Literature DB >> 22512513

Language and disadvantage: a comparison of the language abilities of adolescents from two different socioeconomic areas.

Sarah Spencer1, Judy Clegg, Joy Stackhouse.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is recognized that children from areas associated with socioeconomic disadvantage are at an increased risk of delayed language development. However, so far research has focused mainly on young children and there has been little investigation into language development in adolescence. AIMS: To investigate the language abilities of adolescents from two different socioeconomic areas. The paper aims to determine if a higher proportion of adolescents from an area of socioeconomic disadvantage have low language scores when compared with adolescents from a relatively advantaged area. METHODS & PROCEDURES: Six standardized language assessments were used to measure expressive and receptive language skills across vocabulary, syntax and narrative in two cohorts of 13 and 14 year olds: one cohort attending a school in an area of socioeconomic disadvantage (103 participants) and the other cohort attending a school in an area of relative socioeconomic advantage (48 participants). OUTCOMES &
RESULTS: The cohort from the area of disadvantage performed significantly lower than the assessments' normative mean on all measures of language ability. There were significant differences between the two cohorts on four of the six language measures. More adolescents from the school in the area of socioeconomic disadvantage had standardized assessment scores that suggest hitherto undetected language difficulties. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: Results suggest that socioeconomic background is associated with language ability in adolescence as measured by standardized tests. In particular, adolescents from an area of socioeconomic disadvantage were at risk of low vocabulary scores. The advantages and disadvantages of using standardized language assessments are discussed and the implications for clinical and educational practice and for school level policies are highlighted.
© 2012 Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22512513     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00104.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord        ISSN: 1368-2822            Impact factor:   3.020


  7 in total

1.  Usability, Feasibility, and Effect of a Biocueing Intervention in Addition to a Moderated Digital Social Therapy-Platform in Young People With Emerging Mental Health Problems: A Mixed-Method Approach.

Authors:  Marilon van Doorn; Laurens A Nijhuis; Anne Monsanto; Thérèse van Amelsvoort; Arne Popma; Monique W M Jaspers; Matthijs L Noordzij; Ferko G Öry; Mario Alvarez-Jimenez; Dorien H Nieman
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 5.435

2.  CATALISE: A Multinational and Multidisciplinary Delphi Consensus Study. Identifying Language Impairments in Children.

Authors:  D V M Bishop; Margaret J Snowling; Paul A Thompson; Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  How Living in Vulnerable Conditions Undermines Cognitive Development: Evidence from the Pediatric Population of Guatemala.

Authors:  Joaquín A Ibáñez-Alfonso; Rosalba Company-Córdoba; Claudia García de la Cadena; Antonio Sianes; Ian Craig Simpson
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-29

4.  Elizabeth Usher Memorial Lecture: Language is literacy is language - Positioning speech-language pathology in education policy, practice, paradigms and polemics.

Authors:  Pamela C Snow
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.484

5.  Classroom Promotion of Oral Language (CPOL): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a school-based intervention to improve children's literacy outcomes at grade 3, oral language and mental health.

Authors:  Sharon Goldfeld; Pamela Snow; Patricia Eadie; John Munro; Lisa Gold; Ha N D Le; Francesca Orsini; Beth Shingles; Katherine Lee; Judy Connell; Amy Watts
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  More or less likely to offend? Young adults with a history of identified developmental language disorders.

Authors:  Maxine Winstanley; Roger T Webb; Gina Conti-Ramsden
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Psycholinguistic and socioemotional characteristics of young offenders: Do language abilities and gender matter?

Authors:  Maxine Winstanley; Roger T Webb; Gina Conti-Ramsden
Journal:  Legal Criminol Psychol       Date:  2019-04-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.