Literature DB >> 22510530

Independent effects of attentional gain control and competitive interactions on visual stimulus processing.

Christian Keitel1, Søren K Andersen, Cliodhna Quigley, Matthias M Müller.   

Abstract

Attention filters behaviorally relevant stimuli from the constant stream of sensory information comprising our environment. Research into underlying neural mechanisms in humans suggests that visual attention biases mutual suppression between stimuli resulting from competition for limited processing resources. As a consequence, processing of an attended stimulus is facilitated. This account makes 2 assumptions: 1) An attended stimulus is released from mutual suppression with competing stimuli and 2) an attended stimulus experiences greater gain in the presence of competing stimuli than when it is presented alone. Here, we tested these assumptions by recording frequency-tagged potentials elicited in early visual cortex that index stimulus-specific processing. We contrasted the processing of a given stimulus when its location was attended or unattended and in the presence or the absence of a nearby competing stimulus. At variance with previous findings, competition similarly suppressed processing of attended and unattended stimuli. Moreover, the magnitude of attentional gain was comparable in the presence or the absence of competing stimuli. We conclude that visuospatial selective attention does not directly modulate mutual suppression between stimuli but instead acts as a signal gain, which biases processing toward attended stimuli independent of competition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22510530     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  15 in total

1.  Stimulus competition mediates the joint effects of spatial and feature-based attention.

Authors:  Alex L White; Martin Rolfs; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Visual cortex activation to drug cues: a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging papers in addiction and substance abuse literature.

Authors:  Colleen A Hanlon; Logan T Dowdle; Thomas Naselaris; Melanie Canterberry; Bernadette M Cortese
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Stimulus-driven brain oscillations in the alpha range: entrainment of intrinsic rhythms or frequency-following response?

Authors:  Christian Keitel; Cliodhna Quigley; Philipp Ruhnau
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Feature-selective attention in healthy old age: a selective decline in selective attention?

Authors:  Cliodhna Quigley; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Attention Selectively Gates Afferent Signal Transmission to Area V4.

Authors:  Iris Grothe; David Rotermund; Simon David Neitzel; Sunita Mandon; Udo Alexander Ernst; Andreas K Kreiter; Klaus Richard Pawelzik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Norepinephrine ignites local hotspots of neuronal excitation: How arousal amplifies selectivity in perception and memory.

Authors:  Mara Mather; David Clewett; Michiko Sakaki; Carolyn W Harley
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 12.579

7.  Generic inhibition of the selected movement and constrained inhibition of nonselected movements during response preparation.

Authors:  Ludovica Labruna; Florent Lebon; Julie Duque; Pierre-Alexandre Klein; Christian Cazares; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Driving steady-state visual evoked potentials at arbitrary frequencies using temporal interpolation of stimulus presentation.

Authors:  Søren K Andersen; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 9.  Boosting visual cortex function and plasticity with acetylcholine to enhance visual perception.

Authors:  Jun Il Kang; Frédéric Huppé-Gourgues; Elvire Vaucher
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-18

10.  Flicker-Driven Responses in Visual Cortex Change during Matched-Frequency Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Philipp Ruhnau; Christian Keitel; Chrysa Lithari; Nathan Weisz; Toralf Neuling
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.