OBJECTIVE: Acinic (or acinar) cell carcinoma (ACC) represents approximately 10% of salivary gland malignant tumors and most commonly occurs in the parotid gland. It carries a propensity for locoregional and distant metastasis. Although it is selectively used as an adjuvant in this tumor, radiotherapy (RT) has not been sufficiently examined in large population studies for survival impact. DESIGN: Retrospective database review. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: A total of 1241 cases of parotid ACC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program database from 1988 to 2007 were identified and analyzed. INTERVENTIONS: Comparison groups were surgery and surgery plus RT. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for oncologic stage and histologic grade. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 969 patients had sufficient staging data for inclusion. When comparing surgery with surgery with adjuvant RT, there was no statistical difference in overall survival when stratifying for stage I (P = .57), stage II (P = .37), stage III (P = .25), and stage IV (P = .24) tumors. Similarly, adjuvant RT did not demonstrate a survival advantage when stratified by histologic grade of tumor. The highest-grade and highest-stage tumors were fewer in number, however. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study represents the largest cohort of patients treated for ACC of the parotid. Adjuvant RT does not seem to provide a significant survival advantage for early-stage or lower-grade parotid ACC. Radiotherapy for highest-stage and highest-grade tumors requires further study.
OBJECTIVE: Acinic (or acinar) cell carcinoma (ACC) represents approximately 10% of salivary gland malignant tumors and most commonly occurs in the parotid gland. It carries a propensity for locoregional and distant metastasis. Although it is selectively used as an adjuvant in this tumor, radiotherapy (RT) has not been sufficiently examined in large population studies for survival impact. DESIGN: Retrospective database review. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: A total of 1241 cases of parotid ACC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program database from 1988 to 2007 were identified and analyzed. INTERVENTIONS: Comparison groups were surgery and surgery plus RT. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for oncologic stage and histologic grade. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 969 patients had sufficient staging data for inclusion. When comparing surgery with surgery with adjuvant RT, there was no statistical difference in overall survival when stratifying for stage I (P = .57), stage II (P = .37), stage III (P = .25), and stage IV (P = .24) tumors. Similarly, adjuvant RT did not demonstrate a survival advantage when stratified by histologic grade of tumor. The highest-grade and highest-stage tumors were fewer in number, however. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study represents the largest cohort of patients treated for ACC of the parotid. Adjuvant RT does not seem to provide a significant survival advantage for early-stage or lower-grade parotid ACC. Radiotherapy for highest-stage and highest-grade tumors requires further study.
Authors: V Vander Poorten; A Triantafyllou; L D R Thompson; J Bishop; E Hauben; J Hunt; A Skalova; G Stenman; R P Takes; D R Gnepp; H Hellquist; B Wenig; D Bell; A Rinaldo; A Ferlito Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2015-12-19 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Joseph Zenga; Anuurag S Parikh; Kevin S Emerick; Derrick T Lin; William C Faquin; Daniel G Deschler Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Maximilian P Schmid; Thomas Held; Kristin Lang; Klaus Herfarth; Juliane Hörner-Rieber; Semi B Harrabi; Julius Moratin; Christian Freudlsperger; Karim Zaoui; Jürgen Debus; Sebastian Adeberg Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-01-02 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Michał Żurek; Kamil Jasak; Karolina Jaros; Piotr Daniel; Kazimierz Niemczyk; Anna Rzepakowska Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-18 Impact factor: 4.614