Literature DB >> 22510126

Modular acute system for general surgery: hand over the operation, not the patient.

Garth H Poole1, Tamara Glyn, Sanket Srinivasa, Andrew G Hill.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Various models have been proposed to effectively provide acute surgical care in Australasia. Recently, General Surgeons Australia (GSA) has published a 12-point plan with guiding principles on this matter. This study describes a model of providing acute general surgical care in a high-volume institution, evaluates clinical outcomes and critically appraises the system against the GSA 12-point plan.
METHODS: The acute care system is qualitatively described with quantitative measures of workload. The outcomes of acute laparoscopic cholecystectomy were used as a proxy of system performance. The system was critically appraised against the GSA 12-point plan.
RESULTS: Teams are on call once per week with each surgeon on call once per fortnight. The three key elements of acute management - collecting patients, post-acute ward round and operating - are treated as modules. The patient remains under the care of the admitting consultant but is often operated on by another team. From June 2009 to 2010, there were 7429 acute general surgical admissions (mean: 20.4 patients per day) with 2999 acute operations (mean: 8.4 operations per day). The other activities of the department were not compromised. In that time, 388 acute laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed with a conversion rate of 1.3% and no major bile duct injury. The system is compatible with the GSA 12-point plan.
CONCLUSION: This study describes an efficient and safe system for providing acute general surgical care in a high-volume setting with satisfactory clinical outcomes. It is compatible with the GSA 12-point plan.
© 2012 The Authors. ANZ Journal of Surgery © 2012 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22510126     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2011.05963.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  4 in total

1.  Introduction of an acute surgical unit: comparison of performance indicators and outcomes for operative management of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  John F Lancashire; M Steele; D Parker; H Puhalla
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  The acute surgical unit model verses the traditional "on call" model: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vinayak Nagaraja; Guy D Eslick; Michael R Cox
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Emergency General Surgery: evolution of a subspecialty by stealth.

Authors:  L Pearce; S R Smith; E Parkin; C Hall; J Kennedy; A Macdonald
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Acute Care Surgery Models Worldwide: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mats J L van der Wee; Gwendolyn van der Wilden; Rigo Hoencamp
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.352

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.