Literature DB >> 22510352

Vocal fold mucus aggregation in persons with voice disorders.

Heather Shaw Bonilha1, Lisa White, Kelsey Kuckhahn, Terri Treman Gerlach, Dimitar D Deliyski.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Mucus aggregation on the vocal folds is a common finding from laryngeal endoscopy. Patients with voice disorders report the presence of mucus aggregation. Patients also report that mucus aggregation causes them to clear their throat, a behavior believed to be harmful to vocal fold mucosa. Even though clinicians and patients report and discuss mucus aggregation, we have a limited understanding of mucus aggregation in persons with voice disorders. The primary goal of this study was to provide an initial assessment of the presence and features of mucus aggregation in persons with voice disorders. The secondary goal of this study was to determine if there are differences in mucus aggregation between persons with and without voice disorders. To address these goals, four features of mucus aggregation were judged from laryngeal endoscopy recordings from 54 speakers with voice disorders and compared to judgments of these same features in persons without voice disorders. The results from this study showed: (1) 100% of dysphonic speakers had visible mucus aggregation on their vocal folds. (2) Persons with hyperfunctional voice disorders had different mucus characteristics than persons with hypofunctional voice disorders (p=0.002). (3) Dysphonic speakers did not differ in frequency of mucus identified on the vocal folds than non-dysphonic speakers. However, the two groups had different mucus characteristics (p=0.001). Future studies are warranted to determine if these differences in mucus aggregation between persons with and without voice disorders relate to specific aspects of laryngeal pathology or patient characteristics, such as age and gender. Once we understand these relationships, we may be able to use this information to improve our diagnosis and treatment of patients with atypical laryngeal mucus aggregation. LEARNING OUTCOMES: Readers will be able to: (1) describe why mucus aggregation may be an important feature to understand in persons with voice disorders, (2) describe the features of mucus aggregation that can be visually rated, and (3) explain the similarities and differences in mucus aggregation for persons with and without voice disorders.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22510352      PMCID: PMC3367063          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Commun Disord        ISSN: 0021-9924            Impact factor:   2.288


  12 in total

1.  Experimental study of the effects of surface mucus viscosity on the glottic cycle.

Authors:  Stéphane Ayache; Maurice Ouaknine; Philippe Dejonkere; Pierre Prindere; Antoine Giovanni
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Open source software for experiment design and control.

Authors:  James M Hillenbrand; Robert T Gayvert
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Mucosal wave: a normophonic study across visualization techniques.

Authors:  Heather S Shaw; Dimitar D Deliyski
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Period and glottal width irregularities in vocally normal speakers.

Authors:  Heather Shaw Bonilha; Dimitar D Deliyski
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Age-related changes in the human laryngeal glands.

Authors:  K Sato; M Hirano
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.547

6.  Validation of an instrument to measure voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL).

Authors:  N D Hogikyan; G Sethuraman
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Videostrobolaryngoscopy of mucus layer during vocal fold vibration in patients with laryngeal tension-fatigue syndrome.

Authors:  Tzu-Yu Hsiao; Chia-Ming Liu; Kai-Nan Lin
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  Phase asymmetries in normophonic speakers: visual judgments and objective findings.

Authors:  Heather Shaw Bonilha; Dimitar D Deliyski; Terri Treman Gerlach
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 9.  Vocal fold surface hydration: a review.

Authors:  Ciara Leydon; Mahalakshmi Sivasankar; Danielle Lodewyck Falciglia; Christopher Atkins; Kimberly V Fisher
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Morphology of the subepithelial mucous glands in the adult human larynx.

Authors:  K O Nielsen
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1988
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Vocal fold epithelial barrier in health and injury: a research review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Erickson Levendoski; Ciara Leydon; Susan L Thibeault
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  The role of glottal surface adhesion on vocal folds biomechanics.

Authors:  Pinaki Bhattacharya; Thomas Siegmund
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2014-07-18

3.  Laryngeal sensation before and after clearing behaviors.

Authors:  Heather Shaw Bonilha; Terri Treman Gerlach; Lori Ellen Sutton; Amy Elizabeth Dawson; Paul J Nietert
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Efficacy of Six Tasks to Clear Laryngeal Mucus Aggregation.

Authors:  Heather Shaw Bonilha; Terri Treman Gerlach; Lori Ellen Sutton; Amy Elizabeth Dawson; Katlyn McGrattan; Paul J Nietert; Dimitar D Deliyski
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Vocal fold mucus layer: Comparison of histological protocols for visualization in mice.

Authors:  Ran An; Daniel Robbins; Federico E Rey; Susan L Thibeault
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.