Literature DB >> 22511023

Comparison of pneumatic dissection and forceps dissection in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: histological and ultrastructural findings.

Efdal Yoeruek1, Tarek Bayyoud, Johanna Hofmann, Peter Szurman, Karl-Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare air and forceps dissection of Descemet membrane (DM) in regard to endothelial cell loss, apoptosis, and ultrastructural findings for transplantation in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
METHODS: DM of 32 corneoscleral rims were separated using forceps dissection (group A) and air dissection (group B) and had been organ cultured for 1 week. The endothelial cell density (ECD) was evaluated before and immediately after DM dissection and during 1 additional week of organ culture. The presence of any residual stroma, thickness of the DM, thickness of banded and nonbanded layers, and smoothness of the lamella were analyzed. Apoptosis was evaluated by TUNEL (terminal dUTP nick-end-labeling) staining.
RESULTS: In group A, 15 of 16 usable DM were available, and in group B 14 of 16 usable DM were available. The duration of preparation was 19.7 minutes in group A and 8.8 minutes in group B. The mean ECD was 2050 ± 167 cells per square millimeter in group A and declined to 1846 ± 153 cells per square millimeter after 1 week of organ culture. The mean ECD in group B was 2038 ± 212 cells per square millimeter and declined to 1863 ± 211 cells per square millimeter. No evidence of adherent rests of corneal stroma in any specimens in either group was observed, demonstrating a stroma free separation with no differences in the smoothness of the lamellae. The rate of apoptosis positive cells was 0.37% in group A and 0.40% in group B.
CONCLUSIONS: Both separation methods seem to be equal in regard to the quality of the obtained DM. Finally, it depends on the preference of the surgeon which dissection method to use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22511023     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823f7870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  7 in total

1.  Novel liquid bubble dissection technique for DMEK lenticule preparation.

Authors:  Peter Szurman; Kai Januschowski; Annekatrin Rickmann; Lara-Jil Damm; Karl Thomas Boden; Natalia Opitz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Two-photon optical microscopy imaging of endothelial keratoplasty grafts.

Authors:  Marco Lombardo; Mohit Parekh; Sebastiano Serrao; Alessandro Ruzza; Stefano Ferrari; Giuseppe Lombardo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Eye-bank preparation of endothelial tissue.

Authors:  Grace E Boynton; Maria A Woodward
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 4.  Historical Review and Update of Surgical Treatment for Corneal Endothelial Diseases.

Authors:  José L Güell; Mostafa A El Husseiny; Felicidad Manero; Oscar Gris; Dani Elies
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2014-02-18

Review 5.  Pre-Descemet's endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Priya Narang; Amar Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Global cell-by-cell evaluation of endothelial viability after two methods of graft preparation in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Maninder Bhogal; Maria S Balda; Karl Matter; Bruce D Allan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  A novel device to visualize Descemet membrane during donor preparation for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Rajesh Fogla
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.848

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.