Maria D Van Kerkhove1, Neil M Ferguson. 1. Imperial College London, MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, W2 1PG London, England. m.vankerkhove@imperial.ac.uk
Abstract
PROBLEM: Outbreak analysis and mathematical modelling are crucial for planning public health responses to infectious disease outbreaks, epidemics and pandemics. This paper describes the data analysis and mathematical modelling undertaken during and following the 2009 influenza pandemic, especially to inform public health planning and decision-making. APPROACH: Soon after A(H1N1)pdm09 emerged in North America in 2009, the World Health Organization convened an informal mathematical modelling network of public health and academic experts and modelling groups. This network and other modelling groups worked with policy-makers to characterize the dynamics and impact of the pandemic and assess the effectiveness of interventions in different settings. SETTING: The 2009 A(H1N1) influenza pandemic. RELEVANT CHANGES: Modellers provided a quantitative framework for analysing surveillance data and for understanding the dynamics of the epidemic and the impact of interventions. However, what most often informed policy decisions on a day-to-day basis was arguably not sophisticated simulation modelling, but rather, real-time statistical analyses based on mechanistic transmission models relying on available epidemiologic and virologic data. LESSONS LEARNT: A key lesson was that modelling cannot substitute for data; it can only make use of available data and highlight what additional data might best inform policy. Data gaps in 2009, especially from low-resource countries, made it difficult to evaluate severity, the effects of seasonal variation on transmission and the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions. Better communication between modellers and public health practitioners is needed to manage expectations, facilitate data sharing and interpretation and reduce inconsistency in results.
PROBLEM: Outbreak analysis and mathematical modelling are crucial for planning public health responses to infectious disease outbreaks, epidemics and pandemics. This paper describes the data analysis and mathematical modelling undertaken during and following the 2009 influenza pandemic, especially to inform public health planning and decision-making. APPROACH: Soon after A(H1N1)pdm09 emerged in North America in 2009, the World Health Organization convened an informal mathematical modelling network of public health and academic experts and modelling groups. This network and other modelling groups worked with policy-makers to characterize the dynamics and impact of the pandemic and assess the effectiveness of interventions in different settings. SETTING: The 2009 A(H1N1) influenza pandemic. RELEVANT CHANGES: Modellers provided a quantitative framework for analysing surveillance data and for understanding the dynamics of the epidemic and the impact of interventions. However, what most often informed policy decisions on a day-to-day basis was arguably not sophisticated simulation modelling, but rather, real-time statistical analyses based on mechanistic transmission models relying on available epidemiologic and virologic data. LESSONS LEARNT: A key lesson was that modelling cannot substitute for data; it can only make use of available data and highlight what additional data might best inform policy. Data gaps in 2009, especially from low-resource countries, made it difficult to evaluate severity, the effects of seasonal variation on transmission and the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions. Better communication between modellers and public health practitioners is needed to manage expectations, facilitate data sharing and interpretation and reduce inconsistency in results.
Authors: Neil M Ferguson; Derek A T Cummings; Simon Cauchemez; Christophe Fraser; Steven Riley; Aronrag Meeyai; Sopon Iamsirithaworn; Donald S Burke Journal: Nature Date: 2005-08-03 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jiang Wu; Xiang Zhong; Chris Ka-fai Li; Jian-fang Zhou; Min Lu; Kuan-Ying Huang; Mei Dong; Yan Liu; Feng-Ji Luo; Ning Du; Cecilia Chui; Li-Qi Liu; Nicola M G Smith; Bo Li; Nian-Min Shi; Li-Fei Song; Yan Gao; Da-Yan Wang; Xu Wang; Wen-Fei Zhu; Yan Yan; Zi Li; Jiang-Ting Chen; Andrew J McMichael; Wei-Dong Yin; Xiao-Ning Xu; Yuelong Shu Journal: Vaccine Date: 2010-12-02 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Lulla Opatowski; Christophe Fraser; Jamie Griffin; Eric de Silva; Maria D Van Kerkhove; Emily J Lyons; Simon Cauchemez; Neil M Ferguson Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Simon Cauchemez; Neil M Ferguson; Claude Wachtel; Anders Tegnell; Guillaume Saour; Ben Duncan; Angus Nicoll Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Neil M Ferguson; Matt J Keeling; W John Edmunds; Raymond Gani; Bryan T Grenfell; Roy M Anderson; Steve Leach Journal: Nature Date: 2003-10-16 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Eric T Lofgren; M Elizabeth Halloran; Caitlin M Rivers; John M Drake; Travis C Porco; Bryan Lewis; Wan Yang; Alessandro Vespignani; Jeffrey Shaman; Joseph N S Eisenberg; Marisa C Eisenberg; Madhav Marathe; Samuel V Scarpino; Kathleen A Alexander; Rafael Meza; Matthew J Ferrari; James M Hyman; Lauren A Meyers; Stephen Eubank Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Keith R Bisset; Jiangzhuo Chen; Suruchi Deodhar; Xizhou Feng; Yifei Ma; Madhav V Marathe Journal: ACM Trans Model Comput Simul Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 1.075
Authors: Simon Cauchemez; Peter Horby; Annette Fox; Le Quynh Mai; Le Thi Thanh; Pham Quang Thai; Le Nguyen Minh Hoa; Nguyen Tran Hien; Neil M Ferguson Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Hans Heesterbeek; Roy M Anderson; Viggo Andreasen; Shweta Bansal; Daniela De Angelis; Chris Dye; Ken T D Eames; W John Edmunds; Simon D W Frost; Sebastian Funk; T Deirdre Hollingsworth; Thomas House; Valerie Isham; Petra Klepac; Justin Lessler; James O Lloyd-Smith; C Jessica E Metcalf; Denis Mollison; Lorenzo Pellis; Juliet R C Pulliam; Mick G Roberts; Cecile Viboud Journal: Science Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Kim M Pepin; Jia Wang; Colleen T Webb; Jennifer A Hoeting; Mary Poss; Peter J Hudson; Wenshan Hong; Huachen Zhu; Yi Guan; Steven Riley Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 3.240