Literature DB >> 22511700

Relationship between the concentration of hydrocodone and its conversion to hydromorphone in chronic pain patients using urinary excretion data.

Neveen H Barakat1, Rabia S Atayee, Brookie M Best, Amadeo J Pesce.   

Abstract

Hydrocodone in combination with acetaminophen is commonly used to control moderate pain and is metabolized by cytochrome P4502D6 to form the active metabolite, hydromorphone. The purpose of this study was to determine the metabolic relationship and variability between hydrocodone and its conversion to hydromorphone using urinary excretion data from chronic pain patients. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to quantitate hydrocodone and hydromorphone concentrations in urine specimens. The first visits of 25,200 subjects who took hydrocodone and not hydromorphone and had measurable concentrations were included in this study. The geometric mean (95% confidence index) of hydrocodone and hydromorphone urine concentrations were 1.39 (1.37-1.41) mg per gram of creatinine and 0.224 (0.221-0.227) mg per gram of creatinine, respectively. The log of creatinine-corrected hydromorphone versus the log of creatinine-corrected hydrocodone showed a positive relationship (R(2) = 0.20), with 60-fold variability between subjects. The plot of the log of the metabolic ratio ([hydromorphone] divided by [hydrocodone]) versus the log of creatinine-corrected hydrocodone had a coefficient of determination of R(2) = 0.42, with 125-fold variability between subjects. Ultra-rapid metabolizers represented 0.6% of the population, whereas 4% were poor metabolizers. Within-subject variability for the excretion of hydrocodone in urine was 23-fold, whereas between-subject variability was 134-fold. Hydrocodone and hydromorphone urine concentrations showed great variability within and between subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22511700     DOI: 10.1093/jat/bks019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anal Toxicol        ISSN: 0146-4760            Impact factor:   3.367


  6 in total

Review 1.  Review of the Current State of Urine Drug Testing in Chronic Pain: Still Effective as a Clinical Tool and Curbing Abuse, or an Arcane Test?

Authors:  Krishnan Chakravarthy; Aneesh Goel; George M Jeha; Alan David Kaye; Paul J Christo
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2021-02-17

Review 2.  Laboratory testing for prescription opioids.

Authors:  Michael C Milone
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2012-12

Review 3.  Pharmacogenomics of Pain Management: The Impact of Specific Biological Polymorphisms on Drugs and Metabolism.

Authors:  Elyse M Cornett; Michelle A Carroll Turpin; Allison Pinner; Pankaj Thakur; Tamizh Selvan Gnana Sekaran; Harish Siddaiah; Jasmine Rivas; Anna Yates; G Jason Huang; Anitha Senthil; Narjeet Khurmi; Jenna L Miller; Cain W Stark; Richard D Urman; Alan David Kaye
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Genetic Testing for Opioid Pain Management: A Primer.

Authors:  Deepti Agarwal; Mercy A Udoji; Andrea Trescot
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2017-04-13

Review 5.  Cancer Pain Management: Opioid Analgesics, Part 2.

Authors:  Rita J Wickham
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2017-09-01

6.  Nephrotoxicity in a Patient With Inadequate Pain Control: Potential Role of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Cytochrome P450 2D6 and Apolipoprotein L1.

Authors:  Emma M Tillman; Todd C Skaar; Michael T Eadon
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 5.810

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.