PURPOSE:Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) have been shown to overcome resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) linked to epigenetic changes and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) state. This randomized phase II study evaluated the outcome of erlotinib with and without the isoform selective HDACi, entinostat. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously treated patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer, no prior EGFR-TKIs, and performance status ≤ 2 were randomly administered erlotinib 150 mg on days 1 through 28 plus entinostat 10 mg orally on days 1 and 15 every 28 days (EE) or erlotinib plus placebo (EP). The primary end point was 4-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate with additional end points including 6-month PFS rate, PFS, and overall survival (OS). Exploratory analyses included EMT- and EGFR-related biomarker analysis on archival tissue. RESULTS:One hundred thirty-two patients were enrolled (EE, 67; EP, 65). The 4-month PFS rate was comparable for both groups (EE, 18% v EP, 20%; P = .7). In the subset of patients with high E-cadherin levels, OS was longer in the EE group compared with the EP group (9.4 v 5.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.92; P = .03) with a corresponding trend toward increased PFS. The adverse event (AE) profile was acceptable, with rash, fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea the most common AEs in both groups. CONCLUSION:Erlotinib combined with entinostat did not improve the outcomes of patients in the overall study population when compared with erlotinib monotherapy. High E-cadherin expression levels at time of diagnosis indicate an increased sensitivity to HDACi/EGFR-TKI inhibition providing the basis for a biomarker-driven validation study.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) have been shown to overcome resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) linked to epigenetic changes and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) state. This randomized phase II study evaluated the outcome of erlotinib with and without the isoform selective HDACi, entinostat. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously treated patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer, no prior EGFR-TKIs, and performance status ≤ 2 were randomly administered erlotinib 150 mg on days 1 through 28 plus entinostat 10 mg orally on days 1 and 15 every 28 days (EE) or erlotinib plus placebo (EP). The primary end point was 4-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate with additional end points including 6-month PFS rate, PFS, and overall survival (OS). Exploratory analyses included EMT- and EGFR-related biomarker analysis on archival tissue. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two patients were enrolled (EE, 67; EP, 65). The 4-month PFS rate was comparable for both groups (EE, 18% v EP, 20%; P = .7). In the subset of patients with high E-cadherin levels, OS was longer in the EE group compared with the EP group (9.4 v 5.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.92; P = .03) with a corresponding trend toward increased PFS. The adverse event (AE) profile was acceptable, with rash, fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea the most common AEs in both groups. CONCLUSION:Erlotinib combined with entinostat did not improve the outcomes of patients in the overall study population when compared with erlotinib monotherapy. High E-cadherin expression levels at time of diagnosis indicate an increased sensitivity to HDACi/EGFR-TKI inhibition providing the basis for a biomarker-driven validation study.
Authors: Eunice L Kwak; Yung-Jue Bang; D Ross Camidge; Alice T Shaw; Benjamin Solomon; Robert G Maki; Sai-Hong I Ou; Bruce J Dezube; Pasi A Jänne; Daniel B Costa; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Woo-Ho Kim; Thomas J Lynch; Panos Fidias; Hannah Stubbs; Jeffrey A Engelman; Lecia V Sequist; WeiWei Tan; Leena Gandhi; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Greg C Wei; S Martin Shreeve; Mark J Ratain; Jeffrey Settleman; James G Christensen; Daniel A Haber; Keith Wilner; Ravi Salgia; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Jeffrey W Clark; A John Iafrate Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robert L Yauch; Thomas Januario; David A Eberhard; Guy Cavet; Wenjing Zhu; Ling Fu; Thinh Q Pham; Robert Soriano; Jeremy Stinson; Somasekar Seshagiri; Zora Modrusan; Chin-Yu Lin; Vincent O'Neill; Lukas C Amler Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-12-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Christopher D Coldren; Barbara A Helfrich; Samir E Witta; Michio Sugita; Razvan Lapadat; Chan Zeng; Anna Barón; Wilbur A Franklin; Fred R Hirsch; Mark W Geraci; Paul A Bunn Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Frances A Shepherd; José Rodrigues Pereira; Tudor Ciuleanu; Eng Huat Tan; Vera Hirsh; Sumitra Thongprasert; Daniel Campos; Savitree Maoleekoonpiroj; Michael Smylie; Renato Martins; Maximiliano van Kooten; Mircea Dediu; Brian Findlay; Dongsheng Tu; Dianne Johnston; Andrea Bezjak; Gary Clark; Pedro Santabárbara; Lesley Seymour Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-07-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Samir E Witta; Robert M Gemmill; Fred R Hirsch; Christopher D Coldren; Karla Hedman; Larisa Ravdel; Barbara Helfrich; Rafal Dziadziuszko; Daniel C Chan; Michio Sugita; Zeng Chan; Anna Baron; Wilbur Franklin; Harry A Drabkin; Luc Girard; Adi F Gazdar; John D Minna; Paul A Bunn Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-01-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Osamu Tetsu; Matthew J Hangauer; Janyaporn Phuchareon; David W Eisele; Frank McCormick Journal: Chemotherapy Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 2.544
Authors: Janitza L Montalvo-Ortiz; Jack Keegan; Christopher Gallardo; Nicolas Gerst; Kazuhiro Tetsuka; Chris Tucker; Mitsuyuki Matsumoto; Deyu Fang; John G Csernansky; Hongxin Dong Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2013-12-24 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Jhanelle E Gray; Eric Haura; Alberto Chiappori; Tawee Tanvetyanon; Charles C Williams; Mary Pinder-Schenck; Julie A Kish; Jenny Kreahling; Richard Lush; Anthony Neuger; Leticia Tetteh; Angela Akar; Xiuhua Zhao; Michael J Schell; Gerold Bepler; Soner Altiok Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531