Literature DB >> 22511614

Direct use of the comet assay to study cell cycle distribution and its application to study cell cycle-dependent DNA damage formation.

Marcin Kruszewski1, Teresa Iwaneńko, Eugeniusz K Machaj, Tomasz Ołdak, Maria Wojewódzka, Lucyna Kapka-Skrzypczak, Zygmunt Pojda.   

Abstract

The comet assay or single cell gel electrophoresis has proven to be a versatile and sensitive method of measuring the induction and repair of DNA damage in individual cells. However, one of the drawbacks of the assay is the bias caused by changes in the ability of cells to repair DNA damage in different cell cycle phases. Whereas the bias seems less important when G0 peripheral blood lymphocytes are studied, it might cause problems when proliferating cells are investigated. In this paper, we validate the assumption that the total comet fluorescence intensity corresponds to the position of the cell in the cell cycle and can be used to assign single cells to specific cell cycle phases. To validate the approach, we used a very homogenous blood mononuclear CD34(+) cell population in G0 phase (unstimulated) or stimulated to enter the cell cycle. An analysis of the cell cycle distribution revealed that the 15 comet intensity classes and the 100 comets usually analyzed in a typical comet experiment are sufficient to obtain a reliable cell cycle distribution comparable with the results obtained by the flow cytometry for the same cell population. The effect of the cell cycle position on the results obtained by the comet assay for proliferating and non-proliferating cell populations irradiated with 3 Gy of X-radiation is also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22511614     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/ges018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  4 in total

1.  Sensitivity of spiral ganglion neurons to damage caused by mobile phone electromagnetic radiation will increase in lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in vitro model.

Authors:  Wen-Qi Zuo; Yu-Juan Hu; Yang Yang; Xue-Yan Zhao; Yuan-Yuan Zhang; Wen Kong; Wei-Jia Kong
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 8.322

2.  Reference cells and ploidy in the comet assay.

Authors:  Gunnar Brunborg; Andrew Collins; Anne Graupner; Kristine B Gutzkow; Ann-Karin Olsen
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  DeepFoci: Deep learning-based algorithm for fast automatic analysis of DNA double-strand break ionizing radiation-induced foci.

Authors:  Tomas Vicar; Jaromir Gumulec; Radim Kolar; Olga Kopecna; Eva Pagacova; Iva Falkova; Martin Falk
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 7.271

4.  Effects of Berberine on Cell Cycle, DNA, Reactive Oxygen Species, and Apoptosis in L929 Murine Fibroblast Cells.

Authors:  Manman Gu; Jing Xu; Chunyang Han; Youxi Kang; Tengfei Liu; Yanfei He; Yanfei Huang; Cuiyan Liu
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 2.629

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.