID: PMC3917461          DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2012.00347.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Biotechnol        ISSN: 1751-7915            Impact factor:   5.813


Introduction

Glycerol is a main by-product of biodiesel and bioethanol production (Yazdani and Gonzalez, 2007). By utilizing glycerol for the production of value-added chemicals, such as 1,3-propanediol, ethanol, amino acids or succinate, the economic efficiency of these biofuel production processes can be significantly increased (Wendisch et al., 2011). Succinate is a C4-dicarboxylate offering interesting prospects for the chemical industry as feedstock for the production of a large variety of important bulk chemicals, such as tetrahydrofurane (THF), 1,4-butanediol, γ-butyrolactone or maleic anhydride, with a total annual production of more than 500 000 tons (Zeikus et al., 1999; McKinlay et al., 2007). Bio-based succinate production from glycerol has been described for a number of natural succinate producers, such as Basfia succiniciproducens (Scholten and Dagele, 2008) and Anaerobiospirillum succiniciproducens (Lee et al., 2001), as well as for metabolically engineered Escherichia coli strains (Blankschien et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2010). The described processes are anaerobic ones (with exception of one microaerobic process) and allow a maximal succinate yield of 1 mol succinate mol−1 glycerol, whereas aerobic processes can maximally yield 0.5 mol mol−1. The slow anaerobic growth with glycerol, attributed to a redox imbalance resulting from the use of intermediates for biosynthesis (Zhang et al., 2010), and the low energy yield during anaerobic utilization of glycerol (Gonzalez et al., 2008) result in a low volumetric productivity (0.7–1.7 mM h−1) (Blankschien et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2010). This disadvantage of all described processes hinders their biotechnological implementation (Zhang et al., 2010). Alternatively, aerobic succinate production from glycerol with the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica was recently examined (Yuzbashev et al., 2010). It accumulated succinate with relatively high volumetric productivity (2.29 mM h−1) under optimal conditions (pH 7). However, complex media additives were necessary for growth and product formation which can complicate downstream processing and increase the production costs. Thus, none of the so far described succinate production processes from glycerol is perfectly suitable for industrial application. Corynebacterium glutamicum is a Gram-positive soil bacterium with GRAS status (generally regarded as safe). It is used industrially for the large-scale production of more than 2 million tons of l-glutamate and about 1.4 million tons of l-lysine annually (Ajinomoto Co., 2010; 2011,). In addition, C. glutamicum strains were designed for the production of many other industrially relevant products, such as l-serine (Stolz et al., 2007) and d-serine (Stäbler et al., 2011), l-valine (Blombach et al., 2008), 2-ketoisovalerate (Krause et al., 2010), putrescine (Schneider and Wendisch, 2010), isobutanol (Smith et al., 2010; Blombach et al., 2011), diaminopentane (Mimitsuka et al., 2007), d-lactate (Okino et al., 2008a) or ethanol (Inui et al., 2004). The genome of C. glutamicum is known (Ikeda and Nakagawa, 2003; Kalinowski et al., 20032003; Yukawa et al., 2007) and reliable tools for genetic engineering exist (Kirchner and Tauch, 2003). Moreover, extensive knowledge on the metabolism of C. glutamicum is available due to 60 years of research on amino acid production (Eggeling and Bott, 2005; Burkovski, 2008). Recently metabolically engineered C. glutamicum strains have been described which belong to the most efficient microorganisms for succinate production from glucose either under anaerobic (Okino et al., 2008b; Litsanov et al., 2012a) or aerobic conditions (Litsanov et al., 2012b). Under aerobic conditions C. glutamicum was able to synthesize succinate in minimal medium with a high specific productivity [1.6 mmol g (cdw)−1 h−1]. The strain C. glutamicumΔsdhCAB (Litsanov et al., 2012b) devoid of the operon coding for succinate dehydrogenase showed relatively high succinate production but also formed large amounts of acetate as a by-product. When the genes for all known metabolic routes for acetate synthesis were deleted in the ΔsdhCAB background, the resulting strain C. glutamicum BL-1 showed an 82% reduction in acetate accumulation and a 65% increase in succinate production. Further improvements were obtained by increasing C3 carboxylation and by using growth-decoupled conditions (Litsanov et al., 2012b). Naturally, C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 is not able to utilize glycerol as carbon source, but expression of the E. coli glpFKD operon allows the organism to grow on glycerol as sole carbon and energy source (Rittmann et al., 2008). Based on our previous study on aerobic succinate production from glucose we now explored the possibility of aerobic succinate production from glycerol with C. glutamicum (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Scheme of the central metabolism of C. glutamicum tailored for aerobic succinate production from glycerol. Enzymes whose genes were deleted are indicated by ‘X’. The reactions affected by these deletions and their products are displayed in grey. Enzymes whose genes were overexpressed are highlighted in grey boxes and the arrows for the corresponding reactions are thickened. Abbreviations: ACN, aconitase; AK, acetate kinase; CoAT, acetyl-CoA : CoA transferase; CS, citrate synthase; FUM, fumarase; GF, glycerol facilitator (from E. coli); GK, glycerol kinase (from E. coli); G-3-P DH, glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (from E. coli); ICD, isocitrate dehydrogenase; ICL, isocitrate lyase; MQO, malate : menaquinone oxidoreductase; MS, malate synthase; OAA, oxaloacetate; ODHC, 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; PK, pyruvate kinase; PEPCx, PEP carboxylase; PCx, pyruvate carboxylase; PDHC, pyruvate dehydrogenase complex; PTA, phosphotransacetylase; PQO, pyruvate : menaquinone oxidoreductase; SCS, succinyl-CoA synthetase; SDH, succinate dehydrogenase.

Scheme of the central metabolism of C. glutamicum tailored for aerobic succinate production from glycerol. Enzymes whose genes were deleted are indicated by ‘X’. The reactions affected by these deletions and their products are displayed in grey. Enzymes whose genes were overexpressed are highlighted in grey boxes and the arrows for the corresponding reactions are thickened. Abbreviations: ACN, aconitase; AK, acetate kinase; CoAT, acetyl-CoA : CoA transferase; CS, citrate synthase; FUM, fumarase; GF, glycerol facilitator (from E. coli); GK, glycerol kinase (from E. coli); G-3-P DH, glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (from E. coli); ICD, isocitrate dehydrogenase; ICL, isocitrate lyase; MQO, malate : menaquinone oxidoreductase; MS, malate synthase; OAA, oxaloacetate; ODHC, 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; PK, pyruvate kinase; PEPCx, PEP carboxylase; PCx, pyruvate carboxylase; PDHC, pyruvate dehydrogenase complex; PTA, phosphotransacetylase; PQO, pyruvate : menaquinone oxidoreductase; SCS, succinyl-CoA synthetase; SDH, succinate dehydrogenase.

Results and discussion

Utilization of glycerol for aerobic succinate production by C. glutamicum ΔsdhCAB/pVWEx1-glpFKD

We previously showed that the strains C. glutamicumΔsdhCAB and C. glutamicum BL-1 are capable of aerobic succinate production from glucose (Litsanov et al., 2012b). To give these strains the ability to use glycerol as carbon source, they were transformed with plasmid pVWEx1-glpFKD, coding for a glycerol facilitator, glycerol kinase and glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase from E. coli (Rittmann et al., 2008). The resulting strains were tested for aerobic succinate production from glycerol (Fig. 1). Three independent batch cultivations with each strain in glycerol minimal medium were performed in a parallel bioreactor system. Since elevated glycerol concentrations had been shown to inhibit growth (Rittmann et al., 2008), the experiments were performed with 400 mM glycerol as sole carbon source. With respect to carbon (1200 mM), this concentration was slightly lower than the one (1332 mM carbon) used previously for succinate production from glucose (222 mM), but in the same range to allow a comparison. To prevent acidification of the medium by the organic acid production, the pH was kept constant at 7.0 by addition of 3 M KOH. Oxygen limitation was avoided by keeping pO2 at > 30% saturation. During cultivation growth (OD600), glycerol consumption and organic acid production were measured and compared with data previously published for aerobic succinate production from glucose by the strains C. glutamicumΔsdhCAB and C. glutamicum BL-1 (Fig. 2, Table 1). Except for the carbon source, the cultivation conditions were the same as previously published (Litsanov et al., 2012b).
Figure 2

Biomass formation (A), substrate consumption (B), succinate production (C) and acetate production (D) of C. glutamicum ΔsdhCAB/pVWEx1-glpFKD (filled squares, n = 3) and C. glutamicum BL-1/pVWEx1-glpFKD (filled circles, n = 3) on glycerol and of C. glutamicum ΔsdhCAB (open squares, n = 4) and C. glutamicum BL-1 (open circles, n = 2) on glucose. The values for strains ΔsdhCAB and BL-1 on glucose were taken from Litsanov and colleagues (2012b) The experiments were performed as aerobic batch cultivations in modified CGXII medium containing 400 mM (1200 mM carbon) glycerol or 222 mM (1332 mM carbon) glucose under constantly controlled conditions of pH 7.0 and pO2 > 30% using a Multifors bioreactor system as described previously (Litsanov et al., 2012b). The results displayed are average data including standard deviation from at least three experiments except for C. glutamicum BL-1, where only mean values from two independent experiments are presented. Glucose and organic acids were quantified by HPLC as described previously. Glycerol was also analysed by HPLC and quantified by an Agilent 1100 Refractive Index Detector.

Table 1

Growth and organic acid production parameters of different C. glutamicum succinate producer strains during aerobic cultivation on 222 mM glucose or 400 mM glycerol as carbon source in modified CGXII medium using a Multifors bioreactor system at pH 7.0 and pO2 > 30% saturation.

SubstrateC. glutamicum strainGrowth rate (h−1)Biomass [g (cdw) l−1]Substrate consumed (mM carbon)aSubstrate uptake rate [mmol carbon g (cdw)−1 h−1]Final acetate titre (mM)Final succinate titre (mM)Succinate production rate [mmol g−1 (cdw) h−1]Yield succinate/substrate (mol mol−1)Succinate yield (%)b
GlucoseΔsdhCAB0.31 ± 0.0113.1 ± 0.51351 ± 2332 ± 1125 ± 1140 ± 30.75 ± 0.030.18 ± 0.0118 ± 1
BL-10.3313.013993122661.390.2829
GlycerolΔsdhCAB/pVWEx1-glpFKD0.19 ± 0.0010.0 ± 1.31107 ± 1023 ± 289 ± 664 ± 11.30 ± 0.050.17 ± 0.0035 ± 1
BL-1/pVWEx1-glpFKD0.22 ± 0.0210.1 ± 2.31125 ± 3525 ± 235 ± 279 ± 61.55 ± 0.230.21 ± 0.0242 ± 4

Glucose concentration multiplied by factor of 6, glycerol concentration multiplied by factor of 3.

Based on the maximal theoretical succinate yields from glucose (1 mol succinate mol−1 glucose) or glycerol (0.5 mol succinate mol−1 glycerol) calculated for non-growing cells metabolizing the substrate exclusively via glycolysis and the oxidative TCA cycle.

All parameters describing rates were calculated for the exponential growth phase of the cultures. The data are average values including standard deviation from at least three experiments except for C. glutamicum BL-1 where only mean values from two independent experiments are presented. The values for strains ΔsdhCAB and BL-1 on glucose were taken from Litsanov and colleagues (2012b).

Biomass formation (A), substrate consumption (B), succinate production (C) and acetate production (D) of C. glutamicum ΔsdhCAB/pVWEx1-glpFKD (filled squares, n = 3) and C. glutamicum BL-1/pVWEx1-glpFKD (filled circles, n = 3) on glycerol and of C. glutamicum ΔsdhCAB (open squares, n = 4) and C. glutamicum BL-1 (open circles, n = 2) on glucose. The values for strains ΔsdhCAB and BL-1 on glucose were taken from Litsanov and colleagues (2012b) The experiments were performed as aerobic batch cultivations in modified CGXII medium containing 400 mM (1200 mM carbon) glycerol or 222 mM (1332 mM carbon) glucose under constantly controlled conditions of pH 7.0 and pO2 > 30% using a Multifors bioreactor system as described previously (Litsanov et al., 2012b). The results displayed are average data including standard deviation from at least three experiments except for C. glutamicum BL-1, where only mean values from two independent experiments are presented. Glucose and organic acids were quantified by HPLC as described previously. Glycerol was also analysed by HPLC and quantified by an Agilent 1100 Refractive Index Detector. Growth and organic acid production parameters of different C. glutamicum succinate producer strains during aerobic cultivation on 222 mM glucose or 400 mM glycerol as carbon source in modified CGXII medium using a Multifors bioreactor system at pH 7.0 and pO2 > 30% saturation. Glucose concentration multiplied by factor of 6, glycerol concentration multiplied by factor of 3. Based on the maximal theoretical succinate yields from glucose (1 mol succinate mol−1 glucose) or glycerol (0.5 mol succinate mol−1 glycerol) calculated for non-growing cells metabolizing the substrate exclusively via glycolysis and the oxidative TCA cycle. All parameters describing rates were calculated for the exponential growth phase of the cultures. The data are average values including standard deviation from at least three experiments except for C. glutamicum BL-1 where only mean values from two independent experiments are presented. The values for strains ΔsdhCAB and BL-1 on glucose were taken from Litsanov and colleagues (2012b). Corynebacterium glutamicumΔsdhCAB/pVWEx1-glpFKD grew on glycerol with a growth rate of 0.19 h−1 and completely consumed glycerol (369 mM) within 22 h. The specific substrate uptake rate for glycerol [23 mmol carbon g (cdw)−1 h−1] was 28% lower than the specific glucose uptake rate of strain C. glutamicumΔsdhCAB[32 mmol carbon g (cdw)−1 h−1]. The different uptake mechanisms may play a role in this context. Whereas glucose is transported actively into the cell by a high-affinity phosphotransferase system (PTS) (Mori and Shiio, 1987), glycerol enters cells of C. glutamicum carrying pVWEx1-glpFKD via facilitated diffusion mediated by the glycerol facilitator GlpF (Rittmann et al., 2008). Remarkably, succinate production by strain C. glutamicumΔsdhCAB/pVWEx1-glpFKD on glycerol was significantly increased compared with that of strain C. glutamicumΔsdhCAB on glucose. A succinate titre of 64 mM (+60%) was reached with a succinate production rate of 1.3 mmol g (cdw)−1 h−1 (+73%). The final succinate yield (0.17 mol mol−1 glycerol) represented 35% of the maximal theoretical yield of 0.5 mol succinate mol−1 glycerol. The calculation of the maximal yield was based on resting cells which catabolized glycerol exclusively via glycolysis and the oxidative branch of the TCA cycle (Fig. 1). Corynebacterium glutamicumΔsdhCAB reached only 18% of the maximal theoretical succinate yield (1 mol mol−1 glucose) during growth on glucose (Litsanov et al., 2012b). This difference in the relative yields could at least partially be due to the fact that 29% less acetate was formed on glycerol (Table 1). These results suggest that the utilization of glycerol favours succinate production and lowers acetate production. Glycerol dissimilation is initiated by its ATP-dependent phosphorylation via glycerol kinase (Durnin et al., 2008; Rittmann et al., 2008). In contrast, glucose is phosphorylated by the glucose-specific PTS to glucose 6-phosphate with phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) as phosphoryl donor. High glucose uptake rates favour high pyruvate and low PEP concentrations in the cell, a situation which was shown to be unfavourable for aerobic and anaerobic succinate production by E. coli, because PEP is the subtrate for anaplerotic C3 carboxylation via phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPCx) or phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCk) (Lin et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2009). In contrast, pyruvate is the major precursor for by-product synthesis in the corresponding strains. Inactivation of the PTS system in the aerobic and anaerobic succinate producers of E. coli improved succinate production and decreased the accumulation of by-products (Lin et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2009). Corynebacterium glutamicum possesses two carboxylation enzymes, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (Mori and Shiio, 1985; Eikmanns et al., 1989) and pyruvate carboxylase (Peters-Wendisch et al., 1998). Although pyruvate carboxylase is the predominant carboxylation enzyme during aerobic growth of the wild type, PEP carboxylase also contributes to the anaplerotic flux (Petersen et al., 2000). In our previous study we showed that oxaloacetate formation by PEP carboxylase becomes more important during aerobic succinate production, since overexpression of the ppc gene led to an increased succinate yield (Litsanov et al., 2012b). Based on these observations an improved availability of PEP for PEP carboxylation and a reduced level of pyruvate might be responsible for the better succinate yield and reduced acetate formation from glycerol compared with glucose. Furthermore, the higher energy content of glycerol (ΔGf0 = −162.84 kJ mol−1 C) compared with glucose (ΔGf0 = −152.87 kJ mol−1 C) (Thauer et al., 1977) due to its higher reduction status and the resulting higher ATP yield might positively influence succinate formation. The conversion of glycerol to dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) yields reducing equivalents in the form of menaquinol which can drive ATP synthesis via oxidative phosphorylation (Bott and Niebisch, 2003). In contrast, conversion of glucose to DHAP via the Embden–Meyerhof pathway is not accompanied by formation of NADH or menaquinol.

Utilization of glycerol for aerobic succinate production by C. glutamicum BL-1/pVWEx1-glpFKD

Corynebacterium glutamicum BL-1/pVWEx1-glpFKD, a derivative of strain ΔsdhCAB which lacks all known genes for acetate formation (Litsanov et al., 2012b), grew on glycerol with a growth rate of 0.22 h−1 and completely consumed 375 mM glycerol within 22 h. Absence of the genes pqo, ackA, pta and cat coding for pyruvate : menaquinone oxidoreductase (PQO), acetate kinase (AK), phosphotransacetylase (PTA) and acetyl-CoA : CoA transferase (CoAT), respectively, reduced acetate formation during growth on glycerol by 61% compared with strain ΔsdhCAB/pVWEx1-glpFKD (Table 1). Remarkably, the final acetate concentration in strain BL-1/pVWEx1-glpFKD on glycerol was higher than that of strain BL-1 on glucose, a result which cannot be explained yet. Strain BL-1/pVWEx1-glpFKD achieved a 23% higher succinate titre (79 ± 6 mM), a 19% higher specific succinate productivity [1.55 mmol g (cdw)−1 h−1] and a 24% higher yield (0.21 mol mol−1) than strain ΔsdhCAB/pVWEx1-glpFKD. The production results of strain BL-1/pVWEx1-glpFKD on glycerol were comparable to that of strain BL-1/pAN6-pycP458Sppc, which represents the currently best strain of C. glutamicum for aerobic succinate production from glucose (Litsanov et al., 2012b). Plasmid pAN6-pycP458Sppc improves PEP/pyruvate carboxylation by combined overexpression of the genes for pyruvate carboxylase (with a P458S exchange) and PEP carboxylase. Strain BL-1/pVWEx1-glpFKD showed a volumetric succinate productivity of 3.59 mM h−1, which to our knowledge represents the highest value described in literature for aerobic succinate producers from glycerol. Additional improvements of this strain are possible by increasing anaplerotic C3 carboxylation and applying growth-limiting conditions, as shown before for aerobic succinate production from glucose (Litsanov et al., 2012b). Furthermore, the genomic integration of the E. coli glpFKD genes under control of a strong constitutive promoter such as the tuf promoter (Litsanov et al., 2012a) could have a positive effect by eliminating the requirements for plasmid maintenance and improving strain stability. For industrial application, the C. glutamicum strains have to be tested and if necessary improved with respect to their tolerance to raw glycerol, which often contains growth-inhibitory impurities (Moon et al., 2010). In summary, the present study describes for the first time the efficient use of glycerol as substrate for aerobic succinate production with metabolically engineered C. glutamicum. The described process shows two unique features: (i) the highest known volumetric productivity of all currently described microbial strains for aerobic succinate production from glycerol and (ii) the use of minimal medium. Taken together, these two advantages and the opportunities for strain and process optimization makes the current process an interesting alternative to anaerobic fermentations.

Conflict of interest

None declared.
  36 in total

1.  Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  R K Thauer; K Jungermann; K Decker
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1977-03

2.  Corynebacterium glutamicum tailored for efficient isobutanol production.

Authors:  Bastian Blombach; Tanja Riester; Stefan Wieschalka; Christian Ziert; Jung-Won Youn; Volker F Wendisch; Bernhard J Eikmanns
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for 2-ketoisovalerate production.

Authors:  Felix S Krause; Bastian Blombach; Bernhard J Eikmanns
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Succinic acid production with reduced by-product formation in the fermentation of Anaerobiospirillum succiniciproducens using glycerol as a carbon source.

Authors:  P C Lee; W G Lee; S Y Lee; H N Chang
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2001-01-05       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  In vivo quantification of parallel and bidirectional fluxes in the anaplerosis of Corynebacterium glutamicum.

Authors:  S Petersen; A A de Graaf; L Eggeling; M Möllney; W Wiechert; H Sahm
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-11-17       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  The complete Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 genome sequence and its impact on the production of L-aspartate-derived amino acids and vitamins.

Authors:  Jörn Kalinowski; Brigitte Bathe; Daniela Bartels; Nicole Bischoff; Michael Bott; Andreas Burkovski; Nicole Dusch; Lothar Eggeling; Bernhard J Eikmanns; Lars Gaigalat; Alexander Goesmann; Michael Hartmann; Klaus Huthmacher; Reinhard Krämer; Burkhard Linke; Alice C McHardy; Folker Meyer; Bettina Möckel; Walter Pfefferle; Alfred Pühler; Daniel A Rey; Christian Rückert; Oliver Rupp; Hermann Sahm; Volker F Wendisch; Iris Wiegräbe; Andreas Tauch
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 7.  Tools for genetic engineering in the amino acid-producing bacterium Corynebacterium glutamicum.

Authors:  Oliver Kirchner; Andreas Tauch
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 8.  The respiratory chain of Corynebacterium glutamicum.

Authors:  Michael Bott; Axel Niebisch
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 9.  The Corynebacterium glutamicum genome: features and impacts on biotechnological processes.

Authors:  M Ikeda; S Nakagawa
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Efficient aerobic succinate production from glucose in minimal medium with Corynebacterium glutamicum.

Authors:  Boris Litsanov; Armin Kabus; Melanie Brocker; Michael Bott
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 5.813

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in the metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for the production of lactate and succinate from renewable resources.

Authors:  Yota Tsuge; Tomohisa Hasunuma; Akihiko Kondo
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Complex regulation of the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase gene pck and characterization of its GntR-type regulator IolR as a repressor of myo-inositol utilization genes in Corynebacterium glutamicum.

Authors:  Simon Klaffl; Melanie Brocker; Jörn Kalinowski; Bernhard J Eikmanns; Michael Bott
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 3.  Engineered biosynthesis of biodegradable polymers.

Authors:  Pooja Jambunathan; Kechun Zhang
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 4.  Two-component signal transduction in Corynebacterium glutamicum and other corynebacteria: on the way towards stimuli and targets.

Authors:  Michael Bott; Melanie Brocker
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum aimed at alternative carbon sources and new products.

Authors:  Ahmed Zahoor; Steffen N Lindner; Volker F Wendisch
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 7.271

6.  Accelerated pentose utilization by Corynebacterium glutamicum for accelerated production of lysine, glutamate, ornithine and putrescine.

Authors:  Tobias M Meiswinkel; Vipin Gopinath; Steffen N Lindner; K Madhavan Nampoothiri; Volker F Wendisch
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 5.813

Review 7.  Toward glycerol biorefinery: metabolic engineering for the production of biofuels and chemicals from glycerol.

Authors:  Zhen Chen; Dehua Liu
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 6.040

8.  A new genome-scale metabolic model of Corynebacterium glutamicum and its application.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Jingyi Cai; Xiuling Shang; Bo Wang; Shuwen Liu; Xin Chai; Tianwei Tan; Yun Zhang; Tingyi Wen
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 9.  Bio-based production of organic acids with Corynebacterium glutamicum.

Authors:  Stefan Wieschalka; Bastian Blombach; Michael Bott; Bernhard J Eikmanns
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 5.813

10.  Metabolic engineering of Mortierella alpina for arachidonic acid production with glycerol as carbon source.

Authors:  Guangfei Hao; Haiqin Chen; Zhennan Gu; Hao Zhang; Wei Chen; Yong Q Chen
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 5.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.