Literature DB >> 22511232

Skeletal muscle and bone marrow derived stromal cells: a comparison of tenocyte differentiation capabilities.

Adam A Sassoon1, Yasuhiro Ozasa, Takako Chikenji, Yu-Long Sun, Dirk R Larson, Mary L Maas, Chunfeng Zhao, Jin Jen, Peter C Amadio.   

Abstract

This study investigated the comparative ability of bone marrow and skeletal muscle derived stromal cells (BMSCs and SMSCs) to express a tenocyte phenotype, and whether this expression could be augmented by growth and differentiation factor-5 (GDF-5). Tissue harvest was performed on the hind limbs of seven dogs. Stromal cells were isolated via serial expansion in culture. After four passages, tenogenesis was induced using either ascorbic acid alone or in conjunction with GDF-5. CD44, tenomodulin, collagen I, and collagen III expression levels were compared for each culture condition at 7 and 14 days following induction. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to evaluate cell morphology and production of tenomodulin and collagen I. SMSCs and BMSCs were successfully isolated in culture. Following tenocytic induction, SMSCs demonstrated an increased mean relative expression of tenomodulin, collagen I, and collagen III at 14 days. BMSCs only showed increased mean relative expression of collagen I, and collagen III at 14 days. IHC revealed positive staining for tenomodulin and collagen I at 14 days for both cell types. The morphology of skeletal muscle derived stromal cells at 14 days had an organized appearance in contrast to the haphazard arrangement of the bone marrow derived cells. GDF-5 did not affect gene expression, cell staining, or cell morphology significantly. Stromal cells from either bone marrow or skeletal muscle can be induced to increase expression of matrix genes; however, based on expression of tenomodulin and cell culture morphology SMSCs may be a more ideal candidate for tenocytic differentiation.
Copyright © 2012 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22511232      PMCID: PMC3402710          DOI: 10.1002/jor.22135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  21 in total

Review 1.  Muscle-derived stem cells: characterization and potential for cell-mediated therapy.

Authors:  B M Deasy; R J Jankowski; J Huard
Journal:  Blood Cells Mol Dis       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Muscle-derived stem cells.

Authors:  R J Jankowski; B M Deasy; J Huard
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.250

3.  Ectopic induction of tendon and ligament in rats by growth and differentiation factors 5, 6, and 7, members of the TGF-beta gene family.

Authors:  N M Wolfman; G Hattersley; K Cox; A J Celeste; R Nelson; N Yamaji; J L Dube; E DiBlasio-Smith; J Nove; J J Song; J M Wozney; V Rosen
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1997-07-15       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Characterization of cells with osteogenic potential from human marrow.

Authors:  S E Haynesworth; J Goshima; V M Goldberg; A I Caplan
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells treated with growth differentiation factor-5 express tendon-specific markers.

Authors:  Andrew Park; Macalus V Hogan; Girish S Kesturu; Roshan James; Gary Balian; Abhinav Bobby Chhabra
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  Osteoprogenitor cells within skeletal muscle.

Authors:  P Bosch; D S Musgrave; J Y Lee; J Cummins; T Shuler; T C Ghivizzani; T Evans; T D Robbins
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Counter-antigen presentation: fibroblasts produce cytokines by signalling through HLA class II molecules without inducing T-cell proliferation.

Authors:  Hideki Ohyama; Fusanori Nishimura; Michio Meguro; Shogo Takashiba; Yoji Murayama; Sho Matsushita
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2002-02-21       Impact factor: 3.861

8.  Multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from adult human synovial membrane.

Authors:  C De Bari; F Dell'Accio; P Tylzanowski; F P Luyten
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-08

9.  Cultivation of human tenocytes in high-density culture.

Authors:  G Schulze-Tanzil; A Mobasheri; P D Clegg; J Sendzik; T John; M Shakibaei
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 4.304

10.  Use of mesenchymal stem cells in a collagen matrix for Achilles tendon repair.

Authors:  R G Young; D L Butler; W Weber; A I Caplan; S L Gordon; D J Fink
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  11 in total

1.  Orthopedic cellular therapy: An overview with focus on clinical trials.

Authors:  Moon Jong Noh; Kwan Hee Lee
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-18

2.  A comparative study of the effects of growth and differentiation factor 5 on muscle-derived stem cells and bone marrow stromal cells in an in vitro tendon healing model.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Ozasa; Anne Gingery; Andrew R Thoreson; Kai-Nan An; Chunfeng Zhao; Peter C Amadio
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 3.  Tenogenic modulating insider factor: Systematic assessment on the functions of tenomodulin gene.

Authors:  Sarah Dex; Dasheng Lin; Chisa Shukunami; Denitsa Docheva
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 3.688

4.  Myostatin promotes tenogenic differentiation of C2C12 myoblast cells through Smad3.

Authors:  Kazutaka Uemura; Masanori Hayashi; Toshiro Itsubo; Ayumu Oishi; Hiroko Iwakawa; Masatoshi Komatsu; Shigeharu Uchiyama; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 2.693

5.  The Influence of Cell Source and Donor Age on the Tenogenic Potential and Chemokine Secretion of Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.

Authors:  Weronika Zarychta-Wiśniewska; Anna Burdzińska; Katarzyna Zielniok; Marta Koblowska; Kamila Gala; Piotr Pędzisz; Roksana Iwanicka-Nowicka; Anna Fogtman; Aleksandra Aksamit; Agnieszka Kulesza; Aleksandra Zołocińska; Leszek Pączek
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 5.443

6.  Biological analysis of flexor tendon repair-failure stump tissue: A potential recycling of tissue for tendon regeneration.

Authors:  C-C Lu; T Zhang; R L Reisdorf; P C Amadio; K-N An; S L Moran; A Gingery; C Zhao
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 7.  Factors Involved in Morphogenesis in the Muscle-Tendon-Bone Complex.

Authors:  Shinichi Abe; Masahito Yamamoto
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Stochastic amplitude-modulated stretching of rabbit flexor digitorum profundus tendons reduces stiffness compared to cyclic loading but does not affect tenocyte metabolism.

Authors:  Thomas H Steiner; Alexander Bürki; Stephen J Ferguson; Benjamin Gantenbein-Ritter
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  The Role of Scleraxis in Fate Determination of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Tenocyte Differentiation.

Authors:  Yonghui Li; Melissa Ramcharan; Zuping Zhou; Daniel J Leong; Takintope Akinbiyi; Robert J Majeska; Hui B Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Tendon proper- and peritenon-derived progenitor cells have unique tenogenic properties.

Authors:  Michael J Mienaltowski; Sheila M Adams; David E Birk
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 6.832

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.