Literature DB >> 22508136

Municipal wastewater treatment by biofiltration: comparisons of various treatment layouts. Part 1: assessment of carbon and nitrogen removal.

Vincent Rocher1, Catherine Paffoni, Alexandre Gonçalves, Sabrina Guérin, Sam Azimi, Johnny Gasperi, Régis Moilleron, André Pauss.   

Abstract

One of the largest wastewater treatment plants in the Paris conurbation (240,000 m(3)/d) has been studied over several years in order to provide technical and economical information about biological treatment by biofiltration. Biofiltration systems are processes in which carbon and nitrogen pollution of wastewater are treated by ascendant flow through immersed fixed cultures. This paper, focused on technical information, aims: (1) to compare performances of the three biological treatment layouts currently used in biofiltration systems: upstream denitrification (UD), downstream denitrification (DD) and combined upstream-downstream denitrification (U-DD) layouts; and (2) to describe in detail each treatment step. Our study has shown that more than 90% of the carbon and ammoniacal pollution is removed during biological treatment, whatever the layout used. Nitrate, produced during nitrification, is then reduced to atmospheric nitrogen. This reduction is more extensive when the denitrification stage occurs downstream from the treatment (DD layout with methanol addition), whereas it is only partial when it is inserted upstream from the treatment (UD layout - use of endogenous carbonaceous substrate). So, the UD layout leads to a nitrate concentration that exceeds the regulatory threshold in the effluent, and the treatment must be supplemented with a post-denitrification step (U-DD layout). Our work has also shown that the optimal ammonium-loading rate is about 1.1-1.2 kg N-NH(4)(+) per m(3) media (polystyrene) and day. For denitrification, the optimal nitrate-loading rate is about 2.5 kg N per m(3) media (expanded clay) and day in the case of DD with methanol, and is about 0.25 kg N-NO(3)(-) per m(3) media and day in the case of UD with exogenous carbonaceous substrate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22508136     DOI: 10.2166/wst.2012.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Sci Technol        ISSN: 0273-1223            Impact factor:   1.915


  3 in total

1.  Nitrite accumulation during denitrification depends on the carbon quality and quantity in wastewater treatment with biofilters.

Authors:  Vincent Rocher; Anniet M Laverman; Johnny Gasperi; Sam Azimi; Sabrina Guérin; Stéphane Mottelet; Thierry Villières; André Pauss
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Biofiltration vs conventional activated sludge plants: what about priority and emerging pollutants removal?

Authors:  R Mailler; J Gasperi; V Rocher; S Gilbert-Pawlik; D Geara-Matta; R Moilleron; G Chebbo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Variation of raw wastewater microbiological quality in dry and wet weather conditions.

Authors:  Françoise S Lucas; Claire Therial; Alexandre Gonçalves; Pierre Servais; Vincent Rocher; Jean-Marie Mouchel
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 4.223

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.